Sign upLogin

Parallels/vagrant-parallels

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 82 of 82 total issues

Method action_ssh_run has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.action_ssh_run
        Vagrant::Action::Builder.new.tap do |b|
          b.use ConfigValidate
          b.use CheckSharedInterface
          b.use Call, IsState, :not_created do |env1, b1|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method convert_to_full has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def convert_to_full(env)
          is_linked = false

          @hdd_list.each do |hdd_dir|
            disk_desc = File.join(hdd_dir, 'DiskDescriptor.xml')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/export.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def call(env)
          name = env[:machine].provider_config.name

          # If we already set the name before, then don't do anything
          sentinel = env[:machine].data_dir.join('action_set_name')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/set_name.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method read_bridged_interfaces has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def read_bridged_interfaces
          host_hw_info = read_host_info.fetch('Hardware info', {})
          net_list = host_hw_info.select do |name, attrs|
            # Get all network interfaces except 'vnicXXX'
            attrs.fetch('type') == 'net' and name !~ /^(vnic(.+?))$/
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/driver/base.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def call(env)
          @machine = env[:machine]

          if !@machine.provider_config.check_guest_tools
            @logger.info('Not checking Parallels Tools because of configuration')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/handle_guest_tools.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def initialize(uuid=nil)
          # Setup the base
          super(uuid)

          @logger = Log4r::Logger.new('vagrant_parallels::driver::meta')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/driver/meta.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def call(env)
          files = {}
          env['package.include'].each do |file|
            source = Pathname.new(file)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/setup_package_files.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mount_parallels_shared_folder has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.mount_parallels_shared_folder(machine, name, guestpath, options)
          machine.communicate.tap do |comm|
            # clear prior symlink
            if comm.test("test -L \"#{guestpath}\"", :sudo => true)
              comm.sudo("rm \"#{guestpath}\"")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/guest_cap/darwin/mount_parallels_shared_folder.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.action_snapshot_delete
        Vagrant::Action::Builder.new.tap do |b|
          b.use Call, IsState, :not_created do |env1, b1|
            if env1[:result]
              b1.use Message, I18n.t('vagrant.commands.common.vm_not_created')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb on lines 216..222

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method ssh_ip has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def ssh_ip
          5.times do
            ip = read_guest_ip_dhcp
            return ip unless ip.empty?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/driver/base.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.action_snapshot_save
        Vagrant::Action::Builder.new.tap do |b|
          b.use Call, IsState, :not_created do |env1, b1|
            if env1[:result]
              b1.use Message, I18n.t('vagrant.commands.common.vm_not_created')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb on lines 184..190

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method read_host_only_interfaces has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def read_host_only_interfaces
          net_list = read_virtual_networks
          net_list.keep_if { |net| net['Type'] == 'host-only' }

          hostonly_ifaces = []
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/driver/base.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mount_parallels_shared_folder has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.mount_parallels_shared_folder(machine, name, guestpath, options)
          # Sanity check for mount options: we are not supporting
          # VirtualBox-specific 'fmode' and 'dmode' options
          if options[:mount_options]
            invalid_opts = options[:mount_options].select do |opt|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/guest_cap/linux/mount_parallels_shared_folder.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method read_shared_interface has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def read_shared_interface
          net_info = json do
            execute_prlsrvctl('net', 'info', read_shared_network_id, '--json')
          end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/driver/base.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method install_parallels_tools has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.install_parallels_tools(machine)
          machine.communicate.tap do |comm|
            # Get the host arch. This is safe even if an older x86-only Vagrant version is used.
            arch = `arch -64 uname -m`.chomp
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/guest_cap/windows/install_parallels_tools.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method action_up has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.action_up
        Vagrant::Action::Builder.new.tap do |b|
          # Handle box_url downloading early so that if the Vagrantfile
          # references any files in the box or something it all just
          # works fine.
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if interface[:ipv6] && this_netaddr.ipv6?
              netaddr = IPAddr.new("#{interface[:ipv6]}/#{interface[:ipv6_prefix]}")
              return interface if netaddr.include? this_netaddr
            end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/network.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/action/network.rb on lines 461..464

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

              machine.communicate.execute(uid_command,
                error_class: Errors::ParallelsMountFailed,
                error_key: :parallels_mount_failed,
                command: uid_command,
                output: output[:stderr]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/util/unix_mount_helpers.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/util/unix_mount_helpers.rb on lines 48..53

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if interface[:ip] && this_netaddr.ipv4?
              netaddr = IPAddr.new("#{interface[:ip]}/#{interface[:netmask]}")
              return interface if netaddr.include? this_netaddr
            end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/action/network.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/action/network.rb on lines 466..469

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                machine.communicate.execute(gid_command,
                  error_class: Errors::ParallelsMountFailed,
                  error_key: :parallels_mount_failed,
                  command: gid_command,
                  output: output[:stderr]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vagrant-parallels/util/unix_mount_helpers.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/vagrant-parallels/util/unix_mount_helpers.rb on lines 27..32

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language