Sign upLogin

IBM-Swift/Kitura

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 850 of 850 total issues

Function patch has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func patch<T: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, I: Codable, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T, Id, I, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func delete<T1: TypeSafeMiddleware, T2: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T1, T2, Id, @escaping ResultClosure) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function put has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func put<T1: TypeSafeMiddleware, T2: TypeSafeMiddleware, T3: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, I: Codable, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T1, T2, T3, Id, I, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func get<T1: TypeSafeMiddleware, T2: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T1, T2, Id, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func get<T1: TypeSafeMiddleware, T2: TypeSafeMiddleware, T3: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T1, T2, T3, Id, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function put has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func put<T: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, I: Codable, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T, Id, I, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function next has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    func next() {
        middlewareIndex += 1

        if middlewareIndex < middlewares.count && (response.error == nil || method == .error) {
            do {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/RouterMiddlewareWalker.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function put has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public func put<T1: TypeSafeMiddleware, T2: TypeSafeMiddleware, Id: Identifier, I: Codable, O: Codable>(
        _ route: String,
        handler: @escaping (T1, T2, Id, I, @escaping CodableResultClosure<O>) -> Void
    ) {
        if !pathSyntaxIsValid(route, identifierExpected: true) {
Severity: Minor
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        func callbackText(request: RouterRequest, response: RouterResponse) {
            do {
                try response.status(HTTPStatusCode.OK).send("Hi from Kitura!").end()
            } catch {}
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1383..1388

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 55.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        func callbackHtml(request: RouterRequest, response: RouterResponse) {
            do {
                try response.status(HTTPStatusCode.OK).send("<!DOCTYPE html><html><body>Hi from Kitura!</body></html>\n\n").end()
            } catch {}
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1376..1381

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 55.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            do {
                do {
                    try response.send(jsonp: json).end()
                } catch JSONPError.invalidCallbackName {
                    try response.status(.badRequest).end()
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1455..1461

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            do {
                do {
                    try response.send(jsonp: json).end()
                } catch JSONPError.invalidCallbackName {
                    try response.status(.badRequest).end()
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1428..1434

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    static var allTests: [(String, (TestStack) -> () throws -> Void)] {
        return [
            ("testEmpty", testEmpty),
            ("testPushPop", testPushPop)
        ]
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestStack.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/MiscellaneousTests.swift on lines 25..30

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path: "/code_unknown_to_ok", callback: { response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
                expectation.fulfill()
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1135..1141

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path: "/code_notFound_no_change", callback: { response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .notFound, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
                expectation.fulfill()
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1128..1134

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    struct TestCodable: Codable {
        let name: String
        let value: Int
        let optionalCaption: String?
        let subCodable: TestSubCodable
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestDecodingErrorExtension.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestTemplateEngine.swift on lines 64..69

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    struct Person: Codable {
        let name: String
        let age: Int
        let email: String?
        let isMember: Bool
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestTemplateEngine.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestDecodingErrorExtension.swift on lines 148..153

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    static var allTests: [(String, (MiscellaneousTests) -> () throws -> Void)] {
        return [
            ("testHeaders", testHeaders),
            ("testHeadersHelpers", testHeadersHelpers)
        ]
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/MiscellaneousTests.swift and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestStack.swift on lines 23..28

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        router.delete("/fruit/:myid") { (id: Int, respondWith: (RequestError?) -> Void) in
            XCTFail("DELETE on /fruit/:myid that should not happen")
            respondWith(.badRequest)
        }
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestCodablePathParams.swift and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestCodablePathParams.swift on lines 144..147
Tests/KituraTests/TestCodableRouter.swift on lines 431..434

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        router.delete("/status/:") { (id: Int, respondWith: (RequestError?) -> Void) in
            XCTFail("DELETE on /status/: that should not happen")
            respondWith(.badRequest)
        }
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestCodablePathParams.swift and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestCodablePathParams.swift on lines 100..103
Tests/KituraTests/TestCodableRouter.swift on lines 431..434

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language