File MongoDBPredicateAdaptor.swift
has 389 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
#if canImport(MapKit)
import MapKit
#endif
Function transform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func transform(constant: Any?, modifyingOperator `operator`: inout MongoDBOperator) -> Any? {
if constant == nil || constant is NSNull {
return NSNull()
} else if constant is String {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function replacementPredicate
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forBetweenPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
let rightExpression = predicate.rightExpression
guard let bounds = rightExpression.constantValue as? [Any], bounds.count == 2 else {
return nil
Function transform
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func transform(constant: Any?, modifyingOperator `operator`: inout MongoDBOperator) -> Any? {
if constant == nil || constant is NSNull {
return NSNull()
} else if constant is String {
Function transform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func transform(comparisonPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> [String : Any]? {
var result: [String : Any]? = nil
if predicate.leftExpression.expressionType == .function ||
predicate.rightExpression.expressionType == .function
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ensureKeyPathExpressionsContainJSThis
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func ensureKeyPathExpressionsContainJSThis(inExpression expression: NSExpression) -> NSExpression {
switch expression.expressionType {
case .keyPath:
return NSExpression(forKeyPath: "this.\(expression.keyPath)")
case .function:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return nil
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return transform(geoShape: shape)
Function replacementPredicate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forComparisonPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
switch predicate.predicateOperatorType {
case .between:
return replacementPredicate(forBetweenPredicate: predicate)
case .beginsWith:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forEndsWithPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
if let constantValue = predicate.rightExpression.constantValue {
let endsWithRegex = ".*\(constantValue)"
return replacementPredicate(
forComparisonPredicate: predicate,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forContainsPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
if let constantValue = predicate.rightExpression.constantValue {
let containsRegex = ".*\(constantValue).*"
return replacementPredicate(
forComparisonPredicate: predicate,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forLikePredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
if let constantValue = predicate.rightExpression.constantValue {
let likeRegex = "/(\(constantValue))/"
return replacementPredicate(
forComparisonPredicate: predicate,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private func replacementPredicate(forBeginsWithPredicate predicate: NSComparisonPredicate) -> NSPredicate? {
if let constantValue = predicate.rightExpression.constantValue {
let beginsWithRegex = "^\(constantValue)"
return replacementPredicate(
forComparisonPredicate: predicate,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76