Sign upLogin

SpamExperts/OrangeAssassin

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 802 of 802 total issues

Function main has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def main():
    options = parse_arguments(sys.argv[1:])
    oa.config.LAZY_MODE = not options.lazy_mode
    logger = oa.config.setup_logging("oa-logger", debug=options.debug)
    config_files = oa.config.get_config_files(options.configpath,
Severity: Minor
Found in scripts/match.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function check_illegal_chars has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def check_illegal_chars(self, msg, header, ratio, count, target=None):
        """look for 8-bit and other illegal characters that should be MIME
        encoded, these might want to exempt languages that do not use
        Latin-based alphabets, but only if the user wants it that way
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/header_eval.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function check_dkim_adsp has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def check_dkim_adsp(self, msg, adsp_char="", domains_list=None,
                        target=None):
        """Check Author Domain Signing Practices from any author domains or
        from specified author domains only when there is no valid signature. """
        if not self.dkim_checked_signature:
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/dkim.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function main. (19)
Open

def main():
    options = parse_arguments(sys.argv[1:])
    oa.config.LAZY_MODE = not options.lazy_mode
    logger = oa.config.setup_logging("oa-logger", debug=options.debug)
    config_files = oa.config.get_config_files(options.configpath,
Severity: Minor
Found in scripts/match.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method check_illegal_chars. (19)
Open

    def check_illegal_chars(self, msg, header, ratio, count, target=None):
        """look for 8-bit and other illegal characters that should be MIME
        encoded, these might want to exempt languages that do not use
        Latin-based alphabets, but only if the user wants it that way
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/header_eval.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function check_for_to_in_subject has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def check_for_to_in_subject(self, msg, test, target=None):
        """
        Check if to address is in Subject field.

        If it is called with 'address', check if full address is in subject,
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/header_eval.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function check_freemail_replyto has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def check_freemail_replyto(self, msg, option=None, target=None):
        """Checks/compares freemail addresses found from headers and body
        Possible options:
            - replyto    From: or body address is different than Reply-To
                        (this is the default)
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/free_mail.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def learn_message(self, msg, isspam):
        """Learn the message has spam or ham."""
        if not self["use_bayes"]:
            return
        # XXX In SA, there is a time limit set here.
Severity: Major
Found in oa/plugins/bayes.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
oa/plugins/bayes.py on lines 692..702

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def forget_message(self, msg, msgid):
        """Unlearn a message."""
        if not self["use_bayes"]:
            return
        # XXX SA wraps this in a timer.
Severity: Major
Found in oa/plugins/bayes.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
oa/plugins/bayes.py on lines 612..622

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method check_dkim_adsp. (18)
Open

    def check_dkim_adsp(self, msg, adsp_char="", domains_list=None,
                        target=None):
        """Check Author Domain Signing Practices from any author domains or
        from specified author domains only when there is no valid signature. """
        if not self.dkim_checked_signature:
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/plugins/dkim.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method check_for_skip. (18)
Open

    @staticmethod
    def check_for_skip(header):
        """STUFF TO IGNORE

        # Received headers which doesn't start with 'from'
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/received_parser.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

File context.py has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""Defines global and per-message context."""

from builtins import dict
from builtins import object
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/context.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @_memoize("addr_headers")
    def get_addr_header(self, header_name):
        """Get a list of the first addresses from this header."""
        values = list()
        for value in self.get_decoded_header(header_name):
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/message.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
    oa/message.py on lines 287..296

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 71.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @_memoize("name_headers")
    def get_name_header(self, header_name):
        """Get a list of the first names from this header."""
        values = list()
        for value in self.get_decoded_header(header_name):
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/message.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
    oa/message.py on lines 255..264

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 71.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _interpolate. (16)
    Open

        def _interpolate(self, text, msg):
        if msg.interpolate_data:
            return text % msg.interpolate_data

        spam = msg.score >= self.conf["required_score"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function _parse_sender has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _parse_sender(self):
        """Extract the envelope sender from the message."""

        always_trust_envelope_from = self.ctxt.conf[
            'always_trust_envelope_sender']
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/message.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def check_in_TL_TLDS(self, address):
        if address in self["util_rb_tld"]:
            return True
        if address in self["util_rb_2tld"]:
            return True
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/plugins/wlbl_eval.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
    oa/plugins/header_eval.py on lines 680..687

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 67.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def check_in_TL_TLDS(self, address):
        if address in self["util_rb_tld"]:
            return True
        if address in self["util_rb_2tld"]:
            return True
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/plugins/header_eval.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
    oa/plugins/wlbl_eval.py on lines 237..244

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 67.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    File ruleset.py has 306 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    """A set of rules."""

from builtins import dict
from builtins import object
from builtins import str
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 3 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method check_freemail_header. (15)
      Open

          def check_freemail_header(self, msg, header, regex=None, target=None):
        """Check all possible 'from' headers to see if sender
        is freemail. It is possible to provide a regex
        rule to match against too.
      Severity: Minor
      Found in oa/plugins/free_mail.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language