LiberTEM/LiberTEM

View on GitHub
src/libertem/utils/generate.py

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function exclude_pixels. (9)
Open

def exclude_pixels(sig_dims, num_excluded):
    '''
    Generate a list of excluded pixels that
    can be reconstructed faithfully from their neighbors
    in a linear gradient dataset
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function cbed_frame. (8)
Open

def cbed_frame(
        fy=128, fx=128, zero=None, a=None, b=None, indices=None,
        radius=4, all_equal=False, margin=None):
    if zero is None:
        zero = (fy//2, fx//2)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function hologram_frame. (6)
Open

def hologram_frame(amp, phi,
                   counts=1000.,
                   sampling=5.,
                   visibility=1.,
                   f_angle=30.,
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function cbed_frame has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def cbed_frame(
        fy=128, fx=128, zero=None, a=None, b=None, indices=None,
        radius=4, all_equal=False, margin=None):
    if zero is None:
        zero = (fy//2, fx//2)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function cbed_frame has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def cbed_frame(
Severity: Major
Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Function hologram_frame has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def hologram_frame(amp, phi,
                       counts=1000.,
                       sampling=5.,
                       visibility=1.,
                       f_angle=30.,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function exclude_pixels has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def exclude_pixels(sig_dims, num_excluded):
        '''
        Generate a list of excluded pixels that
        can be reconstructed faithfully from their neighbors
        in a linear gradient dataset
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function "hologram_frame" has 8 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized.
    Open

    def hologram_frame(amp, phi,
                       counts=1000.,
                       sampling=5.,
                       visibility=1.,
                       f_angle=30.,
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by sonar-python

    A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

    def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
        ...
    

    Compliant Solution

    def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
        ...
    

    Function "cbed_frame" has 9 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized.
    Wontfix

            fy=128, fx=128, zero=None, a=None, b=None, indices=None,
            radius=4, all_equal=False, margin=None):
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py by sonar-python

    A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

    def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
        ...
    

    Compliant Solution

    def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
        ...
    

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                             * np.cos(2. * np.pi * y / sampling * np.cos(f_angle)
                                      + 2. * np.pi * x / sampling * np.sin(f_angle)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/libertem/utils/generate.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    src/libertem/utils/generate.py on lines 103..103

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 33.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status