Showing 611 of 611 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, c.prototype.attachmentEditorDidRequestRemovingAttributeForAttachment = function(t3, e2) {
var n2;
return (n2 = this.delegate) != null && typeof n2.compositionControllerWillUpdateAttachment == "function" && n2.compositionControllerWillUpdateAttachment(e2), this.composition.removeAttributeForAttachment(t3, e2);
}, c.prototype.attachmentEditorDidRequestRemovalOfAttachment = function(t3) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (i2 && i2.type === "childList" && i2.addedNodes && i2.addedNodes) {
for (var o2 = i2.addedNodes[0]; o2 && o2 !== document && !o2.host; )
o2 = o2.parentNode;
var r2 = o2 && (o2.URL || o2._URL || o2.host && o2.host.localName) || "";
r2 = r2.split("/?").shift().split("/").pop();Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
*/},{key:"open",value:function open(t,i){var n=this;if(!(this.$element.hasClass("is-open")||this.isRevealed||this.isInCanvas)){var s=this;i&&(this.$lastTrigger=i);"top"===this.options.forceTo?window.scrollTo(0,0):"bottom"===this.options.forceTo&&window.scrollTo(0,document.body.scrollHeight);this.options.transitionTime&&"overlap"!==this.options.transition?this.$element.siblings("[data-off-canvas-content]").css("transition-duration",this.options.transitionTime):this.$element.siblings("[data-off-canvas-content]").css("transition-duration","");this.$element.addClass("is-open").removeClass("is-closed");this.$triggers.attr("aria-expanded","true");this.$element.attr("aria-hidden","false");this.$content.addClass("is-open-"+this.position);if(false===this.options.contentScroll){e("body").addClass("is-off-canvas-open").on("touchmove",this._stopScrolling);this.$element.on("touchstart",this._recordScrollable);this.$element.on("touchmove",this,this._preventDefaultAtEdges);this.$element.on("touchstart","[data-off-canvas-scrollbox]",this._recordScrollable);this.$element.on("touchmove","[data-off-canvas-scrollbox]",this,this._scrollboxTouchMoved)}true===this.options.contentOverlay&&this.$overlay.addClass("is-visible");true===this.options.closeOnClick&&true===this.options.contentOverlay&&this.$overlay.addClass("is-closable");true===this.options.autoFocus&&this.$element.one(transitionend(this.$element),(function(){if(s.$element.hasClass("is-open")){var e=s.$element.find("[data-autofocus]");e.length?e.eq(0).focus():s.$element.find("a, button").eq(0).focus()}}));if(true===this.options.trapFocus){this.$content.attr("tabindex","-1");l.trapFocus(this.$element)}"push"===this.options.transition&&this._fixStickyElements();this._addContentClasses();this.$element.trigger("opened.zf.offCanvas");this.$element.one(transitionend(this.$element),(function(){n.$element.trigger("openedEnd.zf.offCanvas")}))}}Function validateModifiers has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function validateModifiers(modifiers) {
modifiers.forEach(function(modifier) {
[].concat(Object.keys(modifier), VALID_PROPERTIES).filter(function(value, index, self) {
return self.indexOf(value) === index;
}).forEach(function(key) {Method definition has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.definition(q, options = {})
Elasticsearch::DSL::Search.search do
sort do
by '_score' if options[:sort_by] == 'score'
by :published_at, order: 'desc'Function G has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
useMUI:true};var N={dropdown:{cssClass:"dropdown",plugin:H},drilldown:{cssClass:"drilldown",plugin:A},accordion:{cssClass:"accordion-menu",plugin:O}};var G=function(t){_inherits(ResponsiveMenu,t);var n=_createSuper(ResponsiveMenu);function ResponsiveMenu(){_classCallCheck(this,ResponsiveMenu);return n.apply(this,arguments)}_createClass(ResponsiveMenu,[{key:"_setup",value:
/**
* Creates a new instance of a responsive menu.
* @class
* @name ResponsiveMenu- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addToJquery has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
reflow:function reflow(t,i){"undefined"===typeof i?i=Object.keys(this._plugins):"string"===typeof i&&(i=[i]);var n=this;e.each(i,(function(i,s){var a=n._plugins[s];var o=e(t).find("[data-"+s+"]").addBack("[data-"+s+"]").filter((function(){return"undefined"===typeof e(this).data("zfPlugin")}));o.each((function(){var t=e(this),i={reflow:true};t.attr("data-options")&&t.attr("data-options").split(";").forEach((function(e){var t=e.split(":").map((function(e){return e.trim()}));t[0]&&(i[t[0]]=parseValue(t[1]))}));try{t.data("zfPlugin",new a(e(this),i))}catch(e){console.error(e)}finally{return}}))}))},getFnName:functionName,addToJquery:function addToJquery(){
/**
* The Foundation jQuery method.
* @param {String|Array} method - An action to perform on the current jQuery object.
*/- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolveIfNotPlainOrUrl has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function resolveIfNotPlainOrUrl (relUrl, parentUrl) {
// strip off any trailing query params or hashes
const queryHashIndex = parentUrl.indexOf('?', parentUrl.indexOf('#') === -1 ? parentUrl.indexOf('#') : parentUrl.length);
if (queryHashIndex !== -1)
parentUrl = parentUrl.slice(0, queryHashIndex);Function remove has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
var j, handleObj, tmp,
origCount, t, events,
special, handlers, type,
namespaces, origType,Function Piece has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
e.Piece = function(n2) {
function i(t3, n3) {
n3 == null && (n3 = {}), i.__super__.constructor.apply(this, arguments), this.attributes = e.Hash.box(n3);
}
return t2(i, n2), i.types = {}, i.registerType = function(t3, e2) {Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, d.prototype.attachmentDidChangePreviewURL = function(t3) {
var e2;
return this.revision++, (e2 = this.delegate) != null && typeof e2.compositionDidChangeAttachmentPreviewURL == "function" ? e2.compositionDidChangeAttachmentPreviewURL(t3) : void 0;
}, d.prototype.editAttachment = function(t3, e2) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
*/},{key:"_setCurrentAnchor",value:function _setCurrentAnchor(t){this.$currentAnchor=e(t)}},{key:"_events",value:function _events(){var t=this,i="ontouchstart"in window||"undefined"!==typeof window.ontouchstart;this.$element.on({"open.zf.trigger":this.open.bind(this),"close.zf.trigger":this.close.bind(this),"toggle.zf.trigger":this.toggle.bind(this),"resizeme.zf.trigger":this._setPosition.bind(this)});this.$anchors.off("click.zf.trigger").on("click.zf.trigger",(function(e){t._setCurrentAnchor(this);(false===t.options.forceFollow||i&&t.options.hover&&false===t.$element.hasClass("is-open"))&&e.preventDefault()}));if(this.options.hover){this.$anchors.off("mouseenter.zf.dropdown mouseleave.zf.dropdown").on("mouseenter.zf.dropdown",(function(){t._setCurrentAnchor(this);var i=e("body").data();if("undefined"===typeof i.whatinput||"mouse"===i.whatinput){clearTimeout(t.timeout);t.timeout=setTimeout((function(){t.open();t.$anchors.data("hover",true)}),t.options.hoverDelay)}})).on("mouseleave.zf.dropdown",ignoreMousedisappear((function(){clearTimeout(t.timeout);t.timeout=setTimeout((function(){t.close();t.$anchors.data("hover",false)}),t.options.hoverDelay)})));this.options.hoverPane&&this.$element.off("mouseenter.zf.dropdown mouseleave.zf.dropdown").on("mouseenter.zf.dropdown",(function(){clearTimeout(t.timeout)})).on("mouseleave.zf.dropdown",ignoreMousedisappear((function(){clearTimeout(t.timeout);t.timeout=setTimeout((function(){t.close();t.$anchors.data("hover",false)}),t.options.hoverDelay)})))}this.$anchors.add(this.$element).on("keydown.zf.dropdown",(function(i){var n=e(this);l.handleKey(i,"Dropdown",{open:function open(){if(n.is(t.$anchors)&&!n.is("input, textarea")){t.open();t.$element.attr("tabindex",-1).focus();i.preventDefault()}},close:function close(){t.close();t.$anchors.focus()}})}))}},{key:"_addBodyHandler",value:function _addBodyHandler(){var t=e(document.body).not(this.$element),i=this;t.off("click.zf.dropdown tap.zf.dropdown").on("click.zf.dropdown tap.zf.dropdown",(function(e){if(!i.$anchors.is(e.target)&&!i.$anchors.find(e.target).length&&!i.$element.is(e.target)&&!i.$element.find(e.target).length){i.close();t.off("click.zf.dropdown tap.zf.dropdown")}}))}},{key:"open",value:function open(){this.$element.trigger("closeme.zf.dropdown",this.$element.attr("id"));this.$anchors.addClass("hover").attr({"aria-expanded":true});this.$element.addClass("is-opening");this._setPosition();this.$element.removeClass("is-opening").addClass("is-open").attr({"aria-hidden":false});if(this.options.autoFocus){var e=l.findFocusable(this.$element);e.length&&e.eq(0).focus()}this.options.closeOnClick&&this._addBodyHandler();this.options.trapFocus&&l.trapFocus(this.$element);this.$element.trigger("show.zf.dropdown",[this.$element])}},{key:"close",value:function close(){if(!this.$element.hasClass("is-open"))return false;this.$element.removeClass("is-open").attr({"aria-hidden":true});this.$anchors.removeClass("hover").attr("aria-expanded",false);this.$element.trigger("hide.zf.dropdown",[this.$element]);this.options.trapFocus&&l.releaseFocus(this.$element)}},{key:"toggle",value:function toggle(){if(this.$element.hasClass("is-open")){if(this.$anchors.data("hover"))return;this.close()}else this.open()}},{key:"_destroy",value:function _destroy(){this.$element.off(".zf.trigger").hide();this.$anchors.off(".zf.dropdown");e(document.body).off("click.zf.dropdown tap.zf.dropdown")}}]);return Dropdown}(R);D.defaults={- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, d.prototype.attachmentDidChangeAttributes = function(t3) {
var e2;
return this.revision++, (e2 = this.delegate) != null && typeof e2.compositionDidEditAttachment == "function" ? e2.compositionDidEditAttachment(t3) : void 0;
}, d.prototype.attachmentDidChangePreviewURL = function(t3) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, r = {}.hasOwnProperty, s = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, s = {}.hasOwnProperty, a = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, n = {}.hasOwnProperty, i = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var t2, n, i, o, r, s = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, s = {}.hasOwnProperty, a = [].slice, u = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, c = {}.hasOwnProperty, l = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, o = {}.hasOwnProperty, r = [].indexOf || function(t3) {
for (var e2 = 0, n2 = this.length; n2 > e2; e2++)
if (e2 in this && this[e2] === t3)
return e2;
return -1;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76