Sign upLogin

TabbycatDebate/tabbycat

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 449 of 449 total issues

File emoji.py has 1720 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import random
import logging
from typing import Tuple, Optional
Severity: Major
Found in tabbycat/participants/emoji.py - About 3 days to fix

    File serializers.py has 1246 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    from collections import OrderedDict
from collections.abc import Mapping
from datetime import date, datetime, time
from functools import partial, partialmethod
    Severity: Major
    Found in tabbycat/api/serializers.py - About 2 days to fix

      File views.py has 1170 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      from copy import deepcopy
from itertools import groupby

from asgiref.sync import async_to_sync
from channels.layers import get_channel_layer
      Severity: Major
      Found in tabbycat/api/views.py - About 1 day to fix

        Function _import has a Cognitive Complexity of 90 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _import(self, csvfile, model, interpreter=make_interpreter(), expect_unique=None):
        """Parses the object given in f, using the callable interpreter to parse
        each line, and passing the arguments to the given model's constructor.
        `csvfile` can be any object that is supported by csv.DictReader(), which
        includes file objects and lists of strings.
        Severity: Minor
        Found in tabbycat/importer/importers/base.py - About 1 day to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function import_results has a Cognitive Complexity of 74 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def import_results(self):
        for round in self.root.findall('round'):
            consensus = self.preliminary_consensus if round.get('elimination') == 'false' else self.elimination_consensus

            for debate in round.findall('debate'):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in tabbycat/importer/archive.py - About 1 day to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function populate_results has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def populate_results(ballotsubs, tournament=None):
    """Populates the `_result` attribute of each BallotSubmission in
    `ballotsubs` with a populated DebateResult instance.

    For best performance, the ballot submissions should already have their
        Severity: Minor
        Found in tabbycat/results/prefetch.py - About 1 day to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        File result.py has 862 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        """Debate result classes.

Debate result classes aggregate scoresheets to produce results for an entire
debate, and interact with the database with respect to models recording scores
given in the debate. They do not deal with metadata (like motions), only scores
        Severity: Major
        Found in tabbycat/results/result.py - About 1 day to fix

          File tables.py has 856 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          import logging
import warnings

from django.contrib.auth.models import AnonymousUser
from django.contrib.humanize.templatetags.humanize import ordinal
          Severity: Major
          Found in tabbycat/utils/tables.py - About 1 day to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                class EventType(models.TextChoices):
        POINTS = 'p', _("team points")
        BALLOTS_CONFIRMED = 'c', _("ballot confirmed")
        FEEDBACK_URL = 'f', _("feedback URL")
        BALLOT_URL = 'b', _("ballot URL")
            Severity: Major
            Found in tabbycat/notifications/models.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
            tabbycat/notifications/models.py on lines 87..98

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 138.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                class EventType(models.TextChoices):
        PROCESSED = 'processed', _("Processed")
        DROPPED = 'dropped', _("Dropped")
        DEFERRED = 'deferred', _("Deferred")
        DELIVERED = 'delivered', _("Delivered")
            Severity: Major
            Found in tabbycat/notifications/models.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
            tabbycat/notifications/models.py on lines 45..56

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 138.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _import. (41)
            Open

                def _import(self, csvfile, model, interpreter=make_interpreter(), expect_unique=None):
        """Parses the object given in f, using the callable interpreter to parse
        each line, and passing the arguments to the given model's constructor.
        `csvfile` can be any object that is supported by csv.DictReader(), which
        includes file objects and lists of strings.
            Severity: Minor
            Found in tabbycat/importer/importers/base.py by radon

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Function setSorting has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                setSorting (state, sortType) {
      let debatesArray = Object.values(state.debatesOrPanels)

      if (debatesArray.length === 0) {
        return // e.g. Preformed Panels page prior to use
            Severity: Minor
            Found in tabbycat/templates/allocations/DragAndDropStore.js - About 6 hrs to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    for adj1, adj2 in combinations(debate.adjudicators.all(), 2):

            if conflicts.personal_conflict_adj_adj(adj1, adj2):
                conflict_messages[debate].append(("danger", _(
                    "Conflict: <strong>%(adjudicator1)s</strong> & <strong>%(adjudicator2)s</strong> "
            Severity: Major
            Found in tabbycat/adjallocation/utils.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
            tabbycat/adjallocation/utils.py on lines 25..40

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 125.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    for adj, team in product(debate.adjudicators.all(), debate.teams):

            if conflicts.personal_conflict_adj_team(adj, team):
                conflict_messages[debate].append(("danger", _(
                    "Conflict: <strong>%(adjudicator)s</strong> & <strong>%(team)s</strong> "
            Severity: Major
            Found in tabbycat/adjallocation/utils.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
            tabbycat/adjallocation/utils.py on lines 43..58

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 125.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            File forms.py has 792 lines of code (exceeds 600 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            import logging
from decimal import Decimal
from itertools import product
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
            Severity: Major
            Found in tabbycat/results/forms.py - About 6 hrs to fix

              Function add_debate_adjudicators_column has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def add_debate_adjudicators_column(self, debates, title="Adjudicators",
            show_splits=False, highlight_adj=None, for_admin=False):
        da_data = []

        def construct_text(adjs_data):
              Severity: Minor
              Found in tabbycat/utils/tables.py - About 6 hrs to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def import_rounds(self, f):
        interpreter_part = make_interpreter(
            tournament=self.tournament,
            stage=self.lookup_round_stage,
            draw_type=self.lookup_draw_type,
              Severity: Major
              Found in tabbycat/importer/importers/boots.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
              tabbycat/importer/importers/anorak.py on lines 79..93

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 122.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def import_rounds(self, f):
        round_interpreter_part = make_interpreter(
            tournament=self.tournament,
            stage=self.lookup_round_stage,
            draw_type=self.lookup_draw_type,
              Severity: Major
              Found in tabbycat/importer/importers/anorak.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
              tabbycat/importer/importers/boots.py on lines 72..86

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 122.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def add_message(self, nsaved, ndeleted):
        if nsaved > 0:
            messages.success(self.request, ngettext(
                "Saved %(count)d adjudicator-team conflict.",
                "Saved %(count)d adjudicator-team conflicts.",
              Severity: Major
              Found in tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py and 3 other locations - About 6 hrs to fix
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 262..276
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 304..318
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 349..363

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 121.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def add_message(self, nsaved, ndeleted):
        if nsaved > 0:
            messages.success(self.request, ngettext(
                "Saved %(count)d adjudicator-institution conflict.",
                "Saved %(count)d adjudicator-institution conflicts.",
              Severity: Major
              Found in tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py and 3 other locations - About 6 hrs to fix
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 219..233
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 262..276
              tabbycat/adjallocation/views.py on lines 349..363

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 121.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Severity
              Category
              Status
              Source
              Language