ManageIQ/inventory_refresh

View on GitHub
lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_collection/index/proxy.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage
A
97%

Method assert_index has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def assert_index(manager_uuid, ref)
          # TODO(lsmola) do we need some production logging too? Maybe the refresh log level could drive this
          # Let' do this really slick development and test env, but disable for production, since the checks are pretty
          # slow.
          return unless inventory_collection.assert_graph_integrity
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_collection/index/proxy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method lazy_find has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def lazy_find(manager_uuid = nil, opts = {}, ref: primary_index_ref, key: nil, default: nil, transform_nested_lazy_finds: false, **manager_uuid_hash)
          # TODO(lsmola) also, it should be enough to have only 1 find method, everything can be lazy, until we try to
          # access the data

          ref                         = opts[:ref] if opts.key?(:ref)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_collection/index/proxy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method assert_relation_keys has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def assert_relation_keys(data, ref)
          named_ref(ref).each do |key|
            # Skip if the key is not a foreign key
            next unless association_to_foreign_key_mapping[key]
            # Skip if data on key are nil or InventoryObject or InventoryObjectLazy
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_collection/index/proxy.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [7/5]
Open

        def lazy_find(manager_uuid = nil, opts = {}, ref: primary_index_ref, key: nil, default: nil, transform_nested_lazy_finds: false, **manager_uuid_hash)

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status