CommunityGrows/communitygrows

View on GitHub

Showing 187 of 187 total issues

Possible XSS vulnerability with certain configurations of rails-html-sanitizer
Open

    rails-html-sanitizer (1.0.3)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-23519

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/rails/rails-html-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-9h9g-93gc-623h

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.4.4

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_doccom_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb and 3 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 18..30
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 59..71
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 75..87

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 91.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_doccom_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb and 3 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 2..14
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 59..71
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 75..87

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 91.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_announcement_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb and 3 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 2..14
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 18..30
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 75..87

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 91.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_announcement_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_update_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb and 3 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 2..14
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 18..30
app/helpers/email_helper.rb on lines 59..71

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 91.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method has too many lines. [36/30]
Open

    def create
        @title = event_params[:title]
        @location = event_params[:location]
        @description = event_params[:description]
        @date = event_params[:date]

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for update is too high. [12/6]
Open

    def update
        @event = Event.find params[:id]
        @title = event_params[:title]
        @date = event_params[:date]
        if @title.empty?

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for create is too high. [12/6]
Open

    def create
        @title = event_params[:title]
        @location = event_params[:location]
        @description = event_params[:description]
        @date = event_params[:date]

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for send_announcement_update_email is too high. [10/6]
Open

    def send_announcement_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_update_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for send_doccom_email is too high. [10/6]
Open

    def send_doccom_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for send_doccom_update_email is too high. [10/6]
Open

    def send_doccom_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for send_announcement_email is too high. [10/6]
Open

    def send_announcement_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method has too many lines. [34/30]
Open

    def update
        @event = Event.find params[:id]
        @title = event_params[:title]
        @date = event_params[:date]
        if @title.empty?

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for create_category is too high. [7/6]
Open

    def create_category
        if !current_user.admin
            flash[:message] = "Only admins can create categories."
            redirect_to root_path and return
        end

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for update_category is too high. [7/6]
Open

    def update_category
        if !current_user.admin
            flash[:message] = "Only admins can create categories."
            redirect_to root_path and return
        end

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method send_doccom_update_email has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_doccom_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method send_announcement_update_email has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_announcement_update_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_update_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method send_announcement_email has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_announcement_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.announcement_email(user, Announcement.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method send_doccom_email has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def send_doccom_email(committee, title)
        User.all.each do |user|
            if current_user.admin?
                NotificationMailer.document_update_email(user, Document.find_by_title(title)).deliver
            elsif (committee == "internal" and user.internal?) or (committee == "external" and user.external?) or (committee == "executive" and user.executive?)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/email_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def create
        @title = event_params[:title]
        @location = event_params[:location]
        @description = event_params[:description]
        @date = event_params[:date]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/events_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix
    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language