xybu/onedrived-dev

View on GitHub

Showing 166 of 166 total issues

File merge_dir.py has 467 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import itertools
import logging
import os
import shutil

Severity: Minor
Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py - About 7 hrs to fix

    Function _handle_remote_file_with_record has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _handle_remote_file_with_record(self, remote_item, item_record, item_stat, item_local_abspath, all_local_items):
            """
            :param onedrivesdk.model.item.Item remote_item:
            :param onedrived.od_repo.ItemRecord item_record:
            :param posix.stat_result | None item_stat:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File od_pref.py has 408 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    #!/usr/bin/env python3
    
    import json
    import locale
    import os
    Severity: Minor
    Found in onedrived/od_pref.py - About 5 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _handle_remote_file_with_record. (27)
      Open

          def _handle_remote_file_with_record(self, remote_item, item_record, item_stat, item_local_abspath, all_local_items):
              """
              :param onedrivesdk.model.item.Item remote_item:
              :param onedrived.od_repo.ItemRecord item_record:
              :param posix.stat_result | None item_stat:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function set_drive has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def set_drive(drive_id=None, email=None, local_root=None, ignore_file=None):
          try:
              all_drives, drive_table = print_all_drives()
              click.echo()
          except Exception as e:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in onedrived/od_pref.py - About 5 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      File od_watcher.py has 365 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      import logging
      import os
      import threading
      
      import onedrivesdk.error
      Severity: Minor
      Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function set_drive. (23)
        Open

        @click.command(name='set', short_help='Add a remote Drive to sync with local directory or modify an existing one. '
                                              'If either --drive-id or --email is missing, use interactive mode.')
        @click.option('--drive-id', '-d', type=str, required=False, default=None,
                      help='ID of the Drive.')
        @click.option('--email', '-e', type=str, required=False, default=None,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_pref.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                elif item_record is not None:
                    if self.assume_remote_unchanged:
                        logging.info('Remote item for local dir "%s" is a file that has been deleted locally. '
                                     'Delete the remote item and upload the file.', item_local_abspath)
                        if not delete_item.DeleteRemoteItemTask(
        Severity: Major
        Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
        onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py on lines 508..517

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 80.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    if self.assume_remote_unchanged:
                        logging.info('Remote item for local file "%s" is a directory that has been deleted locally. '
                                     'Delete the remote item and upload the file.', item_local_abspath)
                        if not delete_item.DeleteRemoteItemTask(
                                repo=self.repo, task_pool=self.task_pool, parent_relpath=self.rel_path,
        Severity: Major
        Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
        onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py on lines 451..461

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 80.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method handle_event. (22)
        Open

            def handle_event(self, ev, flags, move_pairs):
                """
                :param inotify_simple.Event ev:
                :param [inotify_simple.flags] flags:
                :param dict[int, [inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags]] move_pairs:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _handle_unpaired_move_to. (22)
        Open

            def _handle_unpaired_move_to(self, to_ev, to_flags, to_repo,
                                         to_parent_dir=None, to_parent_relpath=None):
        
                if to_parent_dir is None:
                    to_parent_dir = self.watch_descriptors[to_ev.wd]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function _handle_unpaired_move_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _handle_unpaired_move_to(self, to_ev, to_flags, to_repo,
                                         to_parent_dir=None, to_parent_relpath=None):
        
                if to_parent_dir is None:
                    to_parent_dir = self.watch_descriptors[to_ev.wd]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function _handle_local_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _handle_local_file(self, item_name, item_record, item_stat, item_local_abspath):
                """
                :param str item_name:
                :param onedrived.od_repo.ItemRecord | None item_record:
                :param posix.stat_result | None item_stat:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _handle_local_file. (16)
        Open

            def _handle_local_file(self, item_name, item_record, item_stat, item_local_abspath):
                """
                :param str item_name:
                :param onedrived.od_repo.ItemRecord | None item_record:
                :param posix.stat_result | None item_stat:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _handle_move_pair. (16)
        Open

            def _handle_move_pair(self, move_pair):
                """
                :param [[inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags], [inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags]] move_pair:
                """
                from_tup, to_tup = move_pair
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function _handle_move_pair has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _handle_move_pair(self, move_pair):
                """
                :param [[inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags], [inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags]] move_pair:
                """
                from_tup, to_tup = move_pair
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function handle_event has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def handle_event(self, ev, flags, move_pairs):
                """
                :param inotify_simple.Event ev:
                :param [inotify_simple.flags] flags:
                :param dict[int, [inotify_simple.Event, inotify_simple.flags]] move_pairs:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_watcher.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function delete_account. (13)
        Open

        @click.command(name='del', short_help='De-authorize and delete an existing account from onedrived.')
        @click.option('--yes', '-y', is_flag=True, default=False, required=False,
                      help='If set, do not ask for confirmation but simply delete if account exists.')
        @click.option('--index', '-i', type=int, required=False, default=None,
                      help='Specify the account to delete by row index in account list table.')
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_pref.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method handle. (12)
        Open

            def handle(self):
                if not os.path.isdir(self.local_abspath):
                    logging.error('Error: Local path "%s" is not a directory.' % self.local_abspath)
                    return
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_tasks/merge_dir.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function set_config. (11)
        Open

        @click.command(name='set', short_help=translator['od_pref.set_config.short_help'])
        @click.argument('key', type=click.Choice(sorted(config_schema.keys())))
        @click.argument('value')
        def set_config(key, value):
            try:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in onedrived/od_pref.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language