Showing 117 of 117 total issues
Method interpret
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def interpret(parent, keyword, *args, &block)
if args.first.is_a?(Hash)
options = args.first.symbolize_keys
options[:initialcolor] = options.delete(:initial_color) if options.keys.include?(:initial_color)
options[:filetypes] = options.delete(:file_types) if options.keys.include?(:file_types)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method launch
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def launch
root {
title 'Hello, Checkbutton!'
label {
Method set_attribute
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_attribute(attribute, *args)
begin
args = normalize_attribute_arguments(attribute, args)
widget_custom_attribute = widget_custom_attribute_mapping[tk.class] && widget_custom_attribute_mapping[tk.class][attribute.to_s]
if respond_to?(attribute_setter(attribute), super_only: true)
Method show_find_dialog
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show_find_dialog
toplevel(@root) { |tl|
title 'Find'
label {
Method launch
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def launch
root {
title 'Hello, Frame!'
frame { # frame simply contains widgets for visual organization via a layout
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Country', underline: 0) {
['denmark', 'finland', 'france', 'germany', 'italy', 'mexico', 'netherlands', 'norway', 'usa'].each do |image_name|
menu_item(:radiobutton, label: image_name.capitalize) {
selection image_name == 'usa'
image File.expand_path("images/#{image_name}.png", __dir__)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Country', underline: 0) {
['denmark', 'finland', 'france', 'germany', 'italy', 'mexico', 'netherlands', 'norway', 'usa'].each do |image_name|
menu_item(:radiobutton, label: image_name.capitalize) {
selection image_name == 'usa'
image File.expand_path("images/#{image_name}.png", __dir__)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method post_add_content
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_add_content
if escapable?
on('KeyPress') do |event|
if event.state == 0 && event.keysym == 'Escape'
tk.grab_release
Method initialize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
reset_activities!
individual_observer = Glimmer::DataBinding::Observer.proc do
unless @updating_group
@updating_individual = true
Method handle_listener
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_listener(listener_name, &listener)
case listener_name.to_s.downcase
when '<<modified>>', '<modified>', 'modified'
modified_listener = Proc.new do |*args|
@modified_count ||= 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Language', underline: 3) {
['denmark', 'finland', 'france', 'germany', 'italy', 'mexico', 'netherlands', 'norway', 'usa'].each do |image_name|
menu_item(:radiobutton, label: image_name.capitalize) {
selection image_name == 'usa'
image File.expand_path("images/#{image_name}.png", __dir__)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Language', underline: 3) {
['denmark', 'finland', 'france', 'germany', 'italy', 'mexico', 'netherlands', 'norway', 'usa'].each do |image_name|
menu_item(:radiobutton, label: image_name.capitalize) {
selection image_name == 'usa'
image File.expand_path("images/#{image_name}.png", __dir__)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method launch
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def launch
root {
title 'Hello, Spinbox!'
label {
Method handle_listener
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_listener(listener_name, &listener)
listener_name = listener_name.to_s
# TODO return a listener registration object that has a deregister method
if listener_name == 'destroy'
# 'destroy' is a more reliable alternative listener binding to '<Destroy>'
Method show_find_dialog
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show_find_dialog
toplevel(@root) { |tl|
title 'Find'
label {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method font=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def font=(value)
if (value.is_a?(Symbol) || value.is_a?(String)) && FONTS_PREDEFINED.include?(value.to_s.downcase)
@tk.font = "tk_#{value}_font".camelcase(:upper)
else
@tk.font = value.is_a?(TkFont) ? value : TkFont.new(value)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_attribute
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_attribute(attribute, *args)
case attribute.to_s
when 'yscrollbar'
@yscrollbar = args.first
if @yscrollbar == true
Method grid
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def grid(options = {})
@_visible = true
options = options.stringify_keys
options['rowspan'] = options.delete('row_span') if options.keys.include?('row_span')
options['columnspan'] = options.delete('column_span') if options.keys.include?('column_span')
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Edit', underline: 0) {
menu_item(label: 'Cut', underline: 2) {
accelerator OS.mac? ? 'Command+X' : 'Control+X'
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
menu(label: 'Edit', underline: 0) {
menu_item(label: 'Cut', underline: 2) {
accelerator OS.mac? ? 'Command+X' : 'Control+X'
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76