SU-SWS/stanford_profile_helper

View on GitHub
modules/stanford_intranet/src/Commands/IntranetCommands.php

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage
A
100%

Method setupIntranet has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Wontfix

  public function setupIntranet($options = [
    'roles' => '',
    'affiliations' => '',
    'users' => '',
    'workgroups' => '',
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/stanford_intranet/src/Commands/IntranetCommands.php - About 1 hr to fix

    The method setupIntranet() has an NPath complexity of 512. The configured NPath complexity threshold is 200.
    Wontfix

      public function setupIntranet($options = [
        'roles' => '',
        'affiliations' => '',
        'users' => '',
        'workgroups' => '',

    NPathComplexity

    Since: 0.1

    The NPath complexity of a method is the number of acyclic execution paths through that method. A threshold of 200 is generally considered the point where measures should be taken to reduce complexity.

    Example

    class Foo {
        function bar() {
            // lots of complicated code
        }
    }

    Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#npathcomplexity

    The method setupIntranet() has a Cyclomatic Complexity of 11. The configured cyclomatic complexity threshold is 10.
    Wontfix

      public function setupIntranet($options = [
        'roles' => '',
        'affiliations' => '',
        'users' => '',
        'workgroups' => '',

    CyclomaticComplexity

    Since: 0.1

    Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.

    Example

    // Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
    class Foo {
    1   public function example() {
    2       if ($a == $b) {
    3           if ($a1 == $b1) {
                    fiddle();
    4           } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
                    fiddle();
                } else {
                    fiddle();
                }
    5       } elseif ($c == $d) {
    6           while ($c == $d) {
                    fiddle();
                }
    7        } elseif ($e == $f) {
    8           for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
                    fiddle();
                }
            } else {
                switch ($z) {
    9               case 1:
                        fiddle();
                        break;
    10              case 2:
                        fiddle();
                        break;
    11              case 3:
                        fiddle();
                        break;
                    default:
                        fiddle();
                        break;
                }
            }
        }
    }

    Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Wontfix

      public function __construct(EntityTypeManagerInterface $entity_type_manager, StateInterface $state, AuthmapInterface $authmap, PasswordGeneratorInterface $password_generator, StanfordIntranetManagerInterface $intranet_manager) {
        $this->entityTypeManager = $entity_type_manager;
        $this->state = $state;
        $this->authmap = $authmap;
        $this->passwordGenerator = $password_generator;
    modules/stanford_intranet/src/StanfordIntranetManager.php on lines 65..71
    src/Config/ConfigOverrides.php on lines 70..76

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 84.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Variable $workgroup is undefined.
    Invalid

          [$workgroup, $role_name] = explode('=', $mapping);

    Variable $role_name is undefined.
    Invalid

            ->load($role_name);

    Variable $role_name is undefined.
    Invalid

          [$workgroup, $role_name] = explode('=', $mapping);

    Variable $role_name is undefined.
    Invalid

              ->loadByProperties(['label' => $role_name]);

    Variable $workgroup is undefined.
    Invalid

          $values[] = $role->id() . ":eduPersonEntitlement,=,$workgroup";

    Variable $role_name is undefined.
    Invalid

              ->write(sprintf('No role found with the name %s.', $role_name), TRUE);

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status