Showing 117 of 117 total issues
Function __process_line has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __process_line(line: str, output_file: TextIO, sentence_splitter: SentenceSplitter,
morph_predictor: RNNMorphPredictor):
sentences = sentence_splitter.split(line)
for sentence in sentences:
words = [token.text for token in Tokenizer.tokenize(sentence)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function write_markups has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_markups(destination_type: FileType, markups: List[Markup], path: str) -> None:
"""
Запись разметок в файл.
:param destination_type: тип файла.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, language: str="ru", mode: Mode=Mode.GRAPHEMES, raw_dict_path=None, trie_path=None,Function __init__ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self,Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
self.assertNotEqual(markup.lines[0].words[0].syllables[0].stress, -1)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
self.assertEqual(markup.lines[0].words[0].syllables[1].stress, -1)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ch == "'" or ch == "`":
if ch == "`":
secondary.append(pos)
else:
primary.append(pos)Function add_record has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_record(self, metre_name, line_num, strong_errors, weak_errors, pattern, failed=False):Function get_stress_predictor has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_stress_predictor(self, language="ru", stress_model_path: str=None, raw_stress_dict_path=None,Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if int(phoneme[-1]) == 2:
secondary.append(str(i+diphtongs_count))
phonemes[i] = phoneme[:-1]Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ch == "ё":
primary.append(pos)
if len(primary) != 0:Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if int(phoneme[-1]) == 1:
primary.append(str(i+diphtongs_count))
if int(phoneme[-1]) == 2:Function __call__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self, probabilities: np.array) -> np.array:
if self.rhyme_position < 0 and self.stress_position == len(self.metre_pattern) - 1:
probabilities = np.zeros(probabilities.shape, dtype="float")
probabilities[self.eos_index] = 1.
return probabilities- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if stress_count == 1 and other_syllable.stress == -1:
corrections.append(ac)
else:
resolutions.append(ac)
number_in_pattern += 1Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for item in j['items']:
yield Markup().from_dict(item)
elif source_type == FileType.RAW:Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if text != "":
yield Markup().from_raw(text)
else:Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if syllable.number == other_syllable.number or pattern[other_number_in_pattern].lower() != "s":
continue
ac = StressCorrection(line_number, w, other_syllable.number, word.text, other_syllable.vowel())Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, language="ru", stress_model_path: str=RU_STRESS_DEFAULT_MODEL, raw_stress_dict_path=None,Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for elem in Reader.__xml_iter(file, 'markup'):
yield Markup().from_xml(etree.tostring(elem, encoding='utf-8', method='xml'))
elif source_type == FileType.JSON:Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for line in file:
if line == "\n":
separator_count += 1
else:
text += line