File SlangCompilerImpl.java
has 421 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*******************************************************************************
* (c) Copyright 2016 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Apache License v2.0 which accompany this distribution.
*
SlangCompilerImpl
has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class SlangCompilerImpl implements SlangCompiler {
public static final String NOT_A_VALID_SYSTEM_PROPERTY_FILE_ERROR_MESSAGE_SUFFIX =
"is not a valid system property file.";
public static final String ERROR_LOADING_PROPERTIES_FILE_MESSAGE =
Method convertRawProperties
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<Map<String, Object>> convertRawProperties(Object propertiesAsObject, SlangSource source,
List<RuntimeException> exceptions) {
List<Map<String, Object>> convertedProperties = new ArrayList<>();
if (propertiesAsObject != null) {
if (propertiesAsObject instanceof List) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convertRawProperties
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<Map<String, Object>> convertRawProperties(Object propertiesAsObject, SlangSource source,
List<RuntimeException> exceptions) {
List<Map<String, Object>> convertedProperties = new ArrayList<>();
if (propertiesAsObject != null) {
if (propertiesAsObject instanceof List) {
Method transformSystemProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private SystemProperty transformSystemProperty(
String rawNamespace,
String key,
Object rawValue,
String description) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extractProperties
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private SystemPropertyModellingResult extractProperties(ParsedSlang parsedSlang, SlangSource source,
List<RuntimeException> exceptions) {
Set<SystemProperty> modelledSystemProperties = new HashSet<>();
Set<String> modelledSystemPropertyKeys = new HashSet<>();
Method transformSystemProperty
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private SystemProperty transformSystemProperty(
String rawNamespace,
String key,
Object rawValue,
String description) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (propertyAsMap.size() == 1) {
Map.Entry propertyAsEntry = (Map.Entry) propertyAsMap.entrySet().iterator().next();
Object propertyKeyAsObject = propertyAsEntry.getKey();
if (propertyKeyAsObject instanceof String) {
Map<String, Object> convertedProperty = new HashMap<>();
Method extractProperties
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private SystemPropertyModellingResult extractProperties(ParsedSlang parsedSlang, SlangSource source,
List<RuntimeException> exceptions) {
Set<SystemProperty> modelledSystemProperties = new HashSet<>();
Set<String> modelledSystemPropertyKeys = new HashSet<>();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (String modifierKey : modifiers.keySet()) {
if (!knownModifierKeys.contains(modifierKey)) {
throw new RuntimeException(
"Artifact {" + key + "} has unrecognized tag {" + modifierKey + "}" +
". Please take a look at the supported features per versions link");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76