Showing 307 of 307 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
count_rows($Q,$Z,$Vc,$s){global$y;$I=" FROM ".table($Q).($Z?" WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"");return($Vc&&($y=="sql"||count($s)==1)?"SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ".implode(", ",$s).")$I":"SELECT COUNT(*)".($Vc?" FROM (SELECT 1$I$zc) x":$I));}function
slow_query($I){global$b,$T;$i=$b->database();$cg=$b->queryTimeout();if(support("kill")&&is_object($f=connect())&&($i==""||$f->select_db($i))){$bd=$f->result("SELECT CONNECTION_ID()");echo'<script type="text/javascript">
var timeout = setTimeout(function () {
ajax(\'',js_escape(ME),'script=kill\', function () {
}, \'token=',$T,'&kill=',$bd,'\');- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 200.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X)$K.='<option'.($Eg||is_string($z)?' value="'.h($z).'"':'').(($Eg||is_string($z)?(string)$z:$X)===$qf?' selected':'').'>'.h($X);if(is_array($W))$K.='</optgroup>';}return$K;}function
html_select($F,$be,$Y="",$Wd=true){if($Wd)return"<select name='".h($F)."'".(is_string($Wd)?' onchange="'.h($Wd).'"':"").">".optionlist($be,$Y)."</select>";$K="";foreach($be
as$z=>$X)$K.="<label><input type='radio' name='".h($F)."' value='".h($z)."'".($z==$Y?" checked":"").">".h($X)."</label>";return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$x=>$V)$K.='<option'.($Fe||is_string($x)?' value="'.h($x).'"':'').(($Fe||is_string($x)?(string)$x:$V)===$Id?' selected':'').'>'.h($V);if(is_array($U))$K.='</optgroup>';}return$K;}function
html_select($D,$Xc,$W="",$Sc=true){if($Sc)return"<select name='".h($D)."'".(is_string($Sc)?' onchange="'.h($Sc).'"':"").">".optionlist($Xc,$W)."</select>";$K="";foreach($Xc
as$x=>$V)$K.="<label><input type='radio' name='".h($D)."' value='".h($x)."'".($x==$W?" checked":"").">".h($V)."</label>";return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function input has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enum_input($U,$wa,$l,$Y,$Sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);$K=($Sb!==null?"<label><input type='$U'$wa value='$Sb'".((is_array($Y)?in_array($Sb,$Y):$Y===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?$Y==$t+1:(is_array($Y)?in_array($t+1,$Y):$Y===$X));$K.=" <label><input type='$U'$wa value='".($t+1)."'".($Na?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
input($l,$Y,$q){global$e,$tg,$b,$y;$F=h(bracket_escape($l["field"]));echo"<td class='function'>";if(is_array($Y)&&!$q){$ta=array($Y);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,5.4)>=0)$ta[]=JSON_PRETTY_PRINT;$Y=call_user_func_array('json_encode',$ta);$q="json";}$cf=($y=="mssql"&&$l["auto_increment"]);if($cf&&!$_POST["save"])$q=null;$xc=(isset($_GET["select"])||$cf?array("orig"=>'original'):array())+$b->editFunctions($l);$wa=" name='fields[$F]'";if($l["type"]=="enum")echo
nbsp($xc[""])."<td>".$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);else{$pc=0;foreach($xc
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function input has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enum_input($ue,$c,$l,$W,$sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$Bc);$K=($sb!==null?"<label><input type='$ue'$c value='$sb'".((is_array($W)?in_array($sb,$W):$W===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($Bc[1]as$q=>$V){$V=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$V));$Fa=(is_int($W)?$W==$q+1:(is_array($W)?in_array($q+1,$W):$W===$V));$K.=" <label><input type='$ue'$c value='".($q+1)."'".($Fa?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($V,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
input($l,$W,$o){global$f,$we,$b,$v;$D=h(bracket_escape($l["field"]));echo"<td class='function'>";if(is_array($W)&&!$o){$na=array($W);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,5.4)>=0)$na[]=JSON_PRETTY_PRINT;$W=call_user_func_array('json_encode',$na);$o="json";}$Ad=($v=="mssql"&&$l["auto_increment"]);if($Ad&&!$_POST["save"])$o=null;$Tb=(isset($_GET["select"])||$Ad?array("orig"=>'original'):array())+$b->editFunctions($l);$c=" name='fields[$D]'";if($l["type"]=="enum")echo
nbsp($Tb[""])."<td>".$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$c,$W);else{$Ib=0;foreach($Tb
as$x=>$V){if($x===""||!$V)break;$Ib++;}$Sc=($Ib?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($Ib > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $Ib;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$c.=$Sc;$Yb=(in_array($o,$Tb)||isset($Tb[$o]));echo(count($Tb)>1?"<select name='function[$D]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($Tb,$o===null||$Yb?$o:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($Tb))).'<td>';$mc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$c,$W);if($mc!="")echo$mc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$Bc);foreach($Bc[1]as$q=>$V){$V=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$V));$Fa=(is_int($W)?($W>>$q)&1:in_array($V,explode(",",$W),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$D][$q]' value='".(1<<$q)."'".($Fa?' checked':'')."$Sc>".h($b->editVal($V,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$D'$Sc>";elseif(($ge=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$W)){if($ge&&$v!="sqlite")$c.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($W,"\n")+1);$c.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$c>".h($W).'</textarea>';}elseif($o=="json")echo"<textarea$c cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($W).'</textarea>';else{$Gc=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$A)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$A[1]+($A[3]?1:0)+($A[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($we[$l["type"]]?$we[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($v=='sql'&&$f->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$Gc+=7;echo"<input".((!$Yb||$o==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($W)."'".($Gc?" maxlength='$Gc'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$Gc>20?" size='40'":"")."$c>";}}}function- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
redirect($_,$B=null){if($B!==null){restart_session();$_SESSION["messages"][preg_replace('~^[^?]*~','',($_!==null?$_:$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]))][]=$B;}if($_!==null){if($_=="")$_=".";header("Location: $_");exit;}}function
query_redirect($I,$_,$B,$xd=true,$zb=true,$Bb=false,$je=""){global$f,$k,$b;if($zb){$Td=microtime(true);$Bb=!$f->query($I);$je=format_time($Td);}$Sd="";if($I)$Sd=$b->messageQuery($I,$je);if($Bb){$k=error().$Sd;return
false;}if($xd)redirect($_,$B.$Sd);return
true;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 187.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
redirect($B,$D=null){if($D!==null){restart_session();$_SESSION["messages"][preg_replace('~^[^?]*~','',($B!==null?$B:$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]))][]=$D;}if($B!==null){if($B=="")$B=".";header("Location: $B");exit;}}function
query_redirect($I,$B,$D,$Ue=true,$cc=true,$ic=false,$bg=""){global$e,$k,$b;if($cc){$Cf=microtime(true);$ic=!$e->query($I);$bg=format_time($Cf);}$Bf="";if($I)$Bf=$b->messageQuery($I,$bg);if($ic){$k=error().$Bf;return
false;}if($Ue)redirect($B,$D.$Bf);return
true;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 187.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
send(){fseek($this->handler,0);fpassthru($this->handler);fclose($this->handler);}}$Vb="'(?:''|[^'\\\\]|\\\\.)*'";$Oc="IN|OUT|INOUT";if(isset($_GET["select"])&&($_POST["edit"]||$_POST["clone"])&&!$_POST["save"])$_GET["edit"]=$_GET["select"];if(isset($_GET["callf"]))$_GET["call"]=$_GET["callf"];if(isset($_GET["function"]))$_GET["procedure"]=$_GET["function"];if(isset($_GET["download"])){$a=$_GET["download"];$m=fields($a);header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".friendly_url("$a-".implode("_",$_GET["where"])).".".friendly_url($_GET["field"]));$N=array(idf_escape($_GET["field"]));$J=$j->select($a,$N,array(where($_GET,$m)),$N);$L=($J?$J->fetch_row():array());echo$L[0];exit;}elseif(isset($_GET["table"])){$a=$_GET["table"];$m=fields($a);if(!$m)$k=error();$R=table_status1($a,true);page_header(($m&&is_view($R)?'View':'Table').": ".h($a),$k);$b->selectLinks($R);$bb=$R["Comment"];if($bb!="")echo"<p>".'Comment'.": ".h($bb)."\n";if($m){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Column'."<td>".'Type'.(support("comment")?"<td>".'Comment':"")."</thead>\n";foreach($m
as$l){echo"<tr".odd()."><th>".h($l["field"]),"<td><span title='".h($l["collation"])."'>".h($l["full_type"])."</span>",($l["null"]?" <i>NULL</i>":""),($l["auto_increment"]?" <i>".'Auto Increment'."</i>":""),(isset($l["default"])?" <span title='".'Default value'."'>[<b>".h($l["default"])."</b>]</span>":""),(support("comment")?"<td>".nbsp($l["comment"]):""),"\n";}echo"</table>\n";}if(!is_view($R)){if(support("indexes")){echo"<h3 id='indexes'>".'Indexes'."</h3>\n";$w=indexes($a);if($w){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($w
as$F=>$v){ksort($v["columns"]);$Ie=array();foreach($v["columns"]as$z=>$X)$Ie[]="<i>".h($X)."</i>".($v["lengths"][$z]?"(".$v["lengths"][$z].")":"").($v["descs"][$z]?" DESC":"");echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'><th>$v[type]<td>".implode(", ",$Ie)."\n";}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'indexes='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Alter indexes'."</a>\n";}if(fk_support($R)){echo"<h3 id='foreign-keys'>".'Foreign keys'."</h3>\n";$o=foreign_keys($a);if($o){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Source'."<td>".'Target'."<td>".'ON DELETE'."<td>".'ON UPDATE'."<td> </thead>\n";foreach($o
as$F=>$n){echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'>","<th><i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["source"]))."</i>","<td><a href='".h($n["db"]!=""?preg_replace('~db=[^&]*~',"db=".urlencode($n["db"]),ME):($n["ns"]!=""?preg_replace('~ns=[^&]*~',"ns=".urlencode($n["ns"]),ME):ME))."table=".urlencode($n["table"])."'>".($n["db"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["db"])."</b>.":"").($n["ns"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["ns"])."</b>.":"").h($n["table"])."</a>","(<i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["target"]))."</i>)","<td>".nbsp($n["on_delete"])."\n","<td>".nbsp($n["on_update"])."\n",'<td><a href="'.h(ME.'foreign='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($F)).'">'.'Alter'.'</a>';}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'foreign='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add foreign key'."</a>\n";}}if(support(is_view($R)?"view_trigger":"trigger")){echo"<h3 id='triggers'>".'Triggers'."</h3>\n";$qg=triggers($a);if($qg){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($qg
as$z=>$X)echo"<tr valign='top'><td>".h($X[0])."<td>".h($X[1])."<th>".h($z)."<td><a href='".h(ME.'trigger='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($z))."'>".'Alter'."</a>\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'trigger='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add trigger'."</a>\n";}}elseif(isset($_GET["schema"])){page_header('Database schema',"",array(),h(DB.($_GET["ns"]?".$_GET[ns]":"")));$Qf=array();$Rf=array();$ea=($_GET["schema"]?$_GET["schema"]:$_COOKIE["adminer_schema-".str_replace(".","_",DB)]);preg_match_all('~([^:]+):([-0-9.]+)x([-0-9.]+)(_|$)~',$ea,$rd,PREG_SET_ORDER);foreach($rd- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 182.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
q($Eb);}return$b->processInput($l,$W,$o);}function
fields_from_edit(){global$i;$K=array();foreach((array)$_POST["field_keys"]as$x=>$V){if($V!=""){$V=bracket_escape($V);$_POST["function"][$V]=$_POST["field_funs"][$x];$_POST["fields"][$V]=$_POST["field_vals"][$x];}}foreach((array)$_POST["fields"]as$x=>$V){$D=bracket_escape($x,1);$K[$D]=array("field"=>$D,"privileges"=>array("insert"=>1,"update"=>1),"null"=>1,"auto_increment"=>($x==$i->primary),);}return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 181.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
q($mc);}return$b->processInput($l,$Y,$q);}function
fields_from_edit(){global$j;$K=array();foreach((array)$_POST["field_keys"]as$z=>$X){if($X!=""){$X=bracket_escape($X);$_POST["function"][$X]=$_POST["field_funs"][$z];$_POST["fields"][$X]=$_POST["field_vals"][$z];}}foreach((array)$_POST["fields"]as$z=>$X){$F=bracket_escape($z,1);$K[$F]=array("field"=>$F,"privileges"=>array("insert"=>1,"update"=>1),"null"=>1,"auto_increment"=>($z==$j->primary),);}return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 181.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function page_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Adminer);function
page_header($le,$k="",$Ca=array(),$me=""){global$ba,$ca,$b,$jb,$v;page_headers();if(is_ajax()&&$k){page_messages($k);exit;}$ne=$le.($me!=""?": $me":"");$oe=strip_tags($ne.(SERVER!=""&&SERVER!="localhost"?h(" - ".SERVER):"")." - ".$b->name());echo'<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function selectSearchProcess has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
array($N,$s);}function
selectSearchProcess($m,$w){global$e,$y;$K=array();foreach($w
as$t=>$v){if($v["type"]=="FULLTEXT"&&$_GET["fulltext"][$t]!="")$K[]="MATCH (".implode(", ",array_map('idf_escape',$v["columns"])).") AGAINST (".q($_GET["fulltext"][$t]).(isset($_GET["boolean"][$t])?" IN BOOLEAN MODE":"").")";}foreach((array)$_GET["where"]as$X){if("$X[col]$X[val]"!=""&&in_array($X["op"],$this->operators)){$db=" $X[op]";if(preg_match('~IN$~',$X["op"])){$Lc=process_length($X["val"]);$db.=" ".($Lc!=""?$Lc:"(NULL)");}elseif($X["op"]=="SQL")$db=" $X[val]";elseif($X["op"]=="LIKE %%")$db=" LIKE ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],"%$X[val]%");elseif($X["op"]=="ILIKE %%")$db=" ILIKE ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],"%$X[val]%");elseif(!preg_match('~NULL$~',$X["op"]))$db.=" ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],$X["val"]);if($X["col"]!="")$K[]=idf_escape($X["col"]).$db;else{$Ya=array();foreach($m
as$F=>$l){$Xc=preg_match('~char|text|enum|set~',$l["type"]);if((is_numeric($X["val"])||!preg_match('~(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal|bit~',$l["type"]))&&(!preg_match("~[\x80-\xFF]~",$X["val"])||$Xc)){$F=idf_escape($F);$Ya[]=($y=="sql"&&$Xc&&!preg_match("~^utf8_~",$l["collation"])?"CONVERT($F USING ".charset($e).")":$F);}}$K[]=($Ya?"(".implode("$db OR ",$Ya)."$db)":"0");}}}return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function page_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Adminer);if($b->operators===null)$b->operators=$Zd;function
page_header($eg,$k="",$Ha=array(),$fg=""){global$ca,$ga,$b,$Eb,$y;page_headers();if(is_ajax()&&$k){page_messages($k);exit;}$gg=$eg.($fg!=""?": $fg":"");$hg=strip_tags($gg.(SERVER!=""&&SERVER!="localhost"?h(" - ".SERVER):"")." - ".$b->name());echo'<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^0-9]+~','',$V);}function
remove_slashes($pd,$Hb=false){if(get_magic_quotes_gpc()){while(list($x,$V)=each($pd)){foreach($V
as$w=>$U){unset($pd[$x][$w]);if(is_array($U)){$pd[$x][stripslashes($w)]=$U;$pd[]=&$pd[$x][stripslashes($w)];}else$pd[$x][stripslashes($w)]=($Hb?$U:stripslashes($U));}}}}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 163.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^0-9]+~','',$X);}function
remove_slashes($Me,$oc=false){if(get_magic_quotes_gpc()){while(list($z,$X)=each($Me)){foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W){unset($Me[$z][$Zc]);if(is_array($W)){$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=$W;$Me[]=&$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)];}else$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=($oc?$W:stripslashes($W));}}}}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 163.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function edit_form has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on_help($Pa,$Pd=0){return" onmouseover='helpMouseover(this, event, ".h($Pa).", $Pd);' onmouseout='helpMouseout(this, event);'";}function
edit_form($a,$m,$L,$De){global$b,$v,$qe,$k;$de=$b->tableName(table_status1($a,true));page_header(($De?'Edit':'Insert'),$k,array("select"=>array($a,$de)),$de);if($L===false)echo"<p class='error'>".'No rows.'."\n";echo'<form action="" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" id="form">
';if(!$m)echo"<p class='error'>".'You have no privileges to update this table.'."\n";else{echo"<table cellspacing='0' onkeydown='return editingKeydown(event);'>\n";foreach($m
as$D=>$l){echo"<tr><th>".$b->fieldName($l);$cb=$_GET["set"][bracket_escape($D)];if($cb===null){$cb=$l["default"];if($l["type"]=="bit"&&preg_match("~^b'([01]*)'\$~",$cb,$yd))$cb=$yd[1];}$W=($L!==null?($L[$D]!=""&&$v=="sql"&&preg_match("~enum|set~",$l["type"])?(is_array($L[$D])?array_sum($L[$D]):+$L[$D]):$L[$D]):(!$De&&$l["auto_increment"]?"":(isset($_GET["select"])?false:$cb)));if(!$_POST["save"]&&is_string($W))$W=$b->editVal($W,$l);$o=($_POST["save"]?(string)$_POST["function"][$D]:($De&&$l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?"now":($W===false?null:($W!==null?'':'NULL'))));if(preg_match("~time~",$l["type"])&&$W=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"){$W="";$o="now";}input($l,$W,$o);echo"\n";}if(!support("table"))echo"<tr>"."<th><input name='field_keys[]' onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);' onchange='fieldChange(this);' value=''>"."<td class='function'>".html_select("field_funs[]",$b->editFunctions(array("null"=>isset($_GET["select"]))))."<td><input name='field_vals[]'>"."\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo"<p>\n";if($m){echo"<input type='submit' value='".'Save'."'>\n";if(!isset($_GET["select"]))echo"<input type='submit' name='insert' value='".($De?'Save and continue edit'."' onclick='return !ajaxForm(this.form, \"".'Saving'.'...", this)':'Save and insert next')."' title='Ctrl+Shift+Enter'>\n";}echo($De?"<input type='submit' name='delete' value='".'Delete'."'".confirm().">\n":($_POST||!$m?"":"<script type='text/javascript'>focus(document.getElementById('form').getElementsByTagName('td')[1].firstChild);</script>\n"));if(isset($_GET["select"]))hidden_fields(array("check"=>(array)$_POST["check"],"clone"=>$_POST["clone"],"all"=>$_POST["all"]));echo'<input type="hidden" name="referer" value="',h(isset($_POST["referer"])?$_POST["referer"]:$_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"]),'">
<input type="hidden" name="save" value="1">- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function selectSearchProcess has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
array(array(),array());}function
selectSearchProcess($m,$t){$K=array();foreach((array)$_GET["where"]as$x=>$Y){$La=$Y["col"];$Uc=$Y["op"];$V=$Y["val"];if(($x<0?"":$La).$V!=""){$Ra=array();foreach(($La!=""?array($La=>$m[$La]):$m)as$D=>$l){if($La!=""||is_numeric($V)||!preg_match('~int|float|double|decimal~',$l["type"])){$D=idf_escape($D);if($La!=""&&$l["type"]=="enum")$Ra[]=(in_array(0,$V)?"$D IS NULL OR ":"")."$D IN (".implode(", ",array_map('intval',$V)).")";else{$ie=preg_match('~char|text|enum|set~',$l["type"]);$W=$this->processInput($l,(!$Uc&&$ie&&preg_match('~^[^%]+$~',$V)?"%$V%":$V));$Ra[]=$D.($W=="NULL"?" IS".($Uc==">="?" NOT":"")." $W":(in_array($Uc,$this->operators)||$Uc=="="?" $Uc $W":($ie?" LIKE $W":" IN (".str_replace(",","', '",$W).")")));if($x<0&&$V=="0")$Ra[]="$D IS NULL";}}}$K[]=($Ra?"(".implode(" OR ",$Ra).")":"0");}}return$K;}function- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function edit_form has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on_help($Za,$xf=0){return" onmouseover='helpMouseover(this, event, ".h($Za).", $xf);' onmouseout='helpMouseout(this, event);'";}function
edit_form($a,$m,$L,$Ag){global$b,$y,$T,$k;$Pf=$b->tableName(table_status1($a,true));page_header(($Ag?'Edit':'Insert'),$k,array("select"=>array($a,$Pf)),$Pf);if($L===false)echo"<p class='error'>".'No rows.'."\n";echo'<form action="" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" id="form">
';if(!$m)echo"<p class='error'>".'You have no privileges to update this table.'."\n";else{echo"<table cellspacing='0' onkeydown='return editingKeydown(event);'>\n";foreach($m
as$F=>$l){echo"<tr><th>".$b->fieldName($l);$vb=$_GET["set"][bracket_escape($F)];if($vb===null){$vb=$l["default"];if($l["type"]=="bit"&&preg_match("~^b'([01]*)'\$~",$vb,$af))$vb=$af[1];}$Y=($L!==null?($L[$F]!=""&&$y=="sql"&&preg_match("~enum|set~",$l["type"])?(is_array($L[$F])?array_sum($L[$F]):+$L[$F]):$L[$F]):(!$Ag&&$l["auto_increment"]?"":(isset($_GET["select"])?false:$vb)));if(!$_POST["save"]&&is_string($Y))$Y=$b->editVal($Y,$l);$q=($_POST["save"]?(string)$_POST["function"][$F]:($Ag&&$l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?"now":($Y===false?null:($Y!==null?'':'NULL'))));if(preg_match("~time~",$l["type"])&&$Y=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"){$Y="";$q="now";}input($l,$Y,$q);echo"\n";}if(!support("table"))echo"<tr>"."<th><input name='field_keys[]' onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);' onchange='fieldChange(this);' value=''>"."<td class='function'>".html_select("field_funs[]",$b->editFunctions(array("null"=>isset($_GET["select"]))))."<td><input name='field_vals[]'>"."\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo"<p>\n";if($m){echo"<input type='submit' value='".'Save'."'>\n";if(!isset($_GET["select"]))echo"<input type='submit' name='insert' value='".($Ag?'Save and continue edit'."' onclick='return !ajaxForm(this.form, \"".'Saving'.'...", this)':'Save and insert next')."' title='Ctrl+Shift+Enter'>\n";}echo($Ag?"<input type='submit' name='delete' value='".'Delete'."'".confirm().">\n":($_POST||!$m?"":"<script type='text/javascript'>focus(document.getElementById('form').getElementsByTagName('td')[1].firstChild);</script>\n"));if(isset($_GET["select"]))hidden_fields(array("check"=>(array)$_POST["check"],"clone"=>$_POST["clone"],"all"=>$_POST["all"]));echo'<input type="hidden" name="referer" value="',h(isset($_POST["referer"])?$_POST["referer"]:$_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"]),'">
<input type="hidden" name="save" value="1">- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
str_replace("\n","<br>",$Gf);}function
checkbox($F,$Y,$Na,$dd="",$Xd="",$Ra=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$F' value='".h($Y)."'".($Na?" checked":"").($Xd?' onclick="'.h($Xd).'"':'').">";return($dd!=""||$Ra?"<label".($Ra?" class='$Ra'":"").">$K".h($dd)."</label>":$K);}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 152.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
str_replace("\n","<br>",$Q);}function
checkbox($D,$W,$Fa,$sc="",$Tc="",$Ia=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$D' value='".h($W)."'".($Fa?" checked":"").($Tc?' onclick="'.h($Tc).'"':'').">";return($sc!=""||$Ia?"<label".($Ia?" class='$Ia'":"").">$K".h($sc)."</label>":$K);}function- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 152.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76