Showing 206 of 206 total issues
Function EditorSpecPlugin
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function EditorSpecPlugin() {
return {
statePlugins: {
spec: {
wrapActions: {
Function render
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render() {
const { onClose, getComponent, converterUrl } = this.props
if(this.state.status === "new") {
return <ConvertModalStepNew
Function validateOAS3RequestBodyRefsReferenceAllowableSchemaPositions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validateOAS3RequestBodyRefsReferenceAllowableSchemaPositions = () => sys => {
return sys.validateSelectors
.allOAS3RequestBodySchemas()
.then(nodes => {
return nodes.reduce((acc, node) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validateOAS3RequestBodyRefsReferenceAllowableSchemaPositions
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validateOAS3RequestBodyRefsReferenceAllowableSchemaPositions = () => sys => {
return sys.validateSelectors
.allOAS3RequestBodySchemas()
.then(nodes => {
return nodes.reduce((acc, node) => {
Function validate2And3ParametersHaveUniqueNameAndInCombinations
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validate2And3ParametersHaveUniqueNameAndInCombinations = () => (system) => {
return system.validateSelectors
.allParameterArrays()
.then(nodes => {
return nodes.reduce((acc, node) => {
Function default
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function(system) {
// setTimeout runs on the next tick
setTimeout(() => {
if(localStorage.getItem(CONTENT_KEY)) {
system.specActions.updateSpec(localStorage.getItem(CONTENT_KEY), "local-storage")
Function validateSecurityRequirementReferenceExistingScopes
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validateSecurityRequirementReferenceExistingScopes = () => (system) => {
const { allSecurityRequirements, allSecurityDefinitions } = system.validateSelectors
return Promise.all([allSecurityRequirements(), allSecurityDefinitions()])
.then(([requirementNodes, definitionNodes]) => {
Function getCompletions
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
completer.getCompletions = function(editor, session, pos, prefix, callback) {
let startTime = Date.now()
try {
ori(editor, session, pos, prefix, (...args) => {
let msElapsed = Date.now() - startTime
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
test: /\.jsx?$/,
include: [
path.join(projectBasePath, "src"),
path.join(projectBasePath, "node_modules", "object-assign-deep"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
test: /\.jsx?$/,
include: [
path.join(projectBasePath, "src"),
path.join(projectBasePath, "node_modules", "object-assign-deep"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const pathTemplates = (node.key.match(PATH_TEMPLATES_REGEX) || [])
.map(str => str.replace("{", "").replace("}", ""))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const pathTemplates = (node.key.match(PATH_TEMPLATES_REGEX) || [])
.map(str => str.replace("{", "").replace("}", ""))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function SemanticValidatorsPlugin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function SemanticValidatorsPlugin({getSystem}) {
const debAll = debounce((system) => system.validateActions.all(), 300)
const traverseOnce = makeTraverseOnce(getSystem)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function componentDidUpdate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
componentDidUpdate(prevProps) {
if(this.props.isOpen === prevProps.isOpen) {
return
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validators
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validators = () => (system) => {
return Object.keys(system.validateActions)
.filter(name => {
// The action needs to start with the prefix "validate..."
if(name.indexOf("validate") !== 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate2And3TypeArrayRequiresItems
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validate2And3TypeArrayRequiresItems = () => (system) => {
return system.validateSelectors
.allSchemas()
.then(nodes => {
return nodes.reduce((acc, node) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onChange
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const onChange = (event, formData ) => {
let updatedField
const updateForm = formData.get("updateForm")
const isRequired = formData.get("isRequired")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate2And3SchemasDefaultsMatchAnEnum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const validate2And3SchemasDefaultsMatchAnEnum = () => (system) => {
return system.validateSelectors
.allSchemas()
.then(nodes => {
return nodes.reduce((acc, node) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getCompletions
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function getCompletions(editor, session, pos, prefix, cb, ctx, system) {
Function getCompletions
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function getCompletions(editor, session, pos, prefix, cb, ctx, system) {