Function walk_rules_parallel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def walk_rules_parallel(args, left_rules, right_rules, oval_func, remediation_func):
"""
Walks two sets of known_rules (left_rules and right_rules) with identical
keys and returns left_only, right_only, and common_only output from
_walk_rule. If the outputted data for a rule when called on left_rules and
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _walk_rule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _walk_rule(args, rule_obj, oval_func, remediation_func, verbose_output):
"""
Walks a single rule and updates verbose_output if visited. Returns visited
state as a boolean.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function walk_rules_diff
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def walk_rules_diff(args, left_rules, right_rules, oval_func, remediation_func):
Function walk_rules_parallel
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def walk_rules_parallel(args, left_rules, right_rules, oval_func, remediation_func):
Function _walk_rule
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _walk_rule(args, rule_obj, oval_func, remediation_func, verbose_output):
Function product_names_remediation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def product_names_remediation(rule_obj, r_type):
"""
For a rule_obj, check the scope of the platforms versus the product name
of the remediations of type r_type.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function filter_rule_ids
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filter_rule_ids(all_keys, queries):
"""
From a set of queries (a comma separated list of queries, where a query is either a
rule id or a substring thereof), return the set of matching keys from all_keys. When
queries is the literal string "all", return all of the keys.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function product_names_oval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def product_names_oval(rule_obj):
"""
For a rule_obj, check the scope of the platforms versus the product name
of the OVAL objects.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 24 to the 15 allowed. Open
def walk_rules_parallel(args, left_rules, right_rules, oval_func, remediation_func):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for rule_id in sorted(verbose_output):
rule_output = verbose_output[rule_id]
_results = walk_rule_stats(rule_output)
affected_ovals += _results[0]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for rule_id in sorted(verbose_output):
rule_output = verbose_output[rule_id]
results = walk_rule_stats(rule_output)
affected_ovals += results[0]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Line too long (104 > 99 characters) Open
return "\trule_id:%s has a different product and %s remediation names: %s is not %s" % \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.