Showing 7,504 of 7,504 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
library.validator = function( attachment ) {
return !! this.mirroring.get( attachment.cid ) && ! edit.get( attachment.cid ) && media.model.Selection.prototype.validator.apply( this, arguments );
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var Try = {
these: function() {
var returnValue;
for (var i = 0, length = arguments.length; i < length; i++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!edCheckOpenTags(i) || edButtons[i].tagEnd == '') {
myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos)
+ edButtons[i].tagStart
+ myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length);
edAddTag(i);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
library.validator = function( attachment ) {
return !! this.mirroring.get( attachment.cid ) && ! edit.get( attachment.cid ) && media.model.Selection.prototype.validator.apply( this, arguments );
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else {
myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos)
+ edButtons[i].tagEnd
+ myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length);
edRemoveTag(i);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File Locator.php
has 289 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* SimplePie
*
* A PHP-Based RSS and Atom Feed Framework.
Function updateText
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function updateText() {
var attemptedDate, originalDate, currentDate, publishOn, postStatus = $('#post_status'),
optPublish = $('option[value=publish]', postStatus), aa = $('#aa').val(),
mm = $('#mm').val(), jj = $('#jj').val(), hh = $('#hh').val(), mn = $('#mn').val();
Function addMethods
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Element.addMethods = function(methods) {
var F = Prototype.BrowserFeatures, T = Element.Methods.ByTag;
if (!methods) {
Object.extend(Form, Form.Methods);
Function addMethods
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Element.addMethods = function(methods) {
var F = Prototype.BrowserFeatures, T = Element.Methods.ByTag;
if (!methods) {
Object.extend(Form, Form.Methods);
Method bulk_edit_posts
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function bulk_edit_posts( $post_data = null ) {
global $wpdb;
if ( empty($post_data) )
$post_data = &$_POST;
Method link_xfn_meta_box
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function link_xfn_meta_box($link) {
?>
<table class="editform" style="width: 100%;" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
<th style="width: 20%;" scope="row"><label for="link_rel"><?php /* translators: xfn: http://gmpg.org/xfn/ */ _e('rel:') ?></label></th>
Method dispatch
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dispatch()
{
if (empty ($_GET['step']))
$step = 0;
Function keyHandler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
keyHandler : function(evt) {
keyCode = evt.keyCode;
charCode = evt.charCode;
fromChar = String.fromCharCode(charCode);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function edInsertTag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function edInsertTag(myField, i) {
//IE support
if (document.selection) {
myField.focus();
var sel = document.selection.createRange();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dirlist
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirlist($path = '.', $include_hidden = true, $recursive = false ) {
if ( $this->is_file($path) ) {
$limit_file = basename($path);
$path = dirname($path) . '/';
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prepare_items
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function prepare_items() {
global $status, $totals, $page, $orderby, $order, $s;
wp_reset_vars( array( 'orderby', 'order', 's' ) );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function favorite_actions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function favorite_actions( $screen = null ) {
switch ( $screen ) {
case 'post-new.php':
$default_action = array('edit.php' => array(__('Edit Posts'), 'edit_posts'));
break;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _page_rows
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _page_rows( &$children_pages, &$count, $parent, $level, $pagenum, $per_page ) {
if ( ! isset( $children_pages[$parent] ) )
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function wp_doc_link_parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_doc_link_parse( $content ) {
if ( !is_string( $content ) || empty( $content ) )
return array();
if ( !function_exists('token_get_all') )
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function step1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function step1() {
global $verified;
set_time_limit( 0 );
update_option( 'ljapi_step', 1 );
if ( !$this->ixr ) $this->ixr = new IXR_Client( $this->ixr_url, false, 80, 30 );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"