Showing 915 of 915 total issues

Method Conveyor.doImage has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (c *Conveyor) doImage(ctx context.Context, img *image.Image, phases []Phase) error {
    return logboek.Context(ctx).LogProcess(img.LogDetailedName()).
        Options(func(options types.LogProcessOptionsInterface) {
            options.Style(img.LogProcessStyle())
        }).
Severity: Minor
Found in pkg/build/conveyor.go - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method Dependency.validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (d *Dependency) validate() error {
    if d.ImageName == "" {
        return newDetailedConfigError("image name is not specified for dependency", d.raw, d.raw.doc())
    }

Severity: Minor
Found in pkg/config/dependency.go - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _deprecated_msg has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _deprecated_msg(self, msg, version=None, removed=False):
        ''' used to print out a deprecation message.'''
        if not removed and not C.DEPRECATION_WARNINGS:
            return

Severity: Minor
Found in pkg/build/builder/ansible/callback/live.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function mock_subprocess_Popen_in_low_level_execute has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def mock_subprocess_Popen_in_low_level_execute():
    from ansible.plugins.action import ActionBase
    import subprocess
    original_low_exec = ActionBase._low_level_execute_command
    def new_low_exec(self, cmd, **kwargs):
Severity: Minor
Found in pkg/build/builder/ansible/sitecustomize.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded --without-p11-kit --with-included-libtasn1 --with-included-unistring", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "cd build_unix && ../dist/configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "cd build_unix && make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

build do
  env = with_standard_compiler_flags(with_embedded_path)

  command "./configure --prefix=#{install_dir}/embedded", env: env
  command "make -j #{workers}", env: env
Severity: Major
Found in stapel/omnibus/config/software/shadow.rb and 10 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
stapel/omnibus/config/software/berkley-db.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/diffutils.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/e2fsprogs.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/file.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/gnutls.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/libnettle.rb on lines 15..21
stapel/omnibus/config/software/rsync.rb on lines 17..23
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sed.rb on lines 16..22
stapel/omnibus/config/software/sqlite3.rb on lines 13..19
stapel/omnibus/config/software/termcap.rb on lines 13..19

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language