File ParsoidHandler.php
has 672 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Copyright (C) 2011-2020 Wikimedia Foundation and others.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
Function wt2html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function wt2html(
PageConfig $pageConfig, array $attribs, ?string $wikitext = null
) {
$request = $this->getRequest();
$opts = $attribs['opts'];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method wt2html
has 112 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function wt2html(
PageConfig $pageConfig, array $attribs, ?string $wikitext = null
) {
$request = $this->getRequest();
$opts = $attribs['opts'];
Function acceptable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function acceptable( array &$attribs ): bool {
$request = $this->getRequest();
$format = $attribs['opts']['format'];
if ( $format === ParsoidFormatHelper::FORMAT_WIKITEXT ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getRequestAttributes
has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function &getRequestAttributes(): array {
if ( $this->requestAttributes ) {
return $this->requestAttributes;
}
Function getRequestAttributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function &getRequestAttributes(): array {
if ( $this->requestAttributes ) {
return $this->requestAttributes;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ParsoidHandler
has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
abstract class ParsoidHandler extends Handler {
// TODO logging, timeouts(?), CORS
// TODO content negotiation (routes.js routes.acceptable)
// TODO handle MaxConcurrentCallsError (pool counter?)
Method pb2pb
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function pb2pb( array $attribs ) {
$opts = $attribs['opts'];
$revision = $opts['previous'] ?? $opts['original'] ?? null;
if ( !isset( $revision['html'] ) ) {
Method acceptable
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function acceptable( array &$attribs ): bool {
$request = $this->getRequest();
$format = $attribs['opts']['format'];
if ( $format === ParsoidFormatHelper::FORMAT_WIKITEXT ) {
Method languageConversion
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function languageConversion(
PageConfig $pageConfig, array $attribs, array $revision
) {
$opts = $attribs['opts'];
$target = $opts['updates']['variant']['target'] ??
Function pb2pb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function pb2pb( array $attribs ) {
$opts = $attribs['opts'];
$revision = $opts['previous'] ?? $opts['original'] ?? null;
if ( !isset( $revision['html'] ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tryToCreatePageConfig
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function tryToCreatePageConfig(
array $attribs, ?string $wikitextOverride = null, bool $html2WtMode = false
): PageConfig {
$revId = $attribs['oldid'];
$pagelanguageOverride = $attribs['pagelanguage'];
Method assertDomainIsCorrect
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function assertDomainIsCorrect( $domain ): void {
// We are cutting some corners here (IDN, non-ASCII casing)
// since domain name support is provisional.
// TODO use a proper validator instead
$server = RequestContext::getMain()->getConfig()->get( MainConfigNames::Server );
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
( $format === ParsoidFormatHelper::FORMAT_HTML && $type === 'text/html' ) ||
( $format === ParsoidFormatHelper::FORMAT_PAGEBUNDLE && $type === 'application/json' )
) {
if ( $profile ) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true;
Function tryToCreatePageConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function tryToCreatePageConfig(
array $attribs, ?string $wikitextOverride = null, bool $html2WtMode = false
): PageConfig {
$revId = $attribs['oldid'];
$pagelanguageOverride = $attribs['pagelanguage'];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function assertDomainIsCorrect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function assertDomainIsCorrect( $domain ): void {
// We are cutting some corners here (IDN, non-ASCII casing)
// since domain name support is provisional.
// TODO use a proper validator instead
$server = RequestContext::getMain()->getConfig()->get( MainConfigNames::Server );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$pb = new PageBundle(
$revision['html']['body'],
$revision['data-parsoid']['body'] ?? null,
$revision['data-mw']['body'] ?? null,
$attribs['envOptions']['inputContentVersion'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$pb = new PageBundle(
$revision['html']['body'],
$revision['data-parsoid']['body'] ?? null,
$revision['data-mw']['body'] ?? null,
$attribs['envOptions']['inputContentVersion'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76