Function getEncodedData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static getEncodedData(correctedBits: boolean[]): string {
let endIndex: number = correctedBits.length;
let latchTable = Table.UPPER; // table most recently latched to
let shiftTable = Table.UPPER; // table to use for the next read
let result: string = '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function correctBits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private correctBits(rawbits: boolean[]): boolean[] {
let gf: GenericGF;
let codewordSize: number;
if (this.ddata.getNbLayers() <= 2) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Decoder.ts
has 264 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* Copyright 2010 ZXing authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
Function correctBits
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private correctBits(rawbits: boolean[]): boolean[] {
let gf: GenericGF;
let codewordSize: number;
if (this.ddata.getNbLayers() <= 2) {
Function getEncodedData
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static getEncodedData(correctedBits: boolean[]): string {
let endIndex: number = correctedBits.length;
let latchTable = Table.UPPER; // table most recently latched to
let shiftTable = Table.UPPER; // table to use for the next read
let result: string = '';
Function extractBits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private extractBits(matrix: BitMatrix): boolean[] {
let compact = this.ddata.isCompact();
let layers = this.ddata.getNbLayers();
let baseMatrixSize = (compact ? 11 : 14) + layers * 4; // not including alignment lines
let alignmentMap = new Int32Array(baseMatrixSize);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractBits
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private extractBits(matrix: BitMatrix): boolean[] {
let compact = this.ddata.isCompact();
let layers = this.ddata.getNbLayers();
let baseMatrixSize = (compact ? 11 : 14) + layers * 4; // not including alignment lines
let alignmentMap = new Int32Array(baseMatrixSize);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rawbits[rowOffset + 4 * rowSize + columnOffset + k] =
matrix.get(alignmentMap[high - k], alignmentMap[high - j]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rawbits[rowOffset + 2 * rowSize + columnOffset + k] =
matrix.get(alignmentMap[low + j], alignmentMap[high - k]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76