File chart_data_values.rb
has 498 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
class ChartDataValues
attr_reader :anaylsis_type, :title, :subtitle, :chart1_type, :chart1_subtype,
:y_axis_label, :x_axis_label, :x_axis_categories, :x_max_value, :x_min_value,
:advice_header, :advice_footer, :y2_axis_label, :y2_point_format, :y2_max, :x_axis_ranges, :annotations,
:transformations, :allowed_operations, :drilldown_available, :parent_timescale_description,
Class ChartDataValues
has 51 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ChartDataValues
attr_reader :anaylsis_type, :title, :subtitle, :chart1_type, :chart1_subtype,
:y_axis_label, :x_axis_label, :x_axis_categories, :x_max_value, :x_min_value,
:advice_header, :advice_footer, :y2_axis_label, :y2_point_format, :y2_max, :x_axis_ranges, :annotations,
:transformations, :allowed_operations, :drilldown_available, :parent_timescale_description,
Method process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process
return self if @chart.nil?
@x_data_hash = reverse_x_data_if_required
@series_data = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method column_or_bar
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_or_bar
@series_data = @x_data_hash.each_with_index.map do |(data_type, data), index|
data_type = tidy_label(data_type)
colour = work_out_best_colour(data_type)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method series_translation_key_lookup
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def series_translation_key_lookup
@series_translation_key_lookup ||= {
Series::DegreeDays::DEGREEDAYS => Series::DegreeDays::DEGREEDAYS_I18N_KEY,
Series::Temperature::TEMPERATURE => Series::Temperature::TEMPERATURE_I18N_KEY,
Series::DayType::SCHOOLDAYCLOSED => Series::DayType::SCHOOLDAYCLOSED_I18N_KEY,
Method initialize
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(chart, chart_type, transformations: [], allowed_operations: {}, drilldown_available: false, parent_timescale_description: nil, y1_axis_choices: [])
if chart
@chart_type = chart_type
@chart = chart
@title = chart[:title]
Method as_chart_json
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.as_chart_json(output)
[
:title,
:subtitle,
:chart1_type,
Method teachers_chart_colour
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
def teachers_chart_colour(index)
if @chart_type.match?(/_gas_/)
index.zero? ? Colours.chart_gas_dark : Colours.chart_gas_light
elsif @chart_type.match?(/_storage_/)
index.zero? ? Colours.chart_storage_dark : Colours.chart_storage_light
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method benchmark_colour
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def benchmark_colour(data_type, category)
# this has multiple fuel types
if [:benchmark, :benchmark_one_year].include?(@chart_type)
return colours_for_multiple_fuel_type_benchmark(data_type, category)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method translated_series_item_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def translated_series_item_for(series_key_as_string)
series_key_as_string = series_key_as_string.to_s
return I18n.t('analytics.series_data_manager.series_name.baseload') if series_key_as_string.casecmp('baseload').zero?
return I18n.t('advice_pages.benchmarks.benchmark_school') if series_key_as_string == 'benchmark'
return I18n.t('advice_pages.benchmarks.exemplar_school') if series_key_as_string == 'exemplar'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method colours_for_multiple_fuel_type_benchmark
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def colours_for_multiple_fuel_type_benchmark(data_type, category)
case data_type
when translated_series_item_for('Gas')
if benchmark_school_category?(category)
Colours.chart_gas_middle
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return series_key_as_string unless i18n_key
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return translate_bill_component_series(series_key_as_string) if I18n.t('advice_pages.tables.labels.bill_components').keys.map(&:to_s).include?(series_key_as_string)
Method series_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def series_data
return @series_data unless @series_data.is_a? Array
# Temporary TOFIX TODO as analytics should not return negative values
@series_data.map do |series|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method label_point_and_max_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def label_point_and_max_for(y2_data_title)
if y2_is_temperature?(y2_data_title)
['°C', '{point.y:.2f} °C',]
elsif y2_is_degree_days?(y2_data_title)
[
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def sort_out_dates_when_tidying_labels(current_label)
date_to_and_from = current_label.scan(/\d+|[A-Za-z]+/).drop(1).each_slice(4).to_a
if date_to_and_from.size > 1 && date_to_and_from[0][3] != date_to_and_from[1][3]
date_to_and_from[0].delete_at(0)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76