ManageIQ/inventory_refresh

View on GitHub
lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_object_lazy.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage
A
96%

Method transform_nested_secondary_indexes! has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def transform_nested_secondary_indexes!(depth = 0)
      raise "Nested references are too deep!" if depth > 20

      keys.each do |x|
        attr = full_reference[x]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_object_lazy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method skeletal_precreate! has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def skeletal_precreate!
      # We can do skeletal pre-create only for strategies using unique indexes. Since this can build records out of
      # the given :arel scope, we will always attempt to create the recod, so we need unique index to avoid duplication
      # of records.
      return unless parallel_safe?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_object_lazy.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

      return if keys.any? { |x| full_reference[x].blank? }
Severity: Major
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_object_lazy.rb - About 30 mins to fix

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [6/5]
Open

    def initialize(inventory_collection, index_data, ref: :manager_ref, key: nil, default: nil, transform_nested_lazy_finds: false)

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method load_object_with_key has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def load_object_with_key(loaded_object)
      # TODO(lsmola) Log error if we are accessing path that is present in blacklist or not present in whitelist
      if loaded_object.present?
        if loaded_object.try(:data).present?
          loaded_object.data[key] || default
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/inventory_refresh/inventory_object_lazy.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status