Showing 106 of 141 total issues
Function thickness_hydrostatic
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def thickness_hydrostatic(pressure, temperature, mixing_ratio=None,
molecular_weight_ratio=mpconsts.nounit.epsilon, bottom=None,
depth=None):
r"""Calculate the thickness of a layer via the hypsometric equation.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _merge_mandatory_temps
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _merge_mandatory_temps(self, merged, parts, section, qcman, bgl, plast):
"""Process and merge mandatory temperature sections."""
num_levels = len(parts[section]['PRES'])
start_level = {
'TTAA': 1,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
uag, vag = ageostrophic_wind(z.T, u.T, v.T, 100. * units.kilometer,
100. * units.kilometer, latitude)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
uag, vag = ageostrophic_wind(z.T, u.T, v.T, 100. * units.kilometer,
100. * units.kilometer, latitude)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function find_axis_number
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_axis_number(self, axis):
"""Return the dimension number of the axis corresponding to the given identifier.
Parameters
----------
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function plot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plot(self, plotter, data_dict):
"""Plot a collection of data using this layout for a station plot.
This function iterates through the entire specified layout, pulling the fields named
in the layout from `data_dict` and plotting them using `plotter` as specified
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function advection
has 13 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def advection(
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, prod):
"""Initialize the values and labels from the product."""
# Don't worry about super() since we're using our own lut assembled sequentially
self.labels = []
self.lut = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function obsdata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def obsdata(self):
"""Return the internal cached data."""
if getattr(self, '_obsdata', None) is None:
# Use a copy of data so we retain all of the original data passed in unmodified
data = self.data
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if var2 is not None:
sounding[var2][i] = outdata[var2]
i += 1
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (self.grid_meta_int.missing_flag and idat == imiss):
grid[j, i] = self.prod_desc.missing_float
else:
if first:
grid[j, i] = self.grid_meta_real.reference
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ibit > 32:
ibit -= 32
iword += 1
Function _decode_msg13
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _decode_msg13(self, msg_hdr):
data = self._buffer_segment(msg_hdr)
if data:
data = struct.Struct(f'>{len(data) // 2:d}h').unpack(data)
# Legacy format doesn't have date/time and has fewer azimuths
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for param, val in sounding.items():
if (param in ['PRES', 'TEMP', 'DWPT',
'DRCT', 'SPED', 'HGHT']):
adata[param] = val[i - 1]
bdata[param] = val[iabove]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if jshft > 0:
jshft -= 32
idat2 = self._fortran_ishift(packed_buffer[iword + 1], jshft)
idat |= idat2
Function _decode_msg31
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _decode_msg31(self, msg_hdr):
msg_start = self._buffer.set_mark()
data_hdr = self._buffer.read_struct(self.msg31_data_hdr_fmt)
if data_hdr.compression:
log.warning('Compressed message 31 not supported!')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if parts[section]['PRES'][i] != self.prod_desc.missing_float:
qcman.append(parts[section]['PRES'][i])
Function _unpack_packet_special_graphic_symbol
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _unpack_packet_special_graphic_symbol(self, code, in_sym_block):
type_map = {3: 'Mesocyclone', 11: '3D Correlated Shear', 12: 'TVS',
26: 'ETVS', 13: 'Positive Hail', 14: 'Probable Hail',
15: 'Storm ID', 19: 'HDA', 25: 'STI Circle'}
point_feature_map = {1: 'Mesocyclone (ext.)', 3: 'Mesocyclone',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while not found:
if sounding[var1][iabove] != missing:
found = True
else:
iabove += 1
Function interpolate_to_grid
has 12 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def interpolate_to_grid(x, y, z, interp_type='linear', hres=50000,