File Html.php
has 598 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Collection of methods to generate HTML content
*
* Copyright © 2009 Aryeh Gregor
Function expandAttributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function expandAttributes( array $attribs ) {
$ret = '';
foreach ( $attribs as $key => $value ) {
// Support intuitive [ 'checked' => true/false ] form
if ( $value === false || $value === null ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dropDefaults
has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static function dropDefaults( $element, array $attribs ) {
// Whenever altering this array, please provide a covering test case
// in HtmlTest::provideElementsWithAttributesHavingDefaultValues
static $attribDefaults = [
'area' => [ 'shape' => 'rect' ],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Html
has 35 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Html {
/** @var bool[] List of void elements from HTML5, section 8.1.2 as of 2016-09-19 */
private static $voidElements = [
'area' => true,
'base' => true,
Method dropDefaults
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static function dropDefaults( $element, array $attribs ) {
// Whenever altering this array, please provide a covering test case
// in HtmlTest::provideElementsWithAttributesHavingDefaultValues
static $attribDefaults = [
'area' => [ 'shape' => 'rect' ],
Function listDropdownOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function listDropdownOptions( $list, $params = [] ) {
$options = [];
if ( isset( $params['other'] ) ) {
$options[ $params['other'] ] = 'other';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expandAttributes
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function expandAttributes( array $attribs ) {
$ret = '';
foreach ( $attribs as $key => $value ) {
// Support intuitive [ 'checked' => true/false ] form
if ( $value === false || $value === null ) {
Method openElement
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function openElement( $element, $attribs = [] ) {
$attribs = (array)$attribs;
// This is not required in HTML5, but let's do it anyway, for
// consistency and better compression.
$element = strtolower( $element );
Method namespaceSelector
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function namespaceSelector(
array $params = [],
array $selectAttribs = []
) {
ksort( $selectAttribs );
Function namespaceSelectorOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function namespaceSelectorOptions( array $params = [] ) {
if ( !isset( $params['exclude'] ) || !is_array( $params['exclude'] ) ) {
$params['exclude'] = [];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method listDropdownOptions
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function listDropdownOptions( $list, $params = [] ) {
$options = [];
if ( isset( $params['other'] ) ) {
$options[ $params['other'] ] = 'other';
Method namespaceSelectorOptions
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function namespaceSelectorOptions( array $params = [] ) {
if ( !isset( $params['exclude'] ) || !is_array( $params['exclude'] ) ) {
$params['exclude'] = [];
}
Function namespaceSelector
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function namespaceSelector(
array $params = [],
array $selectAttribs = []
) {
ksort( $selectAttribs );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function openElement
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function openElement( $element, $attribs = [] ) {
$attribs = (array)$attribs;
// This is not required in HTML5, but let's do it anyway, for
// consistency and better compression.
$element = strtolower( $element );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function listDropdownOptionsOoui
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function listDropdownOptionsOoui( $options ) {
$optionsOoui = [];
foreach ( $options as $text => $value ) {
if ( is_array( $value ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static function listDropdownOptions( $list, $params = [] ) {
$options = [];
if ( isset( $params['other'] ) ) {
$options[ $params['other'] ] = 'other';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 332.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$validTypes = [
'hidden' => true,
'text' => true,
'password' => true,
'checkbox' => true,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static function listDropdownOptionsOoui( $options ) {
$optionsOoui = [];
foreach ( $options as $text => $value ) {
if ( is_array( $value ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static function check( $name, $checked = false, array $attribs = [] ) {
if ( isset( $attribs['value'] ) ) {
$value = $attribs['value'];
unset( $attribs['value'] );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static function radio( $name, $checked = false, array $attribs = [] ) {
if ( isset( $attribs['value'] ) ) {
$value = $attribs['value'];
unset( $attribs['value'] );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76