Showing 4,841 of 7,782 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, key)) {
newData[key] = _deconstructPacket(data[key] as never, buffers);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (hasOwnProp(arguments[0], key)) {
arg += key + ': ' + arguments[0][key] + ', ';
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (cc == '.') { //.xxx or . // B50-3297864
break;
}
Function sync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sync(el?: HTMLElement): void {
if (el === undefined || !zk(el).isVisible(true)) {
this.hide();
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function load(pkg: string, dt?: zk.Desktop | CallableFunction, func?: CallableFunction): boolean {
if (typeof dt == 'function') {
if (func)
throw 'At most one function allowed';
else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function depends
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function depends(a: string, b: string): void {
if (a && b) {//a depends on b
if (_loaded[a])
zk.load(b);
else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (jdot < 0)
jdot = ret.length;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (jq(p).css('position') == 'absolute') {
isAbsolute = true;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (purejdot < 0)
purejdot = pure.length;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (_afterKD(w, wevt))
return;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!cwgt.ignoreFlexSize_(o)) {
let c = cwgt.$n();
if (c) { //node might not exist if rod on
//Skip absolute or fixed DOM element size
const cpos = c.style.position;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (; c; c = c.nextSibling) {
//Skip absolute or fixed DOM element size
isText = c.nodeType == 3; // Bug ZK-2275, we need to update c.nodeType
if (!isText) {
const cpos = (c as HTMLElement).style.position;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (p2 && !_loaded[p2]) { //yes, more
var a1 = a, b1 = b;
b = function () {
zk.afterLoad(a1, b1, front); //check again
};
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (key)
tmp.push(key);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while (f == fmt.charAt(i - 1) && f) {
f = fmt.charAt(++i);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var index = symbols.length, brkswch; --index >= 0;) {
var monStr = symbols[index].toLowerCase();
if ((nonLenient && mon == monStr) || (!nonLenient && mon.startsWith(monStr))) {
var monStrLen = monStr.length;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (fmt.charAt(k) == 'r') k++; // ZK-2964: for nl local uur
Function parseDate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseDate(
txt: string,
fmt: string,
strict?: boolean,
refval?: DateImpl,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (p == document.body) break;
Function mtBL
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mtBL(): void {
for (; ;) {
if (zk.loading) {
zk.afterLoad(mtBL); //later
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"