SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                        System.err.println("not calculatable: " + lastConc + "\t" + lastConcConverted + "\t" + t + "\t" + newT + "\t" + tempVal + "\t" + phVal + "\t" + awVal);
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.bfrdbiface.lib/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/bfrdbiface/lib/Bfrdb.java on lines 556..557

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      } else {
        
         secondFskObj = runSnippet(handler, secondFskObj, fskSimulationSecond, context);


de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_9_0/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v1_9/runner/RunnerNodeModel.java on lines 249..262

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (!(firstFskObj instanceof CombinedFskPortObject)) {
        firstFskObj = runSnippet(handler, firstFskObj, fskSimulationFirst, context);
        // save output from simulation by using current output name (with suffixes)
        // save is done by running the command in R
        JoinerNodeUtil.saveOutputVariable( oopFirst ,handler, exec);
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_9_0/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v1_9/runner/RunnerNodeModel.java on lines 299..316

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    private IndepXml findIndep(final String name) {
        for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : independent.getElementSet()) {
            if (el instanceof IndepXml) {
                IndepXml indep = (IndepXml) el;
                if (indep.name.equals(name)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/ParametricModel.java on lines 569..579

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, String> getMatrixDetailMap() {
            Map<String, String> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), matrixDetails.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, MatrixXml> getMatrixMap() {
            Map<String, MatrixXml> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), matrices.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, AgentXml> getAgentMap() {
            Map<String, AgentXml> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), agents.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, String> getAgentDetailMap() {
            Map<String, String> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), agentDetails.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, List<TimeSeriesXml>> getTimeSeriesMap() {
            Map<String, List<TimeSeriesXml>> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), timeSeries.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, Integer> getQualityScoreMap() {
            Map<String, Integer> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), qualityScores.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, String> getCommentMap() {
            Map<String, String> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), comments.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, Boolean> getCheckedMap() {
            Map<String, Boolean> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), checks.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 845..853

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        public Map<String, List<LiteratureItem>> getReferenceMap() {
            Map<String, List<LiteratureItem>> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();

            for (int i = 0; i < getRowCount(); i++) {
                map.put(ids.get(i), references.get(i));
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 765..773
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 775..783
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 785..793
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 795..803
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 805..813
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 815..823
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 825..833
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/microbialdataedit/MicrobialDataEditNodeDialog.java on lines 835..843

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            xlsReader.getTimeSeriesTuples(KnimeUtils.getFile(set.getFileName()), set.getSheetName(),
                    set.getColumnMappings(), set.getTimeUnit(), set.getConcentrationUnit(), set.getAgentColumn(),
                    set.getAgentMappings(), set.getMatrixColumn(), set.getMatrixMappings(), set.isPreserveIds(),
                    set.getUsedIds());
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeModel.java on lines 73..77

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  private static URI getLibURI() throws InvalidSettingsException {
    switch (Platform.getOS()) {
      case Platform.OS_WIN32:
        return URIS.zip;
      case Platform.OS_MACOSX:
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_0_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/writer/FskxWriterNodeModel.java on lines 179..190

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        List<KnimeTuple> tuples = new ArrayList<>(xlsReader
                .getTimeSeriesTuples(KnimeUtils.getFile(set.getFileName()), set.getSheetName(), set.getColumnMappings(),
                        set.getTimeUnit(), set.getConcentrationUnit(), set.getAgentColumn(), set.getAgentMappings(),
                        set.getMatrixColumn(), set.getMatrixMappings(), set.isPreserveIds(), set.getUsedIds())
                .values());
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java on lines 349..352

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  private static URI getLibURI() throws InvalidSettingsException {
    switch (Platform.getOS()) {
      case Platform.OS_WIN32:
        return URIS.zip;
      case Platform.OS_MACOSX:
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_0_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/reader/FskxReaderNodeModel.java on lines 261..272

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public PublicationType createPublicationTypeFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        PublicationType result = PublicationType.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 376..380
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 396..400

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public ParameterType createParameterTypeFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        ParameterType result = ParameterType.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 356..360
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 376..380

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public ParameterClassification createParameterClassificationFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        ParameterClassification result = ParameterClassification.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 356..360
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 396..400

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language