Function readCodewords
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
readCodewords(): Int8Array {
const result = new Int8Array(this.version.getTotalCodewords());
let resultOffset = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File BitMatrixParser.ts
has 303 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import BitMatrix from '../../common/BitMatrix';
import Version from './Version';
import FormatException from '../../FormatException';
import IllegalArgumentException from '../../IllegalArgumentException';
Function readCodewords
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
readCodewords(): Int8Array {
const result = new Int8Array(this.version.getTotalCodewords());
let resultOffset = 0;
Function extractDataRegion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private extractDataRegion(bitMatrix: BitMatrix): BitMatrix {
const symbolSizeRows = this.version.getSymbolSizeRows();
const symbolSizeColumns = this.version.getSymbolSizeColumns();
if (bitMatrix.getHeight() !== symbolSizeRows) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readCorner4
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner4(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
Function readCorner1
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner1(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 1, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
Function readCorner2
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner2(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
Function readCorner3
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner3(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 1, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
Function readUtah
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readUtah(row: number, column: number, numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(row - 2, column - 2, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
Function extractDataRegion
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private extractDataRegion(bitMatrix: BitMatrix): BitMatrix {
const symbolSizeRows = this.version.getSymbolSizeRows();
const symbolSizeColumns = this.version.getSymbolSizeColumns();
if (bitMatrix.getHeight() !== symbolSizeRows) {
Function readCorner3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner3(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 1, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (bitMatrix.get(readColumnOffset, readRowOffset)) {
const writeColumnOffset = dataRegionColumnOffset + j;
bitMatrixWithoutAlignment.set(writeColumnOffset, writeRowOffset);
}
Function readCorner1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner1(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 1, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readCorner4
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner4(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readCorner2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner2(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readUtah
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readUtah(row: number, column: number, numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(row - 2, column - 2, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ((row === numRows - 2) && (column === 0) && ((numColumns & 0x07) === 4) && !corner4Read) {
result[resultOffset++] = this.readCorner4(numRows, numColumns) & 0xff;
row -= 2;
column += 2;
corner4Read = true;
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner2(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 317.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner4(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 3, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 317.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private readCorner1(numRows: number, numColumns: number): number {
let currentByte = 0;
if (this.readModule(numRows - 1, 0, numRows, numColumns)) {
currentByte |= 1;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 317.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if ((row === numRows - 2) && (column === 0) && ((numColumns & 0x07) === 4) && !corner4Read) {
result[resultOffset++] = this.readCorner4(numRows, numColumns) & 0xff;
row -= 2;
column += 2;
corner4Read = true;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((row === numRows) && (column === 0) && !corner1Read) {
result[resultOffset++] = this.readCorner1(numRows, numColumns) & 0xff;
row -= 2;
column += 2;
corner1Read = true;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if ((row === numRows - 2) && (column === 0) && ((numColumns & 0x03) !== 0) && !corner2Read) {
result[resultOffset++] = this.readCorner2(numRows, numColumns) & 0xff;
row -= 2;
column += 2;
corner2Read = true;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if ((row === numRows + 4) && (column === 2) && ((numColumns & 0x07) === 0) && !corner3Read) {
result[resultOffset++] = this.readCorner3(numRows, numColumns) & 0xff;
row -= 2;
column += 2;
corner3Read = true;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76