Showing 2,968 of 2,968 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def __eq__(self, other):
return isinstance(other, self.__class__) and self.value == other.value
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
right = [next.container[-1].true.value, next.container[-1].false.value]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function is_prunable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_prunable(self, stmt):
if not isinstance(stmt.expr, assign_t):
return False
if isinstance(stmt.expr.op2, call_t):
return False
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function merge_conditions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_conditions(cls, function):
""" perform merge of some conditional statements that can be merged without problem """
merged = None
while merged is not False:
for block in function.blocks.values():
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function equalities
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def equalities(expr):
""" equalities """
# a == b || a > b becomes a >= b
# a == b || a < b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function fetch_recursive_definition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch_recursive_definition(self, context, use):
_def = context.get_local_definition(use)
if _def:
return _def
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function is_prunable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_prunable(self, stmt):
if not isinstance(stmt.expr, assign_t):
return False
if isinstance(stmt.expr.op2, call_t):
return False
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(self):
self.loop.started = True
if self.loop.condition_block is self.loop.start:
if len(self.loop.blocks) == 1 and len(self.loop.start.container) > 1:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function iter_container
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iter_container(self, container):
yield container
for stmt in container:
for _container in stmt.containers:
for __container in self.iter_container(_container):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function expand_branches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_branches(self, blocks=None):
for stmt in iterators.statement_iterator_t(self.function):
if type(stmt) != branch_t:
continue
if blocks and stmt.container.block not in blocks:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function evaluate_flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate_flags(self, expr, flags):
yield assign_t(self.eflags_expr.copy(), expr.copy())
if flags & CF:
yield assign_t(self.cf.copy(), carry_t(self.eflags_expr.copy()))
if flags & PF:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function set_flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_flags(self, flags, value):
if flags & CF:
yield assign_t(self.cf.copy(), value_t(value, 1))
if flags & PF:
yield assign_t(self.pf.copy(), value_t(value, 1))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function remove_goto
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_goto(self, ctn, block):
""" remove goto going to block at the end of the given container """
stmt = ctn[-1]
if type(stmt) == goto_t and stmt.expr.value == block.ea:
stmt.remove()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function propagate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def propagate(self):
for stmt in iterators.statement_iterator_t(self.function):
if type(stmt.expr) != assign_t:
continue
if isinstance(stmt.expr.op2, phi_t) and len(stmt.expr.op1.uses) == 1 and \
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cleanup_loop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cleanup_loop(self, stmt, loop_block, exit_block):
if not stmt.container:
return
self.expand_branches(self.loop.blocks)
if type(stmt) == goto_t and stmt.expr.value == exit_block.ea:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
yield ctx, stmt
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
for _def in (context):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
def process(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
loc = regloc_t(n, function.arch.address_size)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
def make_call_arguments(self, regs):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2