zeisler/active_mocker

View on GitHub

Showing 235 of 235 total issues

Perceived complexity for build_from is too high. [9/7]
Open

    def self.build_from(object: nil, exception: nil, class_name: nil, type: nil)
      if object
        args = [:message, :original_error, :level, :type, :class_name].each_with_object({}) do |meth, hash|
          hash[meth] = object.public_send(meth) if object.respond_to? meth
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/error_object.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for build_from is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def self.build_from(object: nil, exception: nil, class_name: nil, type: nil)
      if object
        args = [:message, :original_error, :level, :type, :class_name].each_with_object({}) do |meth, hash|
          hash[meth] = object.public_send(meth) if object.respond_to? meth
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/error_object.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Assignment Branch Condition size for safe_methods is too high. [16.4/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

      def safe_methods
        @safe_methods ||= class_introspector.parsed_source.comments.each_with_object(BASE.dup) do |comment, hash|
          if comment.text.include?("ActiveMocker.all_methods_safe")
            hash[:all_methods_safe] = ActiveMocker.module_eval(comment.text.delete("#"))
          elsif comment.text.include?("ActiveMocker.safe_methods")

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method has too many lines. [11/10] (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#short-methods)
Open

      def scope_body(_arguments, name)
        if safe_method?(:scope, name)
          find_scope_body_from_ast(name)
        else
          <<-METHOD

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Assignment Branch Condition size for collect_errors is too high. [16.28/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

    def collect_errors(create_mock_errors)
      add_errors!

      if create_mock_errors.present? || schema.attribute_errors?
        display_errors.failed_models << model_name
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/file_writer.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Assignment Branch Condition size for object_for_inspect is too high. [16.19/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

    def object_for_inspect(value)
      if value.is_a?(String) && value.length > 50
        "#{value[0, 50]}...".inspect
      elsif value.is_a?(Date) || value.is_a?(Time)
        %("#{value.to_s(:db)}")

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method has too many lines. [11/10] (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#short-methods)
Open

      def coerce(key)
        return if key.nil?
        coerced_key = key_type.coerce(key)
        if key && self.class.enums.key?(coerced_key)
          if self.class.ignore_value

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for object_for_inspect is too high. [7/6]
Open

    def object_for_inspect(value)
      if value.is_a?(String) && value.length > 50
        "#{value[0, 50]}...".inspect
      elsif value.is_a?(Date) || value.is_a?(Time)
        %("#{value.to_s(:db)}")

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Assignment Branch Condition size for build is too high. [16.67/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

        def build(db_value_type:, table_name:, attribute:, enums:, ignore_value: false)
          klass               = Class.new(ActiveMocker::AttributeTypes::Enum)
          klass.table_name    = table_name.to_sym
          klass.attribute     = attribute.to_sym
          klass.ignore_value  = ignore_value

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Perceived complexity for object_for_inspect is too high. [8/7]
Open

    def object_for_inspect(value)
      if value.is_a?(String) && value.length > 50
        "#{value[0, 50]}...".inspect
      elsif value.is_a?(Date) || value.is_a?(Time)
        %("#{value.to_s(:db)}")

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Assignment Branch Condition size for class_method_calls is too high. [15.3/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

      def class_method_calls
        @class_method_calls ||= class_introspector
                                  .class_macros
                                  .select { |h| h.keys.first == :alias_attribute }
                                  .map do |h|

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Assignment Branch Condition size for mock_build_version is too high. [15.33/15] (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric)
Open

      def mock_build_version(version, active_record: nil)
        @active_record_build_version = Gem::Version.create(active_record)
        if __active_record_build_version__ >= Gem::Version.create("5.1")
          require "active_mocker/mock/compatibility/base/ar51"
          extend AR51
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/mock/base.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method process_attr has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def process_attr(attr)
        enums                 = enums(attr.name)
        attr.default          = Virtus::Attribute.build(attr.type).coerce(attr.default)
        attr.attribute_writer = "write_attribute(:#{attr.name}, val)"
        attr.attribute_reader = "read_attribute(:#{attr.name})"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/mock_creator/attributes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_method has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def create_method(m, type)
        plural_type = (type.to_s + "s").to_sym
        if safe_method?(type, m)
          def_type   = type == :method ? :class_defs : :defs
          def_method = class_introspector.parsed_source.public_send(def_type).detect { |meth| meth.name == m }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/mock_creator/defined_methods.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method process_attr has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def process_attr(attr)
        enums                 = enums(attr.name)
        attr.default          = Virtus::Attribute.build(attr.type).coerce(attr.default)
        attr.attribute_writer = "write_attribute(:#{attr.name}, val)"
        attr.attribute_reader = "read_attribute(:#{attr.name})"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_mocker/mock_creator/attributes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [10/5] (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#too-many-params)
    Open

        def initialize(file:,
                       file_out:,
                       schema_scrapper:,
                       template_creator: nil,
                       class_introspector: nil,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/active_mocker/mock_creator.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for methods with too many parameters. The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count.

    Method coerce has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def coerce(key)
            return if key.nil?
            coerced_key = key_type.coerce(key)
            if key && self.class.enums.key?(coerced_key)
              if self.class.ignore_value
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/active_mocker/attribute_types/enum.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method object_for_inspect has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def object_for_inspect(value)
          if value.is_a?(String) && value.length > 50
            "#{value[0, 50]}...".inspect
          elsif value.is_a?(Date) || value.is_a?(Time)
            %("#{value.to_s(:db)}")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/active_mocker/mock/object_inspect.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method constants has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def constants
            class_introspector.get_class.constants.map do |v|
              c = class_introspector.get_class.const_get(v)
              next if [Module, Class].include?(c.class)
              const = if /\A#</ =~ c.inspect
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/active_mocker/mock_creator/modules_constants.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def create(attributes = {}, &block)
            if attributes.is_a?(Array)
              attributes.collect { |attr| create(attr, &block) }
            else
              record = new(id: attributes.delete(:id) || attributes.delete("id"))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/active_mocker/mock/base.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language