Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Method eIsSet has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public boolean eIsSet(int featureID) {
        switch (featureID) {
            case MetadataPackage.HAZARD__HAZARD_TYPE:
                return HAZARD_TYPE_EDEFAULT == null ? hazardType != null : !HAZARD_TYPE_EDEFAULT.equals(hazardType);
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/HazardImpl.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method eIsSet has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public boolean eIsSet(int featureID) {
        switch (featureID) {
            case MetadataPackage.CONTACT__TITLE:
                return TITLE_EDEFAULT == null ? title != null : !TITLE_EDEFAULT.equals(title);
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/ContactImpl.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method loadSettings has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void loadSettings(NodeSettingsRO settings) {
        try {
            selectedIDs = XmlConverter.xmlToObject(
                    settings.getString(CFG_SELECTEDIDS),
                    new ArrayList<String>());
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/predictorview/SettingsHelper.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method saveSettingsTo has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    protected void saveSettingsTo(NodeSettingsWO settings) throws InvalidSettingsException {
        set.setPreserveIds(preserveIdsBox.isSelected());
        cleanMaps();
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method performExecute has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    protected PortObject[] performExecute(PortObject[] inObjects,
            ExecutionContext exec) throws Exception {
        
        BufferedDataTable table = (BufferedDataTable)inObjects[0];
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/ModelPlotterNodeModel.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method loadFromNodeSettings has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  public void loadFromNodeSettings(final NodeSettingsRO settings) {
    try {
      String modelName = settings.getString(MODEL_NAME, null);
      if (modelName != null) {
        template.setModelName(modelName);
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/openfsmr/FSMRTemplateSettings.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getDBLField has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private String getDBLField(String xlsFieldName, String dbFieldName) {
        if (xlsFieldName.startsWith(dbFieldName + "-")) {
            if (xlsFieldName.startsWith(dbFieldName + "-Wert")) return dbFieldName;//"Einzelwert";
            if (xlsFieldName.startsWith(dbFieldName + "-Wiederholungen")) return dbFieldName;//"Wiederholungen";
            if (xlsFieldName.startsWith(dbFieldName + "-Exponent")) return dbFieldName;//"Exponent";
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/imports/GeneralXLSImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method doImport has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public String doImport(final String filename, final JProgressBar progress, final boolean showResults) {
          Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @SuppressWarnings("resource")
            public void run() {
                  try {
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/imports/SQLScriptImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getReihenfolgePrev has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        private int getReihenfolgePrev(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge) {
            int wegPfeile = 0; // Ein Knoten kann mehrere Pfeile haben, die ihn verlassen ..., z.B. Salami_Test_Britta, gleich der erste Knoten "Wareneingang" führt zum einen zu "Speck (Meat, Raw)" zum anderen zu "Schweinefleich , roh (Meat, Raw)"
            if (indexReihenfolge != null) {
                Vector<Vector<Integer>> rhflgn = new Vector<>();
                int firstIndex = indexReihenfolge.get(0);
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/imports/custom/MyProzessXMLImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getViewRepresentation has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  public JoinerViewRepresentation getViewRepresentation() {

    JoinerViewRepresentation representation;
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_9_0/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v1_9/joiner/JoinerNodeModel.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getPoints has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public double[][] getPoints(String paramX, String paramY, String unitX,
            String unitY, String transformX, String transformY,
            Map<String, Integer> choice) throws ConvertException {
        List<Double> xList = valueLists.get(paramX);
        List<Double> yList = valueLists.get(paramY);
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/chart/Plotable.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getColumnName has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        @Override
        public String getColumnName(int column) {
            switch (column) {
            case 0:
                return ID;
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/chart/ChartSelectionPanel.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method updatePrimaryIndepRanges has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static void updatePrimaryIndepRanges(List<KnimeTuple> tuples,
            Map<KnimeTuple, List<KnimeTuple>> tupleCombinations) {
        Map<Integer, Map<String, Double>> indepMin = new LinkedHashMap<>();
        Map<Integer, Map<String, Double>> indepMax = new LinkedHashMap<>();
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/ModelCombiner.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (String column : columnButtons.keySet()) {
                if (e.getSource() == columnButtons.get(column)) {
                    Integer id;

                    if (set.getColumnMappings().get(column) instanceof MiscXml) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlsmodelreader/XLSModelReaderNodeDialog.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java on lines 462..492

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for (String column : columnButtons.keySet()) {
                if (e.getSource() == columnButtons.get(column)) {
                    Integer id;

                    if (set.getColumnMappings().get(column) instanceof MiscXml) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlsmodelreader/XLSModelReaderNodeDialog.java on lines 642..672

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    if (rs3 != null && rs3.first()) {
                        do {
                            result += rs3.getInt("ID");
                            if (resRowFirst[fieldnames.length+1] == null || resRowFirst[fieldnames.length+1].isEmpty()) resRowFirst[fieldnames.length+1] = rs3.getInt("ID")+"";
                            else resRowFirst[fieldnames.length+1] += "," + rs3.getInt("ID")+"";
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/actions/PlausibleAction.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/actions/PlausibleAction.java on lines 439..450

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                            if (rs3 != null && rs3.first()) {
                                do {
                                    result += rs3.getInt("ID");
                                    if (resRowOther[fieldnames.length+1] == null || resRowOther[fieldnames.length+1].isEmpty()) resRowOther[fieldnames.length+1] = rs3.getInt("ID")+"";
                                    else resRowOther[fieldnames.length+1] += "," + rs3.getInt("ID")+"";
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/actions/PlausibleAction.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/actions/PlausibleAction.java on lines 393..404

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        callOnFinish: function () {
            this.writeToInput();

            if (this.options.onFinish && typeof this.options.onFinish === "function") {
                if (this.options.scope) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/ion.rangeSlider.js and 2 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/ion.rangeSlider.js on lines 1684..1694
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/ion.rangeSlider.js on lines 1706..1716

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 123.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (o.endDate !== Infinity){
                if (!!o.endDate){
                    if (o.endDate instanceof Date)
                        o.endDate = this._local_to_utc(this._zero_time(o.endDate));
                    else
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 245..255

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 123.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (o.endDate !== Infinity){
                if (!!o.endDate){
                    if (o.endDate instanceof Date)
                        o.endDate = this._local_to_utc(this._zero_time(o.endDate));
                    else
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 250..260

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 123.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language