Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Cyclomatic complexity for action_snmp_trap is too high. [20/11]
Open

  def action_snmp_trap(action, rec, inputs)
    # Validate SNMP Version
    snmp_version = action.options[:snmp_version]
    snmp_version = 2 if action.options[:snmp_version] == "v2"
    snmp_version = 1 if action.options[:snmp_version] == "v1"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_action.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for perf_capture is too high. [20/11]
Open

  def perf_capture(interval_name, *_args)
    unless Metric::Capture::VALID_CAPTURE_INTERVALS.include?(interval_name)
      raise ArgumentError, _("invalid interval_name '%{name}'") % {:name => interval_name}
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/storage.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for monitor_servers_as_non_master is too high. [20/11]
Open

  def monitor_servers_as_non_master
    @last_servers  = {}
    @last_master ||= {}
    rec = @last_master[:record]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/server_monitor.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for run is too high. [20/11]
Open

      def run(options = {})
        return if available_columns.empty?

        puts "fixing #{table_name}.#{available_columns.join(", ")}" unless options[:silent]
        processed = 0
Severity: Minor
Found in tools/fix_auth/auth_model.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for operands2humanvalue is too high. [20/11]
Open

  def self.operands2humanvalue(ops, options = {})
    # puts "Enter: operands2humanvalue: ops: #{ops.inspect}"
    ret = []
    if ops["tag"]
      v = nil
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def configure_service_worker_deployment(definition)
    super

    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:containers].first[:volumeMounts] << {:name => "remote-console-httpd-config", :mountPath => "/etc/httpd/conf.d"}
    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:volumes] << {:name => "remote-console-httpd-config", :configMap => {:name => "remote-console-httpd-configs", :defaultMode => 420}}
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/miq_remote_console_worker.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/models/miq_ui_worker.rb on lines 48..56
app/models/miq_web_service_worker.rb on lines 33..41

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 97.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def configure_service_worker_deployment(definition)
    super

    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:containers].first[:volumeMounts] << {:name => "ui-httpd-configs", :mountPath => "/etc/httpd/conf.d"}
    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:volumes] << {:name => "ui-httpd-configs", :configMap => {:name => "ui-httpd-configs", :defaultMode => 420}}
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/miq_ui_worker.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/models/miq_remote_console_worker.rb on lines 22..30
app/models/miq_web_service_worker.rb on lines 33..41

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 97.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def configure_service_worker_deployment(definition)
    super

    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:containers].first[:volumeMounts] << {:name => "api-httpd-config", :mountPath => "/etc/httpd/conf.d"}
    definition[:spec][:template][:spec][:volumes] << {:name => "api-httpd-config", :configMap => {:name => "api-httpd-configs", :defaultMode => 420}}
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/miq_web_service_worker.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
app/models/miq_remote_console_worker.rb on lines 22..30
app/models/miq_ui_worker.rb on lines 48..56

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 97.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity for build_table is too high. [19/11]
Open

  def build_table(data, _db, options = {})
    data = data.to_a
    objs = data[0] && data[0].kind_of?(Integer) ? db_class.where(:id => data) : data.compact

    remove_loading_relations_for_virtual_custom_attributes
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for build_correlate_tag_cols is too high. [19/11]
Open

  def build_correlate_tag_cols
    tags2desc = {}
    arr = self.cols.each_with_object([]) do |c, a|
      self.extras[:group_by_tag_cols].each do |tc|
        tag = tc[(c.length + 1)..-1]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for group_perf_by_timestamp is too high. [19/11]
Open

  def self.group_perf_by_timestamp(obj, perfs, cols = nil)
    cols ||= Metric::Rollup::ROLLUP_COLS

    result = {}
    counts = {}
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_analysis.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Cyclomatic complexity for value2human is too high. [19/11]
Open

  def self.value2human(val, options = {})
    options = {
      :include_model => true,
      :include_table => true
    }.merge(options)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Method build_value_for_sort_suffix has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_value_for_sort_suffix(value, suffix)
    value = value.in_time_zone(get_time_zone("UTC")) if value && value.kind_of?(Time)
    value = value.to_time.utc.beginning_of_day            if value && value.kind_of?(Date)
    suffix = suffix.to_sym if suffix
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator/sorting.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_run_at has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_run_at
    errors.add(:run_at, "run_at is missing, run_at: [#{run_at.inspect}]") unless run_at
    unless run_at.nil?
      errors.add(:run_at, "run_at is missing :start_time, run_at: [#{run_at.inspect}]") unless run_at[:start_time]
      errors.add(:run_at, "run_at is missing :interval, run_at: [#{run_at.inspect}]") unless run_at[:interval]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_schedule.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method chase_referrals has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def chase_referrals(objs, opts, seen)
    return objs if objs.empty?

    res = []
    objs.each do |o|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_ldap.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method filter_by_tags has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def filter_by_tags(target, options)
    opt_filters = options[:tag_filters]
    return target if opt_filters.blank?

    filters = []
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_provision_virt_workflow.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method server has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def server(data)
        valid, errors = true, []

        keys = data.each_pair.to_a.transpose.first.to_set
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vmdb/settings/validator.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

activated_vms = duplicate_vms.map do |_by, vms|
  active_vms, inactive_vms = vms.partition(&:active)

  # There should only be one of each
  active_vm   = active_vms.first
Severity: Major
Found in tools/reconnect_vms.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
tools/reconnect_hosts.rb on lines 44..61

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 94.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

activated_hosts = duplicate_hosts.map do |_by, hosts|
  active_hosts, inactive_hosts = hosts.partition(&:has_active_ems?)

  # There should only be one of each
  active_host   = active_hosts.first
Severity: Major
Found in tools/reconnect_hosts.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
tools/reconnect_vms.rb on lines 44..61

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 94.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity for gettext is too high. [18/11]
Open

  def self.gettext(text, opts = {})
    return "" if text.blank?

    opts[:type] ||= :column
    opts[:plural] = false if opts[:plural].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/dictionary.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language