18F/domain-scan

View on GitHub

Showing 65 of 65 total issues

File sslyze.py has 706 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

###
# Inspect a site's TLS configuration using sslyze.
#
# If data exists for a domain from `pshtt`, will check results
# and only process domains with valid HTTPS, or broken chains.
Severity: Major
Found in scanners/sslyze.py - About 1 day to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def init_domain(domain, environment, options):
        cache_dir = options.get("_", {}).get("cache_dir", "./cache")
        # If we have data from pshtt, skip if it's not a live domain.
        if utils.domain_not_live(domain):
            logging.debug("\tSkipping, domain not reachable during inspection.")
    Severity: Major
    Found in scanners/third_parties.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    scanners/uswds.py on lines 17..46

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 170.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def init_domain(domain, environment, options):
        cache_dir = options.get("_", {}).get("cache_dir", "./cache")
        # If we have data from pshtt, skip if it's not a live domain.
        if utils.domain_not_live(domain):
            logging.debug("\tSkipping, domain not reachable during inspection.")
    Severity: Major
    Found in scanners/uswds.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    scanners/third_parties.py on lines 17..46

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 170.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Function scan has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def scan(domain: str, environment: dict, options: dict) -> dict:
        logging.debug("Scan function called with options: %s" % options)
    
        results = {}
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in scanners/pagedata.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function scan has a Cognitive Complexity of 59 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def scan(domain: str, environment: dict, options: dict) -> dict:
        logging.debug("Scan function called with options: %s" % options)
    
        # Run sitemap_scan to capture that data
        sitemap_results = sitemap_scan(domain, environment, options)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in scanners/seo.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File scan_utils.py has 534 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    import argparse
    import codecs
    import csv
    import datetime
    import errno
    Severity: Major
    Found in utils/scan_utils.py - About 1 day to fix

      Function analyze_certs has a Cognitive Complexity of 52 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def analyze_certs(certs):
          data = {'certs': {}}
      
          # Served chain.
          served_chain = certs.received_certificate_chain
      Severity: Minor
      Found in scanners/sslyze.py - About 1 day to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      File utils.py has 457 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      import argparse
      import os
      import re
      import errno
      import subprocess
      Severity: Minor
      Found in utils/utils.py - About 7 hrs to fix

        Function scan has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def scan(domain: str, environment: dict, options: dict) -> dict:
            results = {}
            for i in headers:
                results[i] = 0
            results['uswdsversion'] = ""
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scanners/uswds2.py - About 5 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function analyze_protocols_and_ciphers has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def analyze_protocols_and_ciphers(data, sslv2, sslv3, tlsv1, tlsv1_1, tlsv1_2, tlsv1_3):
            data['protocols'] = {
                'sslv2': supported_protocol(sslv2),
                'sslv3': supported_protocol(sslv3),
                'tlsv1.0': supported_protocol(tlsv1),
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scanners/sslyze.py - About 5 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function processUrl has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        var processUrl = (href, sourceHref, data) => {
          if (debug) console.log("URI: " + href);
        
          // Ignore blob: and data: URIs, these do not generate an external request.
          // Catch them before running URL.parse(), since they are not URLs and the
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scanners/third_parties.js - About 5 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function scan_parallel has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def scan_parallel(scanner, server_info, data, options):
            logging.debug("\tRunning scans in parallel.")
        
            def queue(command):
                try:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scanners/sslyze.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function init has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def init(environment, options):
            global redirects
            global config
            cache_dir = options.get("_", {}).get("cache_dir", "./cache")
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scanners/a11y.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function options_for_gather has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def options_for_gather():
            """
            Parse options for the ``gather`` command.
        
            :rtype: dict
        Severity: Minor
        Found in utils/utils.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function processUrl has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        var processUrl = (href, sourceHref, data) => {
          if (debug) console.log("URI: " + href);
        
          // Ignore blob: and data: URIs, these do not generate an external request.
          // Catch them before running URL.parse(), since they are not URLs and the
        Severity: Major
        Found in scanners/third_parties.js - About 2 hrs to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if redirects_file.startswith("http:") or redirects_file.startswith("https:"):
                      redirects_path = os.path.join(cache_dir, "a11y_redirects.yml")
          
                      try:
                          response = requests.get(redirects_file)
          Severity: Major
          Found in scanners/a11y.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          scanners/a11y.py on lines 60..68

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 55.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Function _df_path has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def _df_path(arg: Path, domain_suffix: Union[str, None]=None) -> Iterable[str]:
              if arg.suffix == ".csv":
                  with arg.open(encoding='utf-8', newline='') as csvfile:
                      for row in csv.reader(csvfile):
                          if (not row) or (not row[0]) or (row[0].lower() == "domain") or (row[0].lower() == "domain name"):
          Severity: Minor
          Found in utils/scan_utils.py - About 2 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if config_file.startswith("http:") or config_file.startswith("https:"):
                      config_path = os.path.join(cache_dir, "a11y_config.json")
          
                      try:
                          response = requests.get(config_file)
          Severity: Major
          Found in scanners/a11y.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          scanners/a11y.py on lines 32..40

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 55.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            else {
              hostType = "external";
          
              if (!data.external_urls.includes(href))
                data.external_urls.push(href);
          Severity: Major
          Found in scanners/third_parties.js and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          scanners/third_parties.js on lines 147..155

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 82.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            else if (base_host == source_base) {
              hostType = "nearby";
          
              if (!data.nearby_urls.includes(href))
                data.nearby_urls.push(href);
          Severity: Major
          Found in scanners/third_parties.js and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          scanners/third_parties.js on lines 162..170

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 82.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Severity
          Category
          Status
          Source
          Language