Showing 2,011 of 2,013 total issues
File User.swift
has 1568 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import PromiseKit
#if os(iOS) || os(OSX)
import SafariServices
File FileStore.swift
has 1185 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import PromiseKit
#if os(macOS)
import AppKit
File DataStore.swift
has 1174 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import PromiseKit
/// Class to interact with a specific collection in the backend.
open class DataStore<T: Persistable> where T: NSObject {
Function execute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 147 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func execute(completionHandler: CompletionHandler?) -> AnyRequest<ResultType> {
var count = UInt(0)
var errors: [Swift.Error] = []
let collectionName = try! T.collectionName()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Query.swift
has 948 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
#if !os(watchOS)
import MapKit
#endif
File HttpRequestFactory.swift
has 854 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
struct HttpRequestFactory: RequestFactory {
let client: Client
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@discardableResult
open func group<Avg: AddableType>(
keys: [String],
avg: String,
avgType: Avg.Type? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 683.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@discardableResult
open func group<Sum: AddableType>(
keys: [String],
sum: String,
sumType: Sum.Type? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 683.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@discardableResult
open func group<Min: MinMaxType>(
keys: [String],
min: String,
minType: Min.Type? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 683.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@discardableResult
open func group<Max: MinMaxType>(
keys: [String],
max: String,
maxType: Max.Type? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 683.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function presentMICViewController
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
open class func presentMICViewController<U: User>(
redirectURI: URL,
micUserInterface: MICUserInterface = MICUserInterface.default,
currentViewController: UIViewController? = nil,
options: Options? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File MIC.swift
has 528 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import PromiseKit
class URLSessionDelegateAdapter : NSObject, URLSessionTaskDelegate {
Function createBucket
has a Cognitive Complexity of 52 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fileprivate func createBucket<ResultType>(
_ file: FileType,
fromSource source: InputSource,
options: Options?,
requests: MultiRequest<ResultType>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File HttpRequest.swift
has 496 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
#if os(iOS) || os(tvOS)
import UIKit
#elseif os(watchOS)
User
has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
open class User: NSObject, Credential {
/// Username Key.
@available(*, deprecated, message: "Deprecated in version 3.17.0. Please use User.CodingKeys.username instead")
public static let PersistableUsernameKey = "username"
Function translate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
internal func translate(expression: NSExpression, otherSideExpression: NSExpression) -> NSExpression {
switch expression.expressionType {
case .keyPath:
var keyPath = expression.keyPath
var type: AnyClass? = self.persistableType as? AnyClass
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
DataStore
has 44 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
open class DataStore<T: Persistable> where T: NSObject {
@available(*, deprecated, message: "Deprecated in version 3.17.0. Please use Result<AnyRandomAccessCollection<T>, Swift.Error> instead")
public typealias ArrayCompletionHandler = ([T]?, Swift.Error?) -> Void
FileStore
has 44 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
open class FileStore<FileType: File> {
@available(*, deprecated, message: "Deprecated in version 3.17.0. Please use Result<FileType, Swift.Error> instead")
public typealias FileCompletionHandler = (FileType?, Swift.Error?) -> Void
Function execute
has 146 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func execute(completionHandler: CompletionHandler?) -> AnyRequest<ResultType> {
var count = UInt(0)
var errors: [Swift.Error] = []
let collectionName = try! T.collectionName()
File FindOperation.swift
has 403 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import PromiseKit
private let MaxIdsPerQuery = 200
private let MaxSizePerResultSet = 10_000