Sign upLogin

Fs02/rel

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 34 of 45 total issues

File repository.go has 794 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package rel

import (
    "context"
    "errors"
Severity: Major
Found in repository.go - About 1 day to fix

    Function convertAssign has 136 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func convertAssign(dest, src interface{}) error {
    // Common cases, without reflect.
    switch s := src.(type) {
    case string:
        switch d := dest.(type) {
    Severity: Major
    Found in convert.go - About 4 hrs to fix

      FilterQuery has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      type FilterQuery struct {
    Type  FilterOp
    Field string
    Value interface{}
    Inner []FilterQuery
      Severity: Minor
      Found in filter_query.go - About 4 hrs to fix

        Function convertAssign has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        func convertAssign(dest, src interface{}) error {
    // Common cases, without reflect.
    switch s := src.(type) {
    case string:
        switch d := dest.(type) {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in convert.go - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Builder has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        type Builder struct {
    config      Config
    returnField string
    count       int
}
        Severity: Minor
        Found in adapter/sql/builder.go - About 3 hrs to fix

          Query has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          type Query struct {
    empty         bool // TODO: use bitmask to mark what is updated and use it when merging two queries
    Table         string
    SelectQuery   SelectQuery
    JoinQuery     []JoinQuery
          Severity: Minor
          Found in query.go - About 2 hrs to fix

            Function preload has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            func preload(target slice, result slice, path []string) {
    type frame struct {
        index int
        doc   *rel.Document
    }
            Severity: Minor
            Found in reltest/preload.go - About 2 hrs to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function convertAssign has 28 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
            Open

            func convertAssign(dest, src interface{}) error {
    // Common cases, without reflect.
    switch s := src.(type) {
    case string:
        switch d := dest.(type) {
            Severity: Major
            Found in convert.go - About 2 hrs to fix

              Document has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              type Document struct {
    v    interface{}
    rv   reflect.Value
    rt   reflect.Type
    data documentData
              Severity: Minor
              Found in document.go - About 2 hrs to fix

                Method repository.mapPreloadTargets has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func (r repository) mapPreloadTargets(sl slice, path []string) (map[interface{}][]slice, string, string, reflect.Type, documentData, bool) {
    type frame struct {
        index int
        doc   *Document
    }
                Severity: Major
                Found in repository.go - About 2 hrs to fix

                  Method repository.saveHasMany has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  func (r repository) saveHasMany(cw contextWrapper, doc *Document, mutation *Mutation, insertion bool) error {
    for _, field := range doc.HasMany() {
        assocMuts, changed := mutation.Assoc[field]
        if !changed {
            continue
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in repository.go - About 2 hrs to fix

                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    func (a *Adapter) Commit(ctx context.Context) error {
    var err error

    finish := a.Instrumenter.Observe(ctx, "adapter-commit", "commit transaction")
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in adapter/sql/adapter.go and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                    adapter/sql/adapter.go on lines 220..236

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 193.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    func (a *Adapter) Rollback(ctx context.Context) error {
    var err error

    finish := a.Instrumenter.Observe(ctx, "adapter-rollback", "rollback transaction")
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in adapter/sql/adapter.go and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                    adapter/sql/adapter.go on lines 201..217

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 193.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    Function preload has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    func preload(target slice, result slice, path []string) {
    type frame struct {
        index int
        doc   *rel.Document
    }
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in reltest/preload.go - About 1 hr to fix

                      Function extractAssociationData has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                      func extractAssociationData(rt reflect.Type, index int) associationData {
    var (
        key = associationKey{
            rt:    rt,
            index: index,
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in association.go - About 1 hr to fix

                        Method Changeset.applyAssocMany has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                        func (c Changeset) applyAssocMany(field string, mut *Mutation) {
    if chs, ok := c.assocMany[field]; ok {
        var (
            assoc      = c.doc.Association(field)
            col, _     = assoc.Collection()
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in changeset.go - About 55 mins to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Method Map.Apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                        func (m Map) Apply(doc *Document, mutation *Mutation) {
    var (
        pField = doc.PrimaryField()
        pValue = doc.PrimaryValue()
    )
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in map.go - About 55 mins to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                case reflect.Uint, reflect.Uint8, reflect.Uint16, reflect.Uint32, reflect.Uint64:
            u64, err := strconv.ParseUint(s, 10, dv.Type().Bits())
            if err != nil {
                // The errors that ParseUint returns have concrete type *NumError
                err = err.(*strconv.NumError).Err
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in convert.go and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                        convert.go on lines 141..149

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 120.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                case reflect.Int, reflect.Int8, reflect.Int16, reflect.Int32, reflect.Int64:
            i64, err := strconv.ParseInt(s, 10, dv.Type().Bits())
            if err != nil {
                // The errors that ParseInt returns have concrete type *NumError
                err = err.(*strconv.NumError).Err
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in convert.go and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                        convert.go on lines 150..158

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 120.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                    if assocs.Type() == HasMany {
                var (
                    col, loaded = assocs.Collection()
                )
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in repository.go and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                        reltest/preload.go on lines 130..153

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 119.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Severity
                        Category
                        Status
                        Source
                        Language