Showing 605 of 605 total issues
Function evaluate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UnionExpr.prototype.evaluate = function(ctx) {
var nodes1 = this.expr1.evaluate(ctx).nodeSetValue();
var nodes2 = this.expr2.evaluate(ctx).nodeSetValue();
var I1 = nodes1.length;
for (var i2 = 0; i2 < nodes2.length; ++i2) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var i = 0; i < n.length; ++i) {
var nn = xmlValue(n[i]) - 0;
if (cmp(nn, s)) {
ret = true;
break;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
else if (regObjArr[i].expressInstall && !isExpressInstallActive && hasPlayerVersion("6.0.65") && (ua.win || ua.mac)) { // Show the Adobe Express Install dialog if set by the web page author and if supported (fp6.0.65+ on Win/Mac OS only)
showExpressInstall(regObjArr[i]);
}
else { // Flash plug-in and Flash content version mismatch: display alternative content instead of Flash content
displayAltContent(obj);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var nn = n.nextSibling; nn; nn = nn.nextSibling) {
nodelist.push(nn);
xpathCollectDescendants(nodelist, nn);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (v1.type == 'string') {
var s = v1.stringValue();
var n = v2.nodeSetValue();
ret = false;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (ua.webkit && ua.webkit < 312) { // Older webkit engines ignore the object element's nested param elements
fixParams(obj);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!(c[i].nodeType == 1 && c[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() == "param") && !(c[i].nodeType == 8)) {
ac.appendChild(c[i].cloneNode(true));
}
Function contains
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Spry.Widget.Utils.contains = function (who, what)
{
if (typeof who.contains == 'object') {
return what && who && (who == what || who.contains(what));
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var n = input.nextSibling; n; n = n.nextSibling) {
nodelist.push(n);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (typeof par.flashvars != UNDEF) {
par.flashvars += "&" + i + "=" + flashvarsObj[i];
}
else {
par.flashvars = i + "=" + flashvarsObj[i];
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for(attr in arguments[1])
element[attr == 'class' ? 'className' : attr] = arguments[1][attr];
Function loop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
loop: function(timePos) {
if (timePos >= this.startOn) {
if (timePos >= this.finishOn) {
this.render(1.0);
this.cancel();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (stack[s].tag == pattern[p]) {
match.push(stack[s]);
ds += 1;
match.matchlength += 1;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (cmp(s, nn)) {
ret = true;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (stack[s].tag == pattern[p]) {
while (s - ds >= 0 && stack[s - ds].tag == pattern[p]) {
qmatch.push(stack[s - ds]);
ds += 1;
match.matchlength += 1;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (m.toLowerCase() == "styleclass") { // 'class' is an ECMA4 reserved keyword
o.setAttribute("class", attObj[m]);
}
else if (m != "classid") { // Filter out IE specific attribute
o.setAttribute(m, attObj[m]);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (testVal)
this.processTokenChildren(outputArr, token, processContext);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!lastStartComment)
node.insertBefore(oComment, node.firstChild);
else
node.insertBefore(oComment, lastStartComment.nextSibling);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (a_l_c > b_l_c)
return -1;
else if (a_l_c < b_l_c)
return 1;
else if (a_c > b_c)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (bAttrValue != undefined)
{
hasBehaviorAttributes = true;
if (bAttrs[behaviorAttrName].setup)
bAttrs[behaviorAttrName].setup(node, bAttrValue);