Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 18,382 of 18,382 total issues

Method ab_get_node_info has a Cognitive Complexity of 71 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def ab_get_node_info(node)
    @nodetype = node.split("_")
    nodeid = node.split("-")

    # initializing variables to hold data for selected node
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/miq_ae_customization_controller/custom_buttons.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  if (buttonTitle === __('Maximize')) {
    document.getElementById(`dd_w${widgetId}_box`).style.display = 'block';
    menuItems.forEach((button) => {
      if (button.props.title === __('Maximize')) {
        const newButton = (
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/components/dashboard-widgets/widget-wrapper/helper.jsx and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/components/dashboard-widgets/widget-wrapper/helper.jsx on lines 88..115

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 259.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  if (buttonTitle === __('Minimize')) {
    document.getElementById(`dd_w${widgetId}_box`).style.display = 'none';
    menuItems.forEach((button) => {
      if (button.props.title === __('Minimize')) {
        const newButton = (
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/components/dashboard-widgets/widget-wrapper/helper.jsx and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/components/dashboard-widgets/widget-wrapper/helper.jsx on lines 117..144

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 259.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (direction === 'DESC') {
          temp.sort((x, y) => {
            if (x.severity.text.toLowerCase() < y.severity.text.toLowerCase()) { return -1; }
            if (x.severity.text.toLowerCase() > y.severity.text.toLowerCase()) { return 1; }
            return 0;
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/components/data-tables/requests-table/index.jsx and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/components/data-tables/requests-table/index.jsx on lines 58..72

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 259.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (direction === 'DESC') {
          temp.sort((x, y) => {
            if (x.message.text.toLowerCase() < y.message.text.toLowerCase()) { return -1; }
            if (x.message.text.toLowerCase() > y.message.text.toLowerCase()) { return 1; }
            return 0;
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/components/data-tables/requests-table/index.jsx and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/components/data-tables/requests-table/index.jsx on lines 36..50

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 259.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File ci_processing.rb has 775 lines of code (exceeds 400 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module ApplicationController::CiProcessing
  extend ActiveSupport::Concern

  included do
    include Mixins::Actions::VmActions::Ownership
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/application_controller/ci_processing.rb - About 1 day to fix

Function MiqTableCell has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

const MiqTableCell = ({
  cell, onCellClick, row, truncate,
}) => {
  const [confirm, setConfirm] = useState(false);
Severity: Minor
Found in app/javascript/components/miq-data-table/miq-table-cell.jsx - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method data_for_breadcrumbs has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def data_for_breadcrumbs(controller_options = {})
      options = breadcrumbs_options || {}
      options[:record_info] ||= (@record || {})
      options[:record_title] ||= :name
      options[:not_tree] ||= false
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/mixins/breadcrumbs_mixin.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method button has 270 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def button
      @edit = session[:edit] # Restore @edit for adv search box

      params[:display] = @display if ["vms", "hosts", 'host_aggregates', "storages", "instances", "images", "orchestration_stacks"].include?(@display) # Were we displaying vms/hosts/storages
      params[:page] = @current_page unless @current_page.nil? # Save current page for list refresh
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/mixins/ems_common.rb - About 1 day to fix

Function aeMethodFormController has 268 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function aeMethodFormController($http, $scope, aeMethodFormId, currentRegion, miqService, playbookReusableCodeMixin, location, API) {
  var vm = this;
  var init = function() {
    vm.aeMethodModel = {
      name: '',
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/angular/miq_ae_class/ae_method_form_controller.js - About 1 day to fix

Cyclomatic complexity for replace_right_cell is too high. [86/11]
Open

  def replace_right_cell(options = {})
    @explorer = true
    action = options[:action]
    replace_trees = options[:replace_trees] || []
    get_node_info unless @in_a_form
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/report_controller.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

const tags = [
  { description: 'Name', id: 1, values: [{ description: 'Pepa', id: 11 }, { description: 'Franta', id: 12 }] },
  { description: 'Number', id: 2, values: [{ description: '1', id: 21 }, { description: '2', id: 22 }] },
  { description: 'Animal', id: 3, values: [{ description: 'Duck', id: 31 }, { description: 'Cat', id: 32 }, { description: 'Dog', id: 33 }] },
  { description: 'Food', id: 4, values: [{ description: 'Steak', id: 41 }, { description: 'Duck', id: 42 }, { description: 'Salad', id: 43 }] },
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/tagging/tests/tagging.with.reducer.test.js and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/tagging/tests/tagging.with.buttons.test.js on lines 9..20

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 242.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

const tags = [
  { description: 'Name', id: 1, values: [{ description: 'Pepa', id: 11 }, { description: 'Franta', id: 12 }] },
  { description: 'Number', id: 2, values: [{ description: '1', id: 21 }, { description: '2', id: 22 }] },
  { description: 'Animal', id: 3, values: [{ description: 'Duck', id: 31 }, { description: 'Cat', id: 32 }, { description: 'Dog', id: 33 }] },
  { description: 'Food', id: 4, values: [{ description: 'Steak', id: 41 }, { description: 'Duck', id: 42 }, { description: 'Salad', id: 43 }] },
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/tagging/tests/tagging.with.buttons.test.js and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
app/javascript/tagging/tests/tagging.with.reducer.test.js on lines 9..20

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 242.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method set_form_locals has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_form_locals
    locals = {}
    if x_active_tree == :diagnostics_tree
      if @sb[:active_tab] == "diagnostics_cu_repair"
        action_url = "cu_repair"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/ops_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method valid_report? has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def valid_report?(rpt)
    active_tab = 'edit_1'
    if @edit[:new][:model] == ApplicationController::TREND_MODEL
      unless @edit[:new][:perf_trend_col]
        add_flash(_('Trending for is required'), :error)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/report_controller/reports/editor.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method alert_field_changed has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def alert_field_changed
    return unless load_edit("miq_alert_edit__#{params[:id]}")

    @alert = @edit[:alert_id] ? MiqAlert.find(@edit[:alert_id]) : MiqAlert.new
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/miq_alert_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method widget_set_form_vars has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def widget_set_form_vars
    @timezone_abbr = get_timezone_abbr
    @edit = {}
    @edit[:widget_id] = @widget.id
    @edit[:read_only] = !!@widget.read_only
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/report_controller/widgets.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File ops_controller.rb has 743 lines of code (exceeds 400 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class OpsController < ApplicationController
  # Methods for accordions
  include Diagnostics
  include OpsRbac
  include Settings
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/ops_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

Method gfv_sort has a Cognitive Complexity of 64 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def gfv_sort
    @edit[:new][:order] = params[:sort_order] if params[:sort_order]
    if params[:sort_group] # If grouping changed,
      @edit[:new][:group] = params[:sort_group]
      @refresh_div = "sort_div" # Resend the sort tab
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/report_controller/reports/editor.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function playbookReusableCodeMixin has 252 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function playbookReusableCodeMixin(API, $q, miqService) {
  var sortOptions = '&sort_by=name&sort_order=ascending';
  var allApiPromises = [];

  var getSortedHash = function(inputHash) {
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/oldjs/controllers/playbook-reusable-code-mixin.js - About 1 day to fix
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language