Showing 51 of 52 total issues
Function bindWorker
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private bindWorker(classType: Constructor, filePath: string, workerThreads: typeof import ("worker_threads")) {
const instance = new classType();
const storage: WorkerHandlers = [];
Function bindHandler
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public bindHandler(target: IController, classType: Constructor, property: string, rawParams: FunctionParam[]): RequestHandler {
const paramsGetter = buildParamsFunc(rawParams);
return async (req, res) => {
const ctrl: IController = Object.assign(new classType, target);
Function processBase
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async processBase() {
const auth = DependencyContainer.getContainer().getById("auth") as IAuth<object, object, IUser<object, object>>;
const { app } = this.options;
return async (classType: Constructor<IController>) => {
Function extractBase
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function extractBase(type: Constructor) {
let base: any = { type: null };
if (type === String) {
base.type = "string";
Function buildSchema
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function buildSchema(target: Constructor) {
const instance = new target();
const reflectedProperties = (getDtoProps(Object.getPrototypeOf(instance)));
let requiredProperties = [...reflectedProperties];
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
setScoped(id: string = "default", settings: TypelessComponentEntry<Constructor<T>> = {}) {
shortSet(classType, id, "scoped", settings);
return methods;
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
setSingleton(id: string = "default", settings: TypelessComponentEntry<Constructor<T>> = {}) {
shortSet(classType, id, "singleton", settings);
return methods;
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function extractParamsAliases
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function extractParamsAliases(rawParams: FunctionParam[]) {
const params = [];
for (const { name, type } of rawParams) {
const md = metadata(type);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractBase
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function extractBase(type: Constructor) {
let base: any = { type: null };
if (type === String) {
base.type = "string";
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export function NotFound<T = string>(body?: T): HttpMessage<T | undefined, 404, "text/plain"> {
return createMessage(404, body);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export function Forbidden<T = string>(subMessage?: T ): HttpMessage<T | undefined, 403, "text/plain"> {
return createMessage(403, subMessage);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export function BadRequest<T = string>(body?: T): HttpMessage<T | undefined, 400, "text/plain"> {
return createMessage(400, body);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (metadata(dependency).hasMetadata(INJECT_ID) || predefined) {
const id = depId ||
metadata(Object.getPrototypeOf(parentObject), propertyKey).getMetadata(AUTOWIRED) ||
metadata(dependency).getMetadata(INJECT_ID) ||
Function proccessDependency
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async proccessDependency(parentObject: Instance, dependency: Constructor, depId?: string, propertyKey?: string | symbol) {
// Check if there are any predefined/instantiated components of this type
const predefined = ComponentSettingsStorage.has(dependency) || this.container.contain(dependency);
if (metadata(dependency).hasMetadata(INJECT_ID) || predefined) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findExport
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function findExport(imp: any): any {
if (imp.default && isMainComponent(imp.default)) {
return imp.default;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processProperty<T>(instance: Instance, propertyKey: string | symbol, objectPart: any, prototype: any) {
const type = reflectType(instance, propertyKey);
const sourceValue = objectPart[propertyKey];
const isPrimitive = [ Number, String, Boolean, Object ].includes(type);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ArrayOf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const ArrayOf = (targetClass: any ) => (target: Propotype, propertyKey: string | symbol) => {
const items =
isObject(targetClass) ? targetClass :
isFunction(targetClass) ? DtoSchemaStorage.get(targetClass) :
{ type: targetClass.name.toLoweCase() };
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Shadowed name: 'handler' Open
const handler = storage[message.id];
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Rule: no-shadowed-variable
Disallows shadowing variable declarations.
Rationale
When a variable in a local scope and a variable in the containing scope have the same name, shadowing occurs. Shadowing makes it impossible to access the variable in the containing scope and obscures to what value an identifier actually refers. Compare the following snippets:
const a = 'no shadow';
function print() {
console.log(a);
}
print(); // logs 'no shadow'.
const a = 'no shadow';
function print() {
const a = 'shadow'; // TSLint will complain here.
console.log(a);
}
print(); // logs 'shadow'.
ESLint has an equivalent rule. For more background information, refer to this MDN closure doc.
Config
You can optionally pass an object to disable checking for certain kinds of declarations.
Possible keys are "class"
, "enum"
, "function"
, "import"
, "interface"
, "namespace"
, "typeAlias"
and "typeParameter"
. You can also pass "underscore
" to ignore variable names that begin with _
.
Just set the value to false
for the check you want to disable.
All checks default to true
, i.e. are enabled by default.
Note that you cannot disable variables and parameters.
The option "temporalDeadZone"
defaults to true
which shows errors when shadowing block scoped declarations in their
temporal dead zone. When set to false
parameters, classes, enums and variables declared
with let
or const
are not considered shadowed if the shadowing occurs within their
temporal dead zone.
The following example shows how the "temporalDeadZone"
option changes the linting result:
function fn(value) {
if (value) {
const tmp = value; // no error on this line if "temporalDeadZone" is false
return tmp;
}
let tmp = undefined;
if (!value) {
const tmp = value; // this line always contains an error
return tmp;
}
}
Examples
"no-shadowed-variable": true
"no-shadowed-variable": true,[object Object]
Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"class": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"enum": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"function": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"import": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"interface": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"namespace": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"typeAlias": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"typeParameter": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"temporalDeadZone": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"underscore": {
"type": "boolean"
}
}
}
For more information see this page.
jsdoc is not formatted correctly on this line Open
*@member {string} - Max age of token
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Rule: jsdoc-format
Enforces basic format rules for JSDoc comments.
The following rules are enforced for JSDoc comments (comments starting with /**
):
- each line contains an asterisk and asterisks must be aligned
- each asterisk must be followed by either a space or a newline (except for the first and the last)
- the only characters before the asterisk on each line must be whitespace characters
- one line comments must start with
/**
and end with*/
- multiline comments don't allow text after
/**
in the first line (with option"check-multiline-start"
)
Rationale
Helps maintain a consistent, readable style for JSDoc comments.
Config
You can optionally specify the option "check-multiline-start"
to enforce the first line of a
multiline JSDoc comment to be empty.
Examples
"jsdoc-format": true
"jsdoc-format": true,check-multiline-start
Schema
{
"type": "array",
"minItems": 0,
"maxItems": 1,
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"check-multiline-start"
]
}
}
For more information see this page.
jsdoc is not formatted correctly on this line Open
*@deprecated
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Rule: jsdoc-format
Enforces basic format rules for JSDoc comments.
The following rules are enforced for JSDoc comments (comments starting with /**
):
- each line contains an asterisk and asterisks must be aligned
- each asterisk must be followed by either a space or a newline (except for the first and the last)
- the only characters before the asterisk on each line must be whitespace characters
- one line comments must start with
/**
and end with*/
- multiline comments don't allow text after
/**
in the first line (with option"check-multiline-start"
)
Rationale
Helps maintain a consistent, readable style for JSDoc comments.
Config
You can optionally specify the option "check-multiline-start"
to enforce the first line of a
multiline JSDoc comment to be empty.
Examples
"jsdoc-format": true
"jsdoc-format": true,check-multiline-start
Schema
{
"type": "array",
"minItems": 0,
"maxItems": 1,
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"check-multiline-start"
]
}
}
For more information see this page.