Sign upLogin

FezVrasta/popper.js

View on GitHub
Star
packages/react/src/inner.ts

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function useInnerOffset has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export function useInnerOffset(
  context: FloatingContext,
  props: UseInnerOffsetProps,
): ElementProps {
  const {open, elements} = context;
Severity: Major
Found in packages/react/src/inner.ts - About 3 hrs to fix

Function fn has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  async fn(state) {
    const {
      listRef,
      overflowRef,
      onFallbackChange,
Severity: Major
Found in packages/react/src/inner.ts - About 3 hrs to fix

Function inner has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export const inner = (
  props: InnerProps & Partial<DetectOverflowOptions>,
): Middleware => ({
  name: 'inner',
  options: props,
Severity: Minor
Found in packages/react/src/inner.ts - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status