Showing 456 of 456 total issues
Nokogiri gem contains two upstream vulnerabilities in libxslt 1.1.29 Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2017-5029
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1634
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.7.2
Nokogiri gem, via libxml, is affected by DoS vulnerabilities Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2017-15412
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1714
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.8.2
XML Injection in Xerces Java affects Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-23437
Criticality: Medium
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-xxx9-3xcr-gjj3
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
Nokogiri::XML::Schema trusts input by default, exposing risk of an XXE vulnerability Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-26247
Criticality: Low
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-vr8q-g5c7-m54m
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.11.0.rc4
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-24836
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-crjr-9rc5-ghw8
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
Nokogiri gem, via libxml, is affected by DoS and RCE vulnerabilities Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2017-9050
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1673
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.8.1
Nokogiri gem, via libxslt, is affected by improper access control vulnerability Open
nokogiri (1.6.8.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2019-11068
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1892
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.10.3
Method diff_db
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff_db(qset_json)
diffs = []
qset_json.each do |qset_name, question_json|
question_set = QuestionSet.find_by_name(qset_name)
if not question_set
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_tags_exist
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.check_tags_exist(file_qsets)
non_exist_tags = []
file_qsets.keys.each do |qset_name|
question_hash = file_qsets[qset_name]
question_hash.each do |question_text, wrong_answer_list|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_edits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_edits(wrong_answer_list)
db_display_list = {} # wrong answers shown (edited or deleted)
upload_display_list = {} #wrong answers shown (edited or added)
db_wrong_answer_list = self.wrong_answers
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for diff_db is too high. [9/6] Open
def diff_db(qset_json)
diffs = []
qset_json.each do |qset_name, question_json|
question_set = QuestionSet.find_by_name(qset_name)
if not question_set
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for path_to is too high. [9/6] Open
def path_to(page_name)
case page_name
when /^the home\s?page$/
'/'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method has too many lines. [32/30] Open
def diff_db(qset_json)
diffs = []
qset_json.each do |qset_name, question_json|
question_set = QuestionSet.find_by_name(qset_name)
if not question_set
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for import is too high. [7/6] Open
def self.import(csv_path)
rows = CSV.read(csv_path)
if not self.verify_first_line(rows[0])
return false
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for find_edits is too high. [7/6] Open
def find_edits(wrong_answer_list)
db_display_list = {} # wrong answers shown (edited or deleted)
upload_display_list = {} #wrong answers shown (edited or added)
db_wrong_answer_list = self.wrong_answers
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method toggle_admin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def toggle_admin(id, status)
if id == self.id
return "Cannot unadmin yourself"
else
other_user = User.find_by_id(id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method diff_db
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff_db(qset_json)
diffs = []
qset_json.each do |qset_name, question_json|
question_set = QuestionSet.find_by_name(qset_name)
if not question_set
Method import
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.import(csv_path)
rows = CSV.read(csv_path)
if not self.verify_first_line(rows[0])
return false
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cross_check_diffs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.cross_check_diffs(file_qsets)
#Returns a hash of answers, edits, deletions. Answers and edits contains
#a message, which may be an empty string if we do not want to create a new message
edits = {}
additions = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_edits
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_edits(wrong_answer_list)
db_display_list = {} # wrong answers shown (edited or deleted)
upload_display_list = {} #wrong answers shown (edited or added)
db_wrong_answer_list = self.wrong_answers