Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Method textChanged has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void textChanged() {
        if (getText().trim().isEmpty()) {
            value = null;

            if (optional) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/ui/IntTextField.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getMatrixAttribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private Object getMatrixAttribute(boolean id, boolean name, boolean detail) throws PmmException {
        PmmXmlDoc matrixXmlDoc = getMatrix();
        if (matrixXmlDoc == null) matrixXmlDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
        MatrixXml mx = null;
        for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : matrixXmlDoc.getElementSet()) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/PmmTimeSeries.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method performPaste has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void performPaste() {
        int startRow = getSelectedRows()[0];
        int startCol = getSelectedColumns()[0];
        Clipboard system = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemClipboard();
        String trstring = null;
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/ui/TimeSeriesTable.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method loadSettingsFrom has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    protected void loadSettingsFrom(NodeSettingsRO settings,
            PortObject[] inObjects) throws NotConfigurableException { 
        PCMLPortObject pcmlPortObject = (PCMLPortObject) inObjects[0];
        PCMLDocument pcmlDoc = pcmlPortObject.getPcmlDoc();
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.foodprocess.view/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/foodprocess/view/ViewNodeDialog.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getNameList has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static List<String> getNameList(PmmXmlDoc xml) {
        List<String> names = new ArrayList<>();

        for (PmmXmlElementConvertable element : xml.getElementSet()) {
            if (element instanceof MiscXml) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/CellIO.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initDatabase has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void initDatabase() throws SQLException, ClassNotFoundException, IOException {

        final Properties fastImportProperties = new Properties();
        fastImportProperties.put("LOG", 0);
        fastImportProperties.put("CACHE_SIZE", 65536);
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.service/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/service/FskService.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method evalWithSingularityCheck has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        private double evalWithSingularityCheck(int index, double[] argValues,
                double[] paramValues) throws ParseException {
            for (int i = 0; i < parameters.length; i++) {
                parser.setVarValue(parameters[i], paramValues[i]);
            }
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/math/ParameterOptimizer.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getDataPoints has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private LinkedList<DataPoint> getDataPoints(LinkedList<ConcentrationData> concs, LinkedList<ConditionsData> conds) {

        // Gets time values
        List<Integer> timeValues = new LinkedList<>();
        for (ConcentrationData conc : concs) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.foodprocess.pcml/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pcml/node/xls2pcml/XLS2PCMLNodeModel.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method addOutport has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static Outport addOutport(final ProcessNode processNode, 
            final PCMLPortObjectSpec spec) {
        Outport outport = processNode.addNewOutport();
        // add matrices
        MatrixRecipe matrixRecipe = outport.addNewMatrixRecipe();
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.foodprocess.pcml/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pcml/port/PCMLUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _create has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    async _create() {
        let O = this;
        _log('TABLE / _create', 'primary');

        // current state of view
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.table.js - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static void check4Updates_174_175() {
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("EstModelPrimView") + ";", false);
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("EstModelSecView") + ";", false);
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("ParamView") + ";", false);
        new SQLScriptImporter().doImport("/org/hsh/bfr/db/res/001_ParamVarView_175.sql", null, false);
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/UpdateChecker.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/UpdateChecker.java on lines 151..158

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 105.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static void check4Updates_182_183() {
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("EstModelPrimView") + ";", false);
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("EstModelSecView") + ";", false);
        DBKernel.sendRequest("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS " + DBKernel.delimitL("ParamView") + ";", false);
        new SQLScriptImporter().doImport("/org/hsh/bfr/db/res/001_ParamVarView_183.sql", null, false);
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/UpdateChecker.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/UpdateChecker.java on lines 480..487

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 105.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : indepVarSec.getElementSet()) {
                IndepXml iv = (IndepXml) el;

                if (!secAssign.containsKey(iv.name)) {
                    error = true;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 266..279
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/PrimaryJoiner.java on lines 206..219
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/SecondaryJoiner.java on lines 307..321

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : indepVar.getElementSet()) {
                IndepXml iv = (IndepXml) el;

                if (!primAssign.containsKey(iv.name)) {
                    error = true;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 286..299
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/PrimaryJoiner.java on lines 206..219
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/SecondaryJoiner.java on lines 307..321

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : indepVarsSec
                            .getElementSet()) {
                        IndepXml iv = (IndepXml) el;

                        if (!replace.containsKey(iv.name)) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/SecondaryJoiner.java and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 266..279
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 286..299
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/PrimaryJoiner.java on lines 206..219

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : oldIndepVar.getElementSet()) {
                IndepXml iv = (IndepXml) el;

                if (!assign.containsKey(iv.name)) {
                    error = true;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/PrimaryJoiner.java and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 266..279
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/CombinedJoiner.java on lines 286..299
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelanddatajoiner/SecondaryJoiner.java on lines 307..321

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : paramMap.get(id).getElementSet()) {
                ParamXml element = (ParamXml) el;

                constants.put(element.name, element.value);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarypredictorview/TableReader.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarymodelanddataview/TableReader.java on lines 353..366

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : indepVarMap.get(id)
                    .getElementSet()) {
                IndepXml element = (IndepXml) el;

                arguments.put(element.name,
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarymodelanddataview/TableReader.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarypredictorview/TableReader.java on lines 333..344

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static List<KnimeTuple> getTuples(DataTable table) {
        
        boolean isTertiaryModel = SchemaFactory.createM12Schema().conforms(
                table);
        boolean containsData = SchemaFactory.createDataSchema().conforms(table);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/predictorview/PredictorViewNodeModel.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/ModelPlotterNodeModel.java on lines 341..363

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (!plotable.isPlotable()) {
                stringColumns.get(ChartConstants.STATUS).add(
                        ChartConstants.FAILED);
            } else if (PmmUtilities.isOutOfRange(paramMap.get(id))) {
                stringColumns.get(ChartConstants.STATUS).add(
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarymodelanddataview/TableReader.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/secondarypredictorview/TableReader.java on lines 447..458

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language