Showing 22 of 22 total issues
File Cmi5.ts
has 856 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import XAPI, {
Agent,
Context,
InteractionActivityDefinition,
InteractionComponent,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionSequencing(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answerIds: string[],
correctAnswerIds: string[],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 196.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionChoice(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answerIds: string[],
correctAnswerIds?: string[],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 196.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionFillIn(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answers: string[],
correctAnswers?: string[],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 171.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionLongFillIn(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answers: string[],
correctAnswers?: string[],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 171.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Cmi5
has 37 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default class Cmi5 {
private static _instance: Cmi5 | null = null;
private launchParameters: LaunchParameters;
private launchData!: LaunchData;
private learnerPreferences!: LearnerPreferences;
Function pass
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public pass(
score?: ResultScore | number,
objectiveOrOptions?: ObjectiveActivity | PassOptions
): AxiosPromise<string[]> {
// 10.0 xAPI State Data Model - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#100-xapi-state-data-model
Function interactionPerformance
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionPerformance(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answers: Performance,
correctAnswers?: PerformanceCriteria[],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function moveOn
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async moveOn(options?: MoveOnOptions): Promise<string[]> {
let effectiveOptions = options;
// 10.0 xAPI State Data Model - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#100-xapi-state-data-model
if (this.launchData.launchMode !== "Normal")
return Promise.reject(
Function moveOn
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async moveOn(options?: MoveOnOptions): Promise<string[]> {
let effectiveOptions = options;
// 10.0 xAPI State Data Model - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#100-xapi-state-data-model
if (this.launchData.launchMode !== "Normal")
return Promise.reject(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function interactionPerformance
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionPerformance(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answers: Performance,
correctAnswers?: PerformanceCriteria[],
Function initialize
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public initialize(sessionState?: {
authToken: string;
initializedDate: Date;
}): AxiosPromise<string[] | void> {
return Promise.resolve()
Function fail
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public fail(
score?: ResultScore | number,
options?: SendStatementOptions
): AxiosPromise<string[]> {
// 10.0 xAPI State Data Model - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#100-xapi-state-data-model
Function interactionMatching
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionMatching(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answers: { [sourceId: string]: string },
correctAnswers?: { [sourceId: string]: string },
Function interaction
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interaction(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
response: string,
interactionDefinition: InteractionActivityDefinition,
Function interactionNumeric
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interactionNumeric(
testId: string,
questionId: string,
answer: number,
correctAnswer: NumericCriteria,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
result: {
// 9.5.1 Score - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#951-score
...(rScore ? { score: rScore } : {}),
// 9.5.2 Success - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#952-success
success: false,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
result: {
// 9.5.1 Score - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#951-score
...(rScore ? { score: rScore } : {}),
// 9.5.2 Success - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#952-success
success: true,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function pass
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public pass(
score?: ResultScore | number,
objectiveOrOptions?: ObjectiveActivity | PassOptions
): AxiosPromise<string[]> {
// 10.0 xAPI State Data Model - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/blob/quartz/cmi5_spec.md#100-xapi-state-data-model
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Object.keys(answers)
.map((key) => {
return `${key}[.]${answers[key]}`;
})
.join("[,]"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76