Showing 542 of 542 total issues
Function __new__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __new__(metacls, name, bases, namespace):
"""
Args:
metacls (:obj:`Model`): :obj:`Model`, or a subclass of :obj:`Model`
name (:obj:`str`): :obj:`Model` class name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_xlsx_validation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_xlsx_validation(self, sheet_models=None, doc_metadata_model=None):
""" Get XLSX validation
Args:
sheet_models (:obj:`list` of :obj:`Model`, optional): models encoded as separate sheets
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_xlsx_validation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_xlsx_validation(self, sheet_models=None, doc_metadata_model=None):
""" Get XLSX validation
Args:
sheet_models (:obj:`list` of :obj:`Model`, optional): models encoded as separate sheets
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function diff_workbooks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff_workbooks(filename_1, filename_2, models, model_name, schema_name=None, **kwargs):
""" Get difference of models in two workbooks
Args:
filename_1 (:obj:`str`): path to first workbook
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Manager
has 23 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Manager(object):
""" Enable O(1) dictionary-based searching of a Model's instances
This class is inspired by Django's :obj:`Manager` class. An instance of :obj:`Manger` is associated with
each :obj:`Model` and accessed as the class attribute :obj:`objects` (as in Django).
Function validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(self, obj, value):
""" Determine if :obj:`value` is a valid value for this UnitAttribute
Args:
obj (:obj:`Model`): class being validated
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, model_cls, attr, expression, objs):
""" Create an instance of ParsedExpression
Args:
model_cls (:obj:`type`): the :obj:`Model` which has an expression
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(schema_changes_kwargs):
""" Check that the attributes of the arguments to :obj:`SchemaChanges` have the right structure
Args:
schema_changes_kwargs (:obj:`dict`): kwargs arguments to :obj:`SchemaChanges` generated by loading a schema
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, ontology, namespace=None, namespace_sep=':', terms=None, none=True,
default=None, default_cleaned_value=None, none_value=None,
verbose_name='', description='',
primary=False, unique=False, unique_case_insensitive=False):
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(self, obj, value):
""" Determine if :obj:`value` is a valid value for this QuantityAttribute
Args:
obj (:obj:`Model`): class being validated
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function is_equal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_equal(self, other, tol=0.):
if self.__class__ != other.__class__:
return False
min_eq = self.min.__class__ == other.min.__class__ and (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function copy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy(self):
""" Create a copy
Returns:
:obj:`Model`: model copy
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_attributes(metacls, name, bases, namespace):
""" Validate attribute values
Raises:
:obj:`ValueError`: if attributes are not valid
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function write_sheet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_sheet(self, writer, model, data, headings, metadata_headings, validation,
extra_entries=0, merge_ranges=None, protected=True):
""" Write data to sheet
Args:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
GitRepo
has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class GitRepo(object):
""" Methods for processing a git repo and its commit history
Attributes:
repo_dir (:obj:`str`): the repo's root directory
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
io.Writer().run(args.out_wb_file, objs,
schema_name=schema_name,
doc_metadata=reader._doc_metadata,
model_metadata=reader._model_metadata,
models=models, write_toc=args.write_toc, write_schema=args.write_schema,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
io.Writer().run(args.out_wb_file, objs,
schema_name=schema_name,
doc_metadata=reader._doc_metadata,
model_metadata=reader._model_metadata,
models=models, write_toc=args.write_toc, write_schema=args.write_schema,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function get_xlsx_validation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_xlsx_validation(self, sheet_models=None, doc_metadata_model=None):
""" Get XLSX validation
Args:
sheet_models (:obj:`list` of :obj:`Model`, optional): models encoded as separate sheets
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _is_equal_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _is_equal_attributes(self, other, tol=0.):
""" Determine if the attributes of two objects are semantically equal
Args:
other (:obj:`Model`): object to compare
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _generate_normalize_sort_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _generate_normalize_sort_keys(cls):
""" Generates keys for sorting the class """
generated_keys = []
keys_to_generate = [cls]
while keys_to_generate:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"