Showing 12,628 of 12,628 total issues
Function default
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function ({ commit, state }, args) {
const observation = getObservationFromArgs(state, args)
if (observation?.id) { return Promise.resolve() }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function default
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function ({ dispatch, state, commit }, descriptorId) {
const observations = state.observations.filter(
(o) => o.descriptorId === descriptorId && o.isUnsaved
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function default
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function ({ dispatch, state, commit }, { rowObjectId, rowObjectType }) {
const observations = state.observations.filter(o => o.isUnsaved)
return Promise.all(observations.map(o => {
if (isQualitativeObservation(o)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function saveAssertedDistribution
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async saveAssertedDistribution() {
if (!this.isSaveAvailable) return
const assertedDistribution = makeAssertedDistributionPayload({
ad: this.assertedDistribution,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_combination_relationship
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_combination_relationship
s = self.subject_taxon_name
list = s.list_of_coordinated_names + [s]
if s.rank_string =~ /Species/
s_new = list.detect{|t| t.rank_class.rank_name == 'species'}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_species
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_species
fixed = false
return false unless self.original_species.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.original_species.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_etymology
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_etymology
fixed = false
return false unless self.etymology.blank?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.etymology.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_primary_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_primary_types
if is_species_rank? && is_available?
if self.type_materials.primary.empty? && self.type_materials.syntypes.empty?
soft_validations.add(:base, 'Primary type is not selected')
elsif self.type_materials.primary.count > 1 || (!self.type_materials.primary.empty? && !self.type_materials.syntypes.empty?)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method using_orcid_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def using_orcid_class
unless identifier.nil?
orcid = identifier.upcase
/^(?<preamble>http[s]?:\/\/){0,1}(?<domain>orcid\.org\/){1}(?<part_1>\d{4})-(?<part_2>\d{4})-(?<part_3>\d{4})-(?<part_4>\d{3})(?<last>.)$/i =~ orcid
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_add_synonym_for_homonym
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_add_synonym_for_homonym
if subject_taxon_name.iczn_set_as_synonym_of.nil?
unless subject_taxon_name.iczn_replacement_names.empty?
subject_taxon_name.iczn_set_as_synonym_of = object_taxon_name
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method is_metadata_depiction?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_metadata_depiction?
if depiction_params && !depiction_params.empty?
a = depiction_params[:is_metadata_depiction]
((a == 'true') || (a == true)) ? true : false
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_dwc_occurrence
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_dwc_occurrence
retried = false
begin
if dwc_occurrence_persisted?
dwc_occurrence.generate_uuid_if_required # TODO: at some point when syncronized make this optional
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_source
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_source
fixed = false
pg = nil
return false unless self.source.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_form
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_form
fixed = false
return false unless self.original_form.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.original_form.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_type_genus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_type_genus
fixed = false
return false unless self.type_genus.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.type_genus.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method some_roles_present
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def some_roles_present
ATTRIBUTION_ROLES.each do |r|
return true if send("#{r}_roles".to_sym).any?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_validate_coordinated_names_source
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_validate_coordinated_names_source
return true unless is_valid?
s = self.source
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if ((s && t.source && s.id != t.source.id) || (s.nil? && t.source))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_subgenus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_subgenus
fixed = false
return false unless self.original_subgenus.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.original_subgenus.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_variety
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sv_fix_coordinated_names_original_variety
fixed = false
return false unless self.original_variety.nil?
list_of_coordinated_names.each do |t|
if !t.original_variety.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_name_format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate_name_format(taxon_name)
taxon_name.errors.add(:name, 'name must be capitalized') unless !taxon_name.name.blank? && taxon_name.name == taxon_name.name.capitalize
taxon_name.errors.add(:name, 'name must be at least two letters') unless taxon_name.name.length > 1
taxon_name.errors.add(:name, 'name must not end in -virus') if (taxon_name.name =~ /.*virus\Z/) && taxon_name.name.length > 1
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"