Sign upLogin

LiberTEM/LiberTEM

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 916 of 916 total issues

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function set_worker_log_level. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@contextlib.contextmanager
def set_worker_log_level(level: Union[str, int], force: bool = False):
    """
    Set the dask.distributed log level for any processes spawned
    within the context manager. If force is False, don't overwrite
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/dask.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _compute. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def _compute(self, *args, udfs=None, user_backends=None, traverse=True, **kwargs):
        """
        Acts as dask.compute(*args, **kwargs) but with knowledge
        of Libertem data structures and compute resources
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/delayed.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function build_mapping. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def build_mapping(el: Any,
                  unpackable_types: dict[type, Callable[[Iterable],
                                                        Iterable[tuple[Any, Any]]]] = None,
                  ignore_types: Optional[tuple[type, ...]] = None,
                  _pos: list[tuple[type, Any]] = None) -> list[list[tuple[type, Any]]]:
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/utils/delayed_unpack.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function main. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def main():
    BASE_DIR = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__))

    with open(os.path.join(BASE_DIR, "../.mypy-checked")) as f:
        files_project = set(f.read().split())
Severity: Minor
Found in scripts/run_mypy.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method create_com_analysis. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def create_com_analysis(self, dataset: DataSet, cx: int = None, cy: int = None,
                            mask_radius: float = None, flip_y: bool = False,
                            mask_radius_inner: float = None,
                            scan_rotation: float = 0.0) -> COMAnalysis:
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/api.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method close. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def close(self):
        with tracer.start_as_current_span("PipelinedExecutor.close") as span:
            if self._closed:
                return
            for idx, worker_info in enumerate(self._pool.workers):
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/pipelined.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function decode_r1_swap_2x2. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@numba.njit(inline='always', cache=True, boundscheck=True)
def decode_r1_swap_2x2(inp, out, idx, native_dtype, rr, origin, shape, ds_shape):
    """
    RAW 1bit format: each pixel is actually saved as a single bit. 64 bits
    need to be unpacked together. This is the quad variant.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/mib.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method flatten_nav. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def flatten_nav(self, containing_shape: ShapeLike) -> "Slice":
        sig_dims = self.shape.sig.dims
        nav_dims = self.shape.dims - sig_dims
        containing_shape = tuple(containing_shape)[:nav_dims]
        origin = self.origin[:nav_dims]
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/common/slice.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function run. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def run(
    host, port, browser, local_directory, numeric_level,
    token, preload, strict_port, executor_spec, open_ds,
    snooze_timeout: Optional[float] = None,
):
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/web/server.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function cbed_frame. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def cbed_frame(
        fy=128, fx=128, zero=None, a=None, b=None, indices=None,
        radius=4, all_equal=False, margin=None):
    if zero is None:
        zero = (fy//2, fx//2)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function set_torch_threads. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@contextmanager
def set_torch_threads(n):
    global __has_pytorch
    global __pytorch_counter
    global __pytorch_threads
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/common/threading.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function correct. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def correct(
        buffer, dark_image=None, gain_map=None, excluded_pixels=None, repair_descriptor=None,
        inplace=False, sig_shape=None, allow_empty=False):
    '''
    Function to perform detector corrections
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/corrections/detector.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method calc_coords. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def calc_coords(self, indices=None, drop_zero=False, frame_shape=None, r=0):
        '''
        Shorthand to calculate peak coordinates.

        Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/analysis/gridmatching.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function insert_at_pos. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def insert_at_pos(el: Any,
                  coords: list[tuple[type, Any]],
                  nest: Iterable,
                  merge_fns: dict[type, Callable[[Iterable, Any, Any], None]]):
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/utils/delayed_unpack.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _get_scale_factors. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def _get_scale_factors(self, shape, containing_shape, size, min_factors=None):
        """
        Generate scaling factors to scale `shape` up to `size` elements,
        while being constrained to `containing_shape`.
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/base/tiling_scheme.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_tiles. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def get_tiles(self, *args, **kwargs):
        if args and isinstance(args[0], TilingScheme):
            tiling_scheme = args[0]
            args = args[1:]
            intent = tiling_scheme.intent
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/memory.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (8)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def __init__(
        self,
        path: str,
        sig_dims: Optional[int] = 2,
        nav_shape: Optional[tuple[int, int]] = None,
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/npy.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    try {
        yield call(getConfigSaga);
    } catch (e) {
        const timestamp = Date.now();
        const id = uuid();
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/config/sagas.ts and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts on lines 31..60
client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts on lines 162..194

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 77.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

        try {
            const action = (yield take(runOrParamsChannel)) as compoundAnalysisActions.ActionParts["run"];

            // ignore actions meant for other analyses
            if (action.payload.id !== compoundAnalysisId) {
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts on lines 31..60
client/src/config/sagas.ts on lines 56..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 77.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    try {
        const datasetState = (yield select(selectDataset, action.payload.dataset)) as DatasetState;
        if (datasetState.status !== DatasetStatus.OPEN) {
            throw new Error("invalid dataset status");
        }
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/sagas.ts on lines 162..194
client/src/config/sagas.ts on lines 56..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 77.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function environments has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def environments(excluded_pixels, sigshape):
    '''
    Calculate a hypercube surface around a pixel, excluding frame boundaries

    Returns
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/corrections/detector.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function xml_defect_coord_extractor has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def xml_defect_coord_extractor(bad_pixel_map, map_index, map_sizes):
    """
    returns the chosen bad pixel map's defects

    Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/seq.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function correct_dot_masks has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def correct_dot_masks(masks, gain_map, excluded_pixels=None, allow_empty=False):
    mask_shape = masks.shape
    sig_shape = gain_map.shape
    masks = masks.reshape((-1, prod(sig_shape)))
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/corrections/detector.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function insert_at_pos has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def insert_at_pos(el: Any,
                  coords: list[tuple[type, Any]],
                  nest: Iterable,
                  merge_fns: dict[type, Callable[[Iterable, Any, Any], None]]):
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/utils/delayed_unpack.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _do_match has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def _do_match(self, point_selection: grm.PointSelection, zero, polar_vectors):
        '''
        Return a list with matches of all pairwise combinations of polar_vectors
        '''
        match_list = []
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/analysis/fullmatch.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@numba.njit(inline='always', cache=True)
def decode_swap_only_4(inp, out, idx, native_dtype, rr, origin, shape, ds_shape):
    byteswap_4_straight(inp, out=out[idx].view(np.uint8))
Severity: Major
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 88..90
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 98..100

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@numba.njit(inline='always', cache=True)
def decode_swap_only_2(inp, out, idx, native_dtype, rr, origin, shape, ds_shape):
    byteswap_2_straight(inp, out=out[idx].view(np.uint8))
Severity: Major
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 93..95
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 98..100

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@numba.njit(inline='always', cache=True)
def decode_swap_only_8(inp, out, idx, native_dtype, rr, origin, shape, ds_shape):
    byteswap_8_straight(inp, out=out[idx].view(np.uint8))
Severity: Major
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 88..90
src/libertem/io/dataset/base/decode.py on lines 93..95

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="legal" />
                <List.Content>
                    LiberTEM is licensed under the <a href="https://github.com/LiberTEM/LiberTEM/blob/master/LICENSE">GNU General Public License v3.0</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 16..21
client/src/About.tsx on lines 22..27
client/src/About.tsx on lines 34..39
client/src/About.tsx on lines 40..45
client/src/About.tsx on lines 46..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="github" />
                <List.Content>
                    Find us on <a href="https://github.com/LiberTEM/LiberTEM">GitHub</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 22..27
client/src/About.tsx on lines 28..33
client/src/About.tsx on lines 34..39
client/src/About.tsx on lines 40..45
client/src/About.tsx on lines 46..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="bug" />
                <List.Content>
                    Found a bug? Got a feature request? Please <a href="https://github.com/LiberTEM/LiberTEM/issues/new">open an issue!</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 16..21
client/src/About.tsx on lines 28..33
client/src/About.tsx on lines 34..39
client/src/About.tsx on lines 40..45
client/src/About.tsx on lines 46..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="book" />
                <List.Content>
                    Read <a href="https://libertem.github.io/LiberTEM/">the documentation</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 16..21
client/src/About.tsx on lines 22..27
client/src/About.tsx on lines 28..33
client/src/About.tsx on lines 40..45
client/src/About.tsx on lines 46..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="user" />
                <List.Content>
                    Read <a href="https://libertem.github.io/LiberTEM/acknowledgments.html">the acknowledgments</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 16..21
client/src/About.tsx on lines 22..27
client/src/About.tsx on lines 28..33
client/src/About.tsx on lines 34..39
client/src/About.tsx on lines 46..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

            <List.Item>
                <List.Icon name="gitter" />
                <List.Content>
                    Join our <a href="https://gitter.im/LiberTEM/Lobby">chat on gitter!</a>
                </List.Content>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/About.tsx and 5 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/About.tsx on lines 16..21
client/src/About.tsx on lines 22..27
client/src/About.tsx on lines 28..33
client/src/About.tsx on lines 34..39
client/src/About.tsx on lines 40..45

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 76.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

                    <Form.Field>
                        <label> Number of clusters  <input type="number" value={nClust} step="1" min="2" max="100" onChange={clustChange} /> </label>
                    </Form.Field>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 151..154
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 155..157

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

export enum DatasetTypes {
    HDF5 = "HDF5",
    RAW = "RAW",
    MIB = "MIB",
    BLO = "BLO",
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/messages.ts and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/messages.ts on lines 512..527

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

                    <Form.Field>
                        <label>  Maximal number of possible peak positions to detect (better put higher value,
        the output is limited to the number of peaks the algorithm could find)  <input type="number" value={nPeaks} step="1" min="5" max="200" onChange={peakChange} /> </label>
                    </Form.Field>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 148..150
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 155..157

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

                    <Form.Field>
                        <label>  Minimal distance in pixels between peaks  <input type="number" value={minDist} step="1" min="0" max="100" onChange={minDistChange} />  </label>
                    </Form.Field>
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 148..150
client/src/compoundAnalysis/components/Clustering.tsx on lines 151..154

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

export enum AnalysisTypes {
    APPLY_RING_MASK = "APPLY_RING_MASK",
    APPLY_DISK_MASK = "APPLY_DISK_MASK",
    APPLY_POINT_SELECTOR = "APPLY_POINT_SELECTOR",
    CENTER_OF_MASS = "CENTER_OF_MASS",
Severity: Major
Found in client/src/messages.ts and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
client/src/messages.ts on lines 120..135

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method detect_params. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    @classmethod
    def detect_params(cls, path: str, executor: "JobExecutor"):
        try:
            _, extension = os.path.splitext(path)
            has_extension = extension.lstrip('.') in cls.get_supported_extensions()
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/raw_csr.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_dask_integration_executor. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def get_dask_integration_executor():
    '''
    Query the current Dask scheduler and return a :class:`~libertem.common.executor.JobExecutor`
    that is compatible with it. See https://docs.dask.org/en/stable/scheduling.html
    for the meaning of the different scheduler types.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/integration.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function _mib_2x2_tile_block. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

@numba.njit(inline="always", cache=True)
def _mib_2x2_tile_block(
    slices_arr, fileset_arr, slice_sig_sizes, sig_origins,
    inner_indices_start, inner_indices_stop, frame_indices, sig_size,
    px_to_bytes, bpp, frame_header_bytes, frame_footer_bytes, file_idxs,
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/mib.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def get(
        self,
        arr: Optional[np.ndarray] = None,
        sig_only: bool = False,
        nav_only: bool = False
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/common/slice.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def __init__(
        self,
        tasks: Iterable['UDFTask'],
        progress_id: str,
        reporter: Optional[ProgressReporter] = None,
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/common/progress.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function flatten_nested. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def flatten_nested(el: Any,
                   unpackable_types: dict[type, Callable[[Iterable],
                                                         Iterable[tuple[Any, Any]]]] = None,
                   ignore_types: Optional[tuple[type, ...]] = None) -> list[Any]:
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/executor/utils/delayed_unpack.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function xml_generate_map_size. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def xml_generate_map_size(exc_rows, exc_cols, exc_pix, size, metadata):
    """
    This function will be responsible for generating new size based on the parameters.
    returns an np array with the excluded pixels as True
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/seq.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _do_match. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def _do_match(self, point_selection: grm.PointSelection, zero, polar_vectors):
        '''
        Return a list with matches of all pairwise combinations of polar_vectors
        '''
        match_list = []
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/analysis/fullmatch.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _do_initialize. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

    def _do_initialize(self):
        self._filesize = os.stat(self._path).st_size
        reader = SERFile(path=self._path, num_frames=None)

        with reader.get_handle() as f1:
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/ser.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function merge_until_target. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def merge_until_target(array, target, min_chunks=0):
    chunking = array.chunks
    if array.nbytes < target:
        # A really small dataset, better to treat as one partition
        chunking = tuple((s,) for s in array.shape)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/io/dataset/dask.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function _get_norm. (7)
Open
  • Open
  • Confirmed
  • Invalid
  • Wontfix
Cancel 

def _get_norm(result, norm_cls=colors.Normalize, vmin=None, vmax=None, damage=None):
    if (vmin is not None) and (vmax is not None):
        return norm_cls(vmin=vmin, vmax=vmax)

    result = result.astype(np.float32)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/viz/base.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Severity
Category