Sign upLogin

yuutetu/abst_int

View on GitHub
Star
lib/abst_int/set.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Method include? has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def include? set
    # setの変数に0を代入して計算
    set_offset = set.calc 0
    # その値がselfに含まれているか確認
    input_string = set_offset < 0 ? "b" * (- set_offset) : "a" * set_offset
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/abst_int/set.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method expand has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def expand set
    return self if self.include? set
    return nil unless self.check_lank == 1 && set.check_lank == 0
    set_offset = set.calc 0
    if self.calc(-1) == set_offset
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/abst_int/set.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method << has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def << term
    new_elements = []
    added_flag = false
    @elements.each do |element|
      if (element =~ term) && (not added_flag)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/abst_int/set.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status