Method wordAnalysis
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<ExpressionWord> wordAnalysis(String expressionStr) {
String expStrNoSpace = remove(expressionStr, ' '); //去除目标表达式中的空格字符
char[] exChar = expStrNoSpace.toCharArray();
List<ExpressionWord> expressionWord = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < exChar.length; i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method wordAnalysis
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<ExpressionWord> wordAnalysis(String expressionStr) {
String expStrNoSpace = remove(expressionStr, ' '); //去除目标表达式中的空格字符
char[] exChar = expStrNoSpace.toCharArray();
List<ExpressionWord> expressionWord = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < exChar.length; i++) {
File Expression.java
has 350 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package com.github.kuangcp.parser.expression;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
Method getPostfix
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<ExpressionWord> getPostfix(Expression expression) {
List<ExpressionWord> midfix = expression.getWord(); //获取中缀表达式的经过词法分析器分析的结果集
List<ExpressionWord> result = new ArrayList<>(); //存储后缀表达式结果的List集合
Stack<ExpressionWord> operationStack = new Stack<>(); //操作符栈
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Expression
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class Expression {
private String expression; //算术表达式字符串
private final List<ExpressionWord> expressionWord; //存储表达式词法分析所得的单词与该单词所对应的种别编码的集合
private int index; //读取词法分析器的字符游标
Method expCalculate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static BigDecimal expCalculate(Expression expression) {
List<ExpressionWord> postfix = getPostfix(expression); //获取表达式的后缀表达式
Stack<BigDecimal> result = new Stack<>(); //操作数栈
if (postfix != null && postfix.size() > 0) {
for (int i = 0; i < postfix.size(); i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getPostfix
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<ExpressionWord> getPostfix(Expression expression) {
List<ExpressionWord> midfix = expression.getWord(); //获取中缀表达式的经过词法分析器分析的结果集
List<ExpressionWord> result = new ArrayList<>(); //存储后缀表达式结果的List集合
Stack<ExpressionWord> operationStack = new Stack<>(); //操作符栈
Method expCalculate
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static BigDecimal expCalculate(Expression expression) {
List<ExpressionWord> postfix = getPostfix(expression); //获取表达式的后缀表达式
Stack<BigDecimal> result = new Stack<>(); //操作数栈
if (postfix != null && postfix.size() > 0) {
for (int i = 0; i < postfix.size(); i++) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (('a' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'z') || ('A' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'Z') || exChar[i] == '_' || ('0' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= '9')) {
sb.append('.');
i = getI(exChar, i, sb);
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("词法错误!");
Method getI
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static int getI(char[] exChar, int i, StringBuilder sb) {
while (('a' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'z') || ('A' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'Z') || exChar[i] == '_' || ('0' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= '9')) {
if (i == exChar.length - 1) {
sb.append(exChar[i]);
break;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (exChar[i] == '+' || exChar[i] == '-' || exChar[i] == '*' || exChar[i] == '/' || exChar[i] == '(' || exChar[i] == ')') {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append(exChar[i]);
switch (exChar[i]) {
case '+':
Method E1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void E1() {
if (sym == 1) {
next();
T();
E1();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method F
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void F() {
if (sym == 5) {
next();
} else if (sym == 6) {
next();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method T1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void T1() {
if (sym == 3) {
next();
F();
T1();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (i == exChar.length - 1) {
switch (exChar[i]) {
case '+':
expressionWord.add(new ExpressionWord("+", 1));
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 146.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (i == exChar.length - 1) {
switch (exChar[i]) {
case '+':
expressionWord.add(new ExpressionWord("+", 1));
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 146.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (('a' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'z') || ('A' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'Z') || exChar[i] == '_' || ('0' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= '9')) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (('a' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'z') || ('A' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= 'Z') || exChar[i] == '_' || ('0' <= exChar[i] && exChar[i] <= '9')) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (b && exChar[i] <= '9') {
if (i == exChar.length - 1) {
sb.append(exChar[i]);
break;
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76