Sign upLogin

zammad/zammad

View on GitHub
Star
lib/report/base.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method history has 101 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.history(data)

    history_object = History::Object.lookup(name: data[:object])

    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:selector])
Severity: Major
Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method history_count has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.history_count(params)

    history_object = History::Object.lookup(name: params[:object])

    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(params[:selector])
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      File base.rb has 279 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      class Report::Base

  # :object
  # :type created|updated
  # :attribute
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method history_count has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def self.history_count(params)

    history_object = History::Object.lookup(name: params[:object])

    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(params[:selector])
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method history has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def self.history(data)

    history_object = History::Object.lookup(name: data[:object])

    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:selector])
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method time_max has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def self.time_max(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_max = 0
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method time_min has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def self.time_min(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_min = 0
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method time_min has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def self.time_min(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_min = 0
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 55 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method time_max has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def self.time_max(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_max = 0
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 55 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method time_average has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def self.time_average(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    tickets = 0
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def self.time_max(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_max = 0
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 264..293

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 84.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def self.time_min(data)
    query, bind_params, tables = Ticket.selector2sql(data[:condition])
    ticket_list = Ticket.where('tickets.created_at >= ? AND tickets.created_at <= ?', data[:start], data[:end])
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
    time_min = 0
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 301..331

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 84.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    result = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                        .where(
                          'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_from IN (?) AND histories.id_to NOT IN (?)',
                          params[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 38..48

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 33.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    result = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                        .where(
                          'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_from NOT IN (?) AND histories.id_to IN (?)',
                          params[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 51..61

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 33.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      histories = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                             .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                             .where(
                               'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_from IN (?) AND histories.id_to NOT IN (?)',
                               data[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 152..162

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 32.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      histories = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                             .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                             .where(
                               'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_from NOT IN (?) AND histories.id_to IN (?)',
                               data[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 165..175

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 32.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    result = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                        .where(
                          'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.value_to IN (?)',
                          params[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 89..98

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 30.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    result = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                        .where(
                          'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_to IN (?)',
                          params[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 77..86

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 30.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      histories = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                             .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                             .where(
                               'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.id_to IN (?)',
                               data[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 191..200

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 29.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      histories = History.select('histories.o_id').joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                             .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                             .where(
                               'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.value_to IN (?)',
                               data[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 203..212

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 29.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    result = History.joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                        .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                        .where(
                          'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.value_from IN (?) AND histories.value_to NOT IN (?)',
                          params[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 178..188

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 29.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      histories = History.joins('INNER JOIN tickets ON tickets.id = histories.o_id')
                             .where(query, *bind_params).joins(tables)
                             .where(
                               'histories.created_at >= ? AND histories.created_at <= ? AND histories.history_object_id = ? AND histories.history_type_id = ? AND histories.history_attribute_id IN (?) AND histories.value_from IN (?) AND histories.value_to NOT IN (?)',
                               data[:start],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/report/base.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            lib/report/base.rb on lines 64..74

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 29.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status