znamenica/dneslov

View on GitHub

Showing 2,171 of 2,171 total issues

Method validate_each has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

   def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
      o = plain_options
      code = record.alphabeth_code.to_s.to_sym
      res = Languageble::MATCH_TABLE[ code ]
      if res
Severity: Minor
Found in app/validators/alphabeth_validator.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function render has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

   render() {
      console.log('props', this.props)

      return (
         [<header>
Severity: Major
Found in app/components/About.jsx - About 2 hrs to fix

    Assignment Branch Condition size for dates_to_days is too high. [33.97/30]
    Open

          def dates_to_days dates_in, julian
             [dates_in].flatten.map do |date_in|
                date = date_in.is_a?(Date) && date_in || Date.parse(date_in)
                new_date = date.strftime('%2d.%m')
                gap = julian && 13.days || 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

    Method has too many lines. [18/15]
    Open

          def dates_to_days dates_in, julian
             [dates_in].flatten.map do |date_in|
                date = date_in.is_a?(Date) && date_in || Date.parse(date_in)
                new_date = date.strftime('%2d.%m')
                gap = julian && 13.days || 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

    Method included has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

       def self.included base
          base.class_eval do
             has_many :links, as: :info, dependent: :destroy
    
             scope :with_links, -> context do
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/concerns/with_links.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Function render has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

         render() {
            console.log("[render] * this.props:", this.props, "this.state:", this.state)
      
            return [
               <div>
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/components/Records.jsx - About 1 hr to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    <label
                       className='active'
                       htmlFor={this.props.name}>
                       {this.props.title}
                       <ErrorSpan
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/components/SelectField.jsx and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
        app/components/DynamicField.jsx on lines 448..453
        app/components/TextArea.jsx on lines 115..120
        app/components/TextField.jsx on lines 93..98

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 74.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    <label
                       className='active textarea'
                       htmlFor={this.props.name}>
                       {this.props.title}
                       <ErrorSpan
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/components/TextArea.jsx and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
        app/components/DynamicField.jsx on lines 448..453
        app/components/SelectField.jsx on lines 96..101
        app/components/TextField.jsx on lines 93..98

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 74.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    <label
                       className='active'
                       htmlFor={this.props.name}>
                       {this.props.title}
                       <ErrorSpan
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/components/TextField.jsx and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
        app/components/DynamicField.jsx on lines 448..453
        app/components/SelectField.jsx on lines 96..101
        app/components/TextArea.jsx on lines 115..120

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 74.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    <label
                       className='active'
                       htmlFor={this.props.name}>
                       {this.props.title}
                       <ErrorSpan
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/components/DynamicField.jsx and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
        app/components/SelectField.jsx on lines 96..101
        app/components/TextArea.jsx on lines 115..120
        app/components/TextField.jsx on lines 93..98

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 74.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                 scope :with_description, -> context do
                    as = table.table_alias || table.name
                    language_codes = [context[:locales]].flatten
        
                    selector = self.select_values.dup
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/models/concerns/with_descriptions.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
        app/models/concerns/with_titles.rb on lines 76..91

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 76.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                 scope :with_title, -> context do
                    as = table.table_alias || table.name
                    language_codes = [context[:locales]].flatten
        
                    selector = self.select_values.dup
        Severity: Major
        Found in app/models/concerns/with_titles.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
        app/models/concerns/with_descriptions.rb on lines 53..68

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 76.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Cyclomatic complexity for find is too high. [8/6]
        Open

           def find *args
              if self.respond_to?( :default_key )
                 new_args = args.flatten.reject { |a| a.blank? }
                 rel = self.where(self.default_key => new_args)
                 if rel.size < new_args.size
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/models/concerns/default_key.rb by rubocop

        This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

        An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

        Cyclomatic complexity for dates_to_days is too high. [8/6]
        Open

              def dates_to_days dates_in, julian
                 [dates_in].flatten.map do |date_in|
                    date = date_in.is_a?(Date) && date_in || Date.parse(date_in)
                    new_date = date.strftime('%2d.%m')
                    gap = julian && 13.days || 0
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

        This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

        An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

        Cyclomatic complexity for year_date_for is too high. [8/6]
        Open

           def year_date_for year
              case year_date
              when /(?<sign>[+-])(?<indent>.*)/
                 mul = sign == '-' && -1 || 1
                 WhenEaster::EasterCalendar.find_greek_easter_date(year.to_i) + (mul * indent.to_i).days
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

        This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

        An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

        Method convert_icon_links_into_images has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def convert_icon_links_into_images
                 uri = URI.join(Rails.application.routes.url_helpers.root_url, "/api/v1/images/create.json")
        
                 links = Link.where(type: ["IconLink", "PhotoLink"]).find_each do |l|
                    url = Addressable::URI.parse(l.url).normalize.to_s
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/lib/tasks.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Block has too many lines. [43/25]
          Open

             scope :with_short_memoes, -> context do
                language_codes = [ context[:locales] ].flatten
                cslugs_rule = context[:calendary_slugs] ? "AND calendary_slugs.text IN ('#{context[:calendary_slugs].join("','")}')" : ""
          
                selector = "COALESCE((WITH __memoes AS (
          Severity: Minor
          Found in app/models/event.rb by rubocop

          This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

          Block has too many lines. [43/25]
          Open

             scope :with_bond_to_year_date, -> context do
                language_codes = [ context[:locales] ].flatten
                alphabeth_codes = Languageble.alphabeth_list_for(language_codes).flatten
                selector = self.select_values.dup
                if selector.empty?
          Severity: Minor
          Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

          This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

          Perceived complexity for dates_to_days is too high. [8/7]
          Open

                def dates_to_days dates_in, julian
                   [dates_in].flatten.map do |date_in|
                      date = date_in.is_a?(Date) && date_in || Date.parse(date_in)
                      new_date = date.strftime('%2d.%m')
                      gap = julian && 13.days || 0
          Severity: Minor
          Found in app/models/memo.rb by rubocop

          This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

          Example:

          def my_method                   # 1
            if cond                       # 1
              case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
              when 1 then func_one
              when 2 then func_two
              when 3 then func_three
              when 4..10 then func_other
              end
            else                          # 1
              do_something until a && b   # 2
            end                           # ===
          end                             # 7 complexity points

          Method has too many lines. [16/15]
          Open

             def set_event
                @events = @memory.events
                                 .memoed_for(@calendary_slugs)
                                 .with_memory(context)
                                 .with_scripta(context)

          This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

          Severity
          Category
          Status
          Source
          Language