Showing 21 of 21 total issues
File dropzone.js
has 920 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
;(function(){
/**
* hasOwnProperty.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.prototype.setupEventListeners = function() {
var elementListeners, event, listener, _i, _len, _ref, _results;
_ref = this.listeners;
_results = [];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 202.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.prototype.removeEventListeners = function() {
var elementListeners, event, listener, _i, _len, _ref, _results;
_ref = this.listeners;
_results = [];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 202.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function init
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.prototype.init = function() {
var eventName, noPropagation, setupHiddenFileInput, _i, _len, _ref, _ref1,
_this = this;
if (this.element.tagName === "form") {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (typeof this.options.previewsContainer === "string") {
this.previewsContainer = document.querySelector(this.options.previewsContainer);
} else if (this.options.previewsContainer.nodeType != null) {
this.previewsContainer = this.options.previewsContainer;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (typeof this.options.clickable === "string") {
this.clickableElement = document.querySelector(this.options.clickable);
} else if (this.options.clickable.nodeType != null) {
this.clickableElement = this.options.clickable;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Dropzone
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Dropzone(element, options) {
var elementOptions, extend, fallback, _ref;
this.element = element;
this.version = Dropzone.version;
Function uploadFile
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.prototype.uploadFile = function(file) {
var formData, handleError, input, inputName, inputType, key, progressObj, value, xhr, _i, _len, _ref, _ref1, _ref2,
_this = this;
xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
Function createThumbnail
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.prototype.createThumbnail = function(file) {
var fileReader,
_this = this;
fileReader = new FileReader;
Function addEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var addEvent = (function () {
if (document.addEventListener) {
return function (el, type, fn) {
if (el && el.nodeName || el === window) {
el.addEventListener(type, fn, false);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_attachments_page
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def Util.load_attachments_page(params)
images = []
attachments = []
dir_config = get_attachment_directories(params)
dirs_to_crawl = [dir_config.image_dir, dir_config.file_dir]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onload
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fileReader.onload = function() {
var img;
img = new Image;
img.onload = function() {
Function onload
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
img.onload = function() {
var canvas, ctx, srcHeight, srcRatio, srcWidth, srcX, srcY, thumbnail, trgHeight, trgRatio, trgWidth, trgX, trgY;
canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
Function discover
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dropzone.discover = function() {
var checkElements, dropzone, dropzones, _i, _len, _results;
if (!Dropzone.autoDiscover) {
return;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (el && el.nodeName || el === window) {
el.addEventListener(type, fn, false);
} else if (el && el.length) {
for (var i = 0; i < el.length; i++) {
addEvent(el[i], type, fn);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (el && el.nodeName || el === window) {
el.attachEvent('on' + type, function () { return fn.call(el, window.event); });
} else if (el && el.length) {
for (var i = 0; i < el.length; i++) {
addEvent(el[i], type, fn);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function relative
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require.relative = function(parent) {
var p = require.normalize(parent, '..');
/**
* lastIndexOf helper.
Method editable_image
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def editable_image(options = {}, page)
key = options[:key]
image_source = nil
image_source = page.content[key] unless page.content.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compose_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compose_link(block, options, page)
key = options[:key]
content_value = nil
content_value = page.content[key] unless page.content.nil?
href_attribute = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (window.File && window.FileReader && window.FileList && window.Blob && window.FormData && document.querySelector) {
if (!("classList" in document.createElement("a"))) {
capableBrowser = false;
} else {
_ref = Dropzone.blacklistedBrowsers;